Vajrabhaya La-Ongthong, Korsuwannawong Suwanna, Harnirattisai Choltacha, Teinchai Chayada
Endodontic Section, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Research Office, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Eur J Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):239-244. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.178319.
The aim of this study was to evaluate dentine permeability after brushing with Twin Lotus(®), Thai herbal toothpaste by comparing with Sensodyne Rapid Relief(®), a commercial desensitizing toothpaste, and also after artificial saliva (AS) immersion or citric acid challenge.
Dentine discs from human mandibular third molars were divided into three groups (n = 20) and brushed with either experimental toothpaste or water (control) for 2 min with an automated toothbrush. Then, 10 discs were immersed in AS, and the other 10 discs were immersed in 6% citric acid to simulate the conditions of the oral environment. The dentine permeability of each specimen was measured before brushing and after each treatment using a fluid filtration system. Morphological changes in the dentine were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Both toothpastes significantly reduced dentine permeability, and a crystalline precipitate was observed on the dentine surface under SEM observation. No significant difference was found between the two toothpaste groups with regard to dentine permeability after brushing and AS or acid immersion.
The dentine permeability reduction caused by the two toothpastes did not differ after brushing or after AS or citric acid immersion.
本研究旨在通过与商业脱敏牙膏舒适达快速缓解牙膏(Sensodyne Rapid Relief®)比较,评估使用双莲(Twin Lotus®)泰国草药牙膏刷牙后以及人工唾液(AS)浸泡或柠檬酸刺激后的牙本质渗透性。
将人下颌第三磨牙的牙本质盘分为三组(n = 20),用自动牙刷分别用实验牙膏或水(对照)刷牙2分钟。然后,将10个牙本质盘浸泡在人工唾液中,另外10个牙本质盘浸泡在6%柠檬酸中以模拟口腔环境。在刷牙前以及每次处理后,使用流体过滤系统测量每个标本的牙本质渗透性。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察牙本质的形态变化。
两种牙膏均显著降低了牙本质渗透性,并且在扫描电子显微镜观察下在牙本质表面观察到结晶沉淀。在刷牙后以及人工唾液或酸浸泡后,两组牙膏在牙本质渗透性方面未发现显著差异。
两种牙膏引起的牙本质渗透性降低在刷牙后、人工唾液或柠檬酸浸泡后没有差异。