Lazzaroni Marco, Porro Gabriele Bianchi
Department of Gastroenterology, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Drugs. 2009;69(1):51-69. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969010-00004.
The association between NSAIDs and the presence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications is well established. Evidence that acid aggravates NSAID-induced injury provides a rationale for minimizing such damage by acid suppression. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appear to be very effective in treating NSAID-related dyspepsia, and also in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients continuing to receive the NSAID. An analysis of data from comparative studies of PPIs versus ranitidine, misoprostol and sucralfate shows a therapeutic advantage in favour of the PPI. Several studies now confirm the efficacy of co-therapy with PPIs in the short- and long-term prevention of NSAID-induced upper GI injury. PPIs are more effective than histamine H(2)-receptor antagonists at standard dosages in reducing the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcer, and are superior to misoprostol in preventing duodenal but not gastric lesions. However, when balancing effectiveness and tolerance, PPIs may be considered the treatment of choice in the short- and long-term prevention of NSAID-related mucosal lesions. To date, there are only a few published articles dealing with the role of PPIs in the prevention of upper GI complications. Recent epidemiological and interventional studies provide some evidence that PPIs are of benefit. However, more controlled studies using clinical outcomes are needed to establish the best management strategy (PPIs combined with traditional NSAIDs or with cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors) especially in patients with multiple risk factors, in patients using concomitant low-dose aspirin, corticosteroids or anticoagulants (high risk group), or in patients with a history of ulcer complications (very high risk group). Furthermore, it should be underlined that Helicobacter pylori infection positively interacts with the gastroprotective effect of PPIs; therefore, the true efficacy of these drugs in preventing NSAID-related ulcer complications should be reassessed without the confounding influence of this microorganism.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与上消化道(GI)并发症之间的关联已得到充分证实。有证据表明胃酸会加重NSAID引起的损伤,这为通过抑制胃酸来减少此类损伤提供了理论依据。质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在治疗NSAID相关的消化不良方面似乎非常有效,对于继续服用NSAID的患者,在愈合胃和十二指肠溃疡方面也很有效。对PPI与雷尼替丁、米索前列醇和硫糖铝的对比研究数据进行分析,结果显示PPI具有治疗优势。现在有多项研究证实,PPI联合治疗在短期和长期预防NSAID引起的上消化道损伤方面具有疗效。在标准剂量下,PPI在降低胃和十二指肠溃疡风险方面比组胺H2受体拮抗剂更有效,在预防十二指肠而非胃病变方面优于米索前列醇。然而,在权衡有效性和耐受性时,PPI可被视为短期和长期预防NSAID相关黏膜病变的首选治疗方法。迄今为止,仅有少数已发表的文章探讨了PPI在预防上消化道并发症中的作用。近期的流行病学和干预性研究提供了一些证据表明PPI是有益的。然而,需要更多使用临床结局的对照研究来确定最佳管理策略(PPI与传统NSAIDs联合使用或与环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂联合使用),尤其是在具有多种危险因素的患者、同时使用低剂量阿司匹林、皮质类固醇或抗凝剂的患者(高风险组),或有溃疡并发症病史的患者(极高风险组)中。此外,应该强调的是,幽门螺杆菌感染与PPI的胃保护作用存在正向相互作用;因此,在没有这种微生物的混杂影响的情况下,应重新评估这些药物在预防NSAID相关溃疡并发症方面的真正疗效。