de Carvalho Sales-Peres Sílvia Helena, Magalhães Ana Carolina, de Andrade Moreira Machado Maria Aparecida, Buzalaf Marília Afonso Rabelo
Departments of Biological Sciences and Paediatric Dentistry.
Eur J Dent. 2007 Jan;1(1):10-3.
This in vitro study evaluated the capability of different soft drinks (Coca-Cola(R)-C, Coca-Cola Light(R)-CL, Guaraná(R)-G, Pepsi Twist(R)-P and Sprite Light(R)-SL) to erode dental enamel, relating the percentage of superficial microhardness change (%SMHC) to concentrations of fluoride and phosphate, buffering capacity and pH of these drinks.
The soft drinks were evaluated in respect to concentration of phosphate and fluoride spectrophotometrically using Fiske, Subarrow method and by specific electrode (Orion 9609), respectively. The pH and the buffering capacity were determined by glass electrode and by estimating of the volume of NaOH necessary to change the pH of the drink in one unit, respectively. One hundred specimens of bovine enamel were randomly assigned to 5 groups of 20 each. They were exposed to 4 cycles of demineralisation in the beverage and remineralisation in artificial saliva. The softening of enamel was evaluated by %SMHC.
The mean %SMHC was: C=77.27%, CL= 72.45%, SL=78.43%, G=66.65% and P=67.95%. Comparing the %SMHC promoted by 5 soft drinks, SL = C > CL > P = G (P<.05). There was not significant correlation between %SMHC and the other variables tested for the five drinks (P>.05).
The five soft drinks caused surface softening of enamel (erosion). In respect to the chemical variables tested, despite not statistically significant, the pH seems to have more influence on the erosive potential of these drinks. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:10-13).
本体外研究评估了不同软饮料(可口可乐 - C、健怡可口可乐 - CL、瓜拉那汽水 - G、百事轻怡可乐 - P 和雪碧轻怡 - SL)对牙釉质的侵蚀能力,将表面显微硬度变化百分比(%SMHC)与这些饮料中的氟化物和磷酸盐浓度、缓冲能力及pH值相关联。
分别采用菲斯克 - 苏巴罗法通过分光光度法和使用特定电极(奥立龙9609)对软饮料中的磷酸盐和氟化物浓度进行评估。pH值和缓冲能力分别通过玻璃电极以及估计将饮料pH值改变一个单位所需的氢氧化钠体积来测定。将100个牛牙釉质标本随机分为5组,每组20个。它们在饮料中进行4个脱矿循环,并在人工唾液中进行再矿化。通过%SMHC评估牙釉质的软化情况。
平均%SMHC为:C = 77.27%,CL = 72.45%,SL = 78.43%,G = 66.65%,P = 67.95%。比较5种软饮料促进的%SMHC,SL = C > CL > P = G(P <.05)。对于这五种饮料,%SMHC与其他测试变量之间无显著相关性(P >.05)。
这五种软饮料导致牙釉质表面软化(侵蚀)。就所测试的化学变量而言,尽管无统计学意义,但pH值似乎对这些饮料的侵蚀潜力影响更大。(《欧洲牙科杂志》2007年;1:10 - 13)