• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

税收减少了成年人吸烟率方面的社会差异。

Taxation reduces social disparities in adult smoking prevalence.

作者信息

Siahpush Mohammad, Wakefield Melanie A, Spittal Matt J, Durkin Sarah J, Scollo Michelle M

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6075, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.013
PMID:19201146
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The CDC, the WHO, and the World Bank promote increases in the price of cigarettes as an effective and important tobacco-control strategy. This study was designed to assess the extent to which the association between the price of cigarettes and smoking prevalence, as measured monthly, varies by income group.

METHODS

Australian population survey data collected monthly from January 1991 to December 2006 were used to estimate Poisson regression models to assess the impact of the price of cigarettes on smoking prevalence across three income groups. Analyses were conducted in 2008.

RESULTS

There was strong evidence that real price and prevalence were negatively associated (p<0.001) and that the association was stronger in lower-income groups (p<0.001). One Australian dollar increase in price was associated with a decline of 2.6%, 0.3%, and 0.2% in the prevalence of smoking among low-, medium-, and high-income groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the price of cigarettes not only is an effective tobacco-control strategy to lower smoking prevalence in the general population, but also may provide a means of reducing social disparities in smoking.

摘要

背景

美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)、世界卫生组织(WHO)以及世界银行都倡导提高卷烟价格,将其作为一项有效且重要的烟草控制策略。本研究旨在评估以月为单位衡量的卷烟价格与吸烟率之间的关联在不同收入群体中变化的程度。

方法

利用1991年1月至2006年12月每月收集的澳大利亚人口调查数据,估计泊松回归模型,以评估卷烟价格对三个收入群体吸烟率的影响。分析于2008年进行。

结果

有充分证据表明实际价格与吸烟率呈负相关(p<0.001),且这种关联在低收入群体中更强(p<0.001)。价格每上涨1澳元,低收入、中等收入和高收入群体的吸烟率分别下降2.6%、0.3%和0.2%。

结论

提高卷烟价格不仅是降低普通人群吸烟率的有效烟草控制策略,而且可能为减少吸烟方面的社会差异提供一种手段。

相似文献

1
Taxation reduces social disparities in adult smoking prevalence.税收减少了成年人吸烟率方面的社会差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
2
The impact of tobacco tax cuts on smoking initiation among Canadian young adults.烟草税削减对加拿大年轻人吸烟行为起始的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jun;30(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.02.001.
3
The impact of taxation on tobacco consumption in Mexico.税收对墨西哥烟草消费的影响。
Tob Control. 2008 Apr;17(2):105-10. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021030. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
4
Price effects on the smoking behaviour of adult age groups.价格对成年年龄组吸烟行为的影响。
Public Health. 2008 Dec;122(12):1343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.05.019. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
5
Public policy and smoking cessation among young adults in the United States.美国针对年轻人的公共政策与戒烟
Health Policy. 2004 Jun;68(3):321-32. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.007.
6
Australian smokers' and recent quitters' responses to the increasing price of cigarettes in the context of a tobacco tax increase.澳大利亚烟民和近期戒烟者对烟草税提高背景下香烟价格上涨的反应。
Addiction. 2011 Sep;106(9):1687-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03492.x. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
7
Revenue implications to the Vietnamese government of using taxes to curb cigarette smoking.使用税收手段抑制吸烟对越南政府收入的影响。
Addict Behav. 2010 Dec;35(12):1089-93. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
8
Public opinion regarding earmarked cigarette tax in Taiwan.台湾地区民众对特定用途香烟税的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2003 Dec 24;3:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-42.
9
Prevalence and correlates of purchasing contraband cigarettes on First Nations reserves in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省原住民保留地购买违禁香烟的患病率及相关因素
Addiction. 2009 Mar;104(3):488-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02453.x.
10
Price sensitivity and smoking smuggled cigarettes.价格敏感度与走私香烟吸食情况
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jan;19(1):23-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn115. Epub 2008 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia.哥伦比亚烟草支出挤出效应的不平等性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303328. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring the Link between Altitude of Residence and Smoking Patterns in the United States.探究美国居民居住地海拔与吸烟模式之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;21(2):226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020226.
3
Impact of tobacco spending on intrahousehold resource allocation in Montenegro.烟草支出对黑山家庭内资源分配的影响。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s75-s80. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057786.
4
Percentage of income spent on tobacco and intention to quit: a cross-sectional analysis of the JASTIS 2020 study.用于烟草的收入比例和戒烟意愿:对 JASTIS 2020 研究的横断面分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2022;27:46. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.22-00103.
5
Linking health and finance ministries to improve taxes on unhealthy products.将卫生和财政部门联系起来,以提高对不健康产品的税收。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Sep 1;100(9):570-577. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288104. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
The impact of cigarette prices on smoking participation and tobacco expenditure in Vietnam.香烟价格对越南吸烟参与率和烟草支出的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 14;16(12):e0260415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260415. eCollection 2021.
7
Tobacco Taxation and Its Prospective Impact on Disparities in Smoking Initiation and Progression Among Young Adults.烟草税及其对年轻人吸烟起始和进展差异的潜在影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Apr;68(4):765-772. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.031. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
8
Questioning the regressivity of tobacco taxes: a distributional accounting impact model of increased tobacco taxation.质疑烟草税的倒退性:提高烟草税的分配核算影响模型。
Tob Control. 2021 May;30(3):245-257. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055315. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Positive Effects of the National Cigarette Price Increase Policy on Smoking Cessation in South Korea.韩国提高香烟价格的国家政策对戒烟的积极影响。
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2020 Jan;83(1):71-80. doi: 10.4046/trd.2019.0011.
10
Socioeconomic status and cigarette expenditure among US households: results from 2010 to 2015 Consumer Expenditure Survey.美国家庭的社会经济地位与香烟支出:2010 年至 2015 年消费者支出调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e020571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020571.