• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体典型性和群体内尊重判断中的感知和谐。

Perceptual harmony in judgments of group prototypicality and intragroup respect.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243821. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243821
PMID:33351832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7755273/
Abstract

We test common sense psychology of intragroup relations whereby people assume that intragroup respect and ingroup prototypicality are positively related. In Study 1a, participants rated a group member as more prototypical if they learned that group member was highly respected rather than disrespected. In Study 1b, participants rated a group member as more respected by other group members if they learned that group member was prototypical rather than unprototypical. As a commonsense psychology of groups, we reasoned that the perceived relationship between prototypicality and intragroup respect would be stronger for cohesive groups compared to incohesive groups. The effect of intragroup respect on perceptions of prototypicality (Study 2a & 2c) and the effect of prototypicality on perceptions of intragroup respect (Study 2b) were generally stronger for participants considering cohesive groups relative to incohesive groups. However, the interaction effect of prototypicality and group cohesion on intragroup respect did fail to replicate in Study 2d. In Studies 3, 4a, and 4b we manipulated the relationship between prototypicality and intragroup respect and found that when these variables were in perceptual harmony participants perceived groups as more cohesive. The results of eight out of nine studies conducted are consistent with the prediction that people make inferences about intragroup respect, prototypicality, and group cohesion in a manner that maintains perceptual harmony.

摘要

我们检验了群体内关系的常识性心理学,即人们认为群体内尊重和群体典型性呈正相关。在研究 1a 中,如果参与者了解到群体成员受到高度尊重而不是被轻视,他们会认为该成员更具典型性。在研究 1b 中,如果参与者了解到群体成员更具典型性而不是非典型性,他们会认为其他群体成员更尊重该成员。作为群体的常识心理学,我们推断,与不具凝聚力的群体相比,凝聚力强的群体中典型性和群体内尊重之间的感知关系更强。群体内尊重对典型性感知的影响(研究 2a 和 2c)以及典型性对群体内尊重感知的影响(研究 2b)对于考虑到凝聚力强的群体的参与者来说通常更强。然而,在研究 2d 中,典型性和群体凝聚力对群体内尊重的交互效应未能复制。在研究 3、4a 和 4b 中,我们操纵了典型性和群体内尊重之间的关系,发现当这些变量在感知上协调一致时,参与者会认为群体更具凝聚力。九项研究中有八项的结果与以下预测一致,即人们会以一种保持感知协调的方式,对群体内尊重、典型性和群体凝聚力进行推断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/dc334ba0042e/pone.0243821.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/998c04899350/pone.0243821.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/e8d7f3f65a4b/pone.0243821.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/8aff5d617ddf/pone.0243821.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/c5dd13295db9/pone.0243821.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/57abcc0da08b/pone.0243821.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/a93760da2011/pone.0243821.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/dc334ba0042e/pone.0243821.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/998c04899350/pone.0243821.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/e8d7f3f65a4b/pone.0243821.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/8aff5d617ddf/pone.0243821.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/c5dd13295db9/pone.0243821.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/57abcc0da08b/pone.0243821.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/a93760da2011/pone.0243821.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e49e/7755273/dc334ba0042e/pone.0243821.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptual harmony in judgments of group prototypicality and intragroup respect.群体典型性和群体内尊重判断中的感知和谐。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0243821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243821. eCollection 2020.
2
On the crucial role of mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link.论心理内群体表征在群体内偏见及群体内原型性与群体内偏见联系中的关键作用。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):156-64. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.156.
3
Complex inclusive categories of positive and negative valence and prototypicality claims in asymmetric intergroup relations.不对称群体间关系中正负价和典型性主张的复杂包容性类别。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):457-83. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12148. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
4
Group status is related to group prototypicality in the absence of social identity concerns.群体状态与群体典型性有关,而与社会认同关注无关。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 May-Jun;152(3):386-9. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.614648.
5
Boundaries of American Identity: Relations between Ethnic Group Prototypicality and Policy Attitudes.美国身份认同的边界:族群典型性与政策态度之间的关系
Polit Psychol. 2015 Aug 1;36(4):449-468. doi: 10.1111/pops.12189.
6
Respect for group members: intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior.对小组成员的尊重:集体认同和群体服务行为的组内决定因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Feb;29(2):183-93. doi: 10.1177/0146167202239043.
7
Newcomers to Social Categories: Longitudinal Predictors and Consequences of Ingroup Identification.社会类别新成员:群体认同的纵向预测因素及后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jun;42(6):811-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167216643937.
8
Neural processing of prototypicality and simplicity of product design in forming design preferences.产品设计典型性和简单性的神经加工在设计偏好形成中的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0297148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297148. eCollection 2024.
9
Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.原型很有吸引力,因为它们让人省心。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x.
10
The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.我们当中声名狼藉之人:对不合作的群体成员的声誉记忆增强。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Too True to be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Nonsignificant Findings Are Probably True.太真实而并非糟糕:当具有显著和非显著结果的研究集可能为真时。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Nov;8(8):875-881. doi: 10.1177/1948550617693058. Epub 2017 May 5.
2
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences.TurkPrime.com:一个适用于行为科学的多功能众包数据采集平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):433-442. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
3
Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).
更好的P曲线:使P曲线分析对错误、欺诈和激进的P值操纵更具稳健性,对乌尔里希和米勒(2015年)的回应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):1146-52. doi: 10.1037/xge0000104.
4
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
5
Concepts and folk theories.概念与民间理论。
Annu Rev Anthropol. 2011 Oct 1;40:379-398. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145822. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
6
The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.多项研究文章中显著结果对可信度的反讽效应。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):551-66. doi: 10.1037/a0029487. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
Testing an integrative model of respect: implications for social engagement and well-being.测试尊重的综合模型:对社会参与和幸福感的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Feb;36(2):200-12. doi: 10.1177/0146167209356787. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
8
Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not.程序公平的替代物:典型领导者无论是否公平都会得到认可。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jan;94(1):235-44. doi: 10.1037/a0012936.
9
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
10
Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life.自然情境下的人格:日常生活中人格的表现及内隐民间理论
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):862-77. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862.