Ko Gwangpyo, Simmons Otto D, Likirdopulos Christina A, Worley-Davis Lynn, Williams Mike, Sobsey Mark D
Department of Environmental Health and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Dec 1;42(23):8849-57. doi: 10.1021/es801091t.
Microbial air pollution from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) has raised concerns about potential public health and environmental impacts. We investigated the levels of bioaerosols released from two swine farms using conventional lagoon-sprayfield technology and ten farms using alternative waste treatment and management technologies in the United States. In total, 424 microbial air samples taken at the 12 CAFOs were analyzed for several indicator and pathogenic microorganisms, including culturable bacteria and fungi, fecal coliform, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, bacteriophage, and Salmonella. At all of the investigated farms, bacterial concentrations at the downwind boundary were higher than those at the upwind boundary, suggesting that the farms are sources of microbial air contamination. In addition, fecal indicator microorganisms were found more frequently near barns and treatmenttechnology sites than upwind or downwind of the farms. Approximately 4.5% (19/424), 1.2% (5/424), 22.2% (94/424), and 12.3% (53/424) of samples were positive for fecal coliform, E. coli, Clostridium, and total coliphage, respectively. Based on statistical comparison of airborne fecal indicator concentrations at alternative treatment technology farms compared to control farms with conventional technology, three alternative waste treatment technologies appear to perform better at reducing the airborne release of fecal indicator microorganisms during on-farm treatment and management processes. These results demonstrate that airborne microbial contaminants are released from swine farms and pose possible exposure risks to farm workers and nearby neighbors. However, the release of airborne microorganisms appears to decrease significantly through the use of certain alternative waste management and treatment technologies.
集中式动物饲养场(CAFOs)产生的微生物空气污染引发了人们对其可能对公众健康和环境造成影响的担忧。我们调查了美国两家采用传统泻湖-喷洒场技术的养猪场以及十家采用替代性废物处理和管理技术的养猪场释放的生物气溶胶水平。总共对这12个集中式动物饲养场采集的424个微生物空气样本进行了分析,检测了几种指示性微生物和致病微生物,包括可培养细菌和真菌、粪大肠菌群、大肠杆菌、产气荚膜梭菌、噬菌体和沙门氏菌。在所有被调查的农场中,下风向边界处的细菌浓度高于上风向边界处,这表明这些农场是微生物空气污染的源头。此外,在畜舍和处理技术场所附近发现粪便指示微生物的频率高于农场的上风向或下风向。分别约有4.5%(19/424)、1.2%(5/424)、22.2%(94/424)和12.3%(53/424)的样本粪大肠菌群、大肠杆菌、梭菌和总噬菌体呈阳性。基于对采用替代性处理技术的农场与采用传统技术的对照农场空气中粪便指示物浓度的统计比较,三种替代性废物处理技术在农场处理和管理过程中似乎在减少粪便指示微生物的空气释放方面表现更好。这些结果表明,养猪场会释放空气传播的微生物污染物,对农场工人和附近居民构成潜在接触风险。然而,通过使用某些替代性废物管理和处理技术,空气传播微生物的释放似乎会显著减少。