• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脱敏剂对口腔细菌抗菌效果的评估

Evaluation of Antibacterial Effectiveness of Desensitizers against Oral Bacteria.

作者信息

Duran Ismet, Sengun Abdulkadir, Hadimli Hasan Huseyin, Ulker Mustafa

机构信息

Assoc. Prof., Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2008 Jan;2(1):43-7.

PMID:19212508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2633153/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Desensitizers contribute to better clinical results by reducing the rate of cervical dentin sensitivity. However, information on their antibacterial effect is limited. This study examined the antibacterial activities of a triclosan containing (Seal & Protect), a benzalconium containing desensitizer (Micro Prime), a fluoride containing prophilaxy paste (Sultan Desensitizer), two fluoride containing varnishes (Cavity Shealth and Ultra EZ), and a dentin bonding primer (All Bond).

METHODS

The test materials were inserted in the wells of Muller Hinton agar plates inoculated with Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivarious, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The diameters of the inhibition zones produced around the materials were measured after 24 h of incubation. The results were analyzed by the Kruskal Wallis one way ANOVA and the Mann-Whitney tests at a significance level of P<.05.

RESULTS

Micro Prime Desensitizer containing benzalkonium chloride had the highest antibacterial effectiveness compared to other desensitizers used in this study. In addition, triclosan containing Seal & Protect and acidic components containing All Bond showed very high antibacterial efficacy. On the other hand, fluoride within both varnishes had little antibacterial effectiveness. However a fluoride component in a paste (Sultan Desensitizer) showed very high bactericidal effect.

CONCLUSIONS

All desensitizers except fluoride varnishes showed various degrees of antibacterial effect against the bacteria tested in this study. If antibacterial effect is also required from the desensitizers' clinicians should avoid use of varnishes.

摘要

目的

脱敏剂通过降低牙颈部牙本质敏感率有助于获得更好的临床效果。然而,关于其抗菌作用的信息有限。本研究检测了一种含三氯生的脱敏剂(Seal & Protect)、一种含苯扎氯铵的脱敏剂(Micro Prime)、一种含氟预防性糊剂(Sultan Desensitizer)、两种含氟 varnishes(Cavity Shealth 和 Ultra EZ)以及一种牙本质粘结剂(All Bond)的抗菌活性。

方法

将测试材料插入接种了变形链球菌、唾液链球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的穆勒 - 欣顿琼脂平板孔中。孵育 24 小时后测量材料周围产生的抑菌圈直径。结果采用 Kruskal Wallis 单因素方差分析和 Mann - Whitney 检验进行分析,显著性水平为 P <.05。

结果

与本研究中使用的其他脱敏剂相比,含苯扎氯铵的 Micro Prime 脱敏剂具有最高的抗菌效果。此外,含三氯生的 Seal & Protect 和含酸性成分的 All Bond 显示出非常高的抗菌功效。另一方面,两种 varnishes 中的氟几乎没有抗菌效果。然而,一种糊剂(Sultan Desensitizer)中的氟成分显示出非常高的杀菌效果。

结论

除氟 varnishes 外,所有脱敏剂对本研究中测试的细菌均显示出不同程度的抗菌作用。如果临床医生也需要脱敏剂具有抗菌作用,应避免使用 varnishes。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48b1/2633153/e25aa9825ef0/fig_1_page_45.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48b1/2633153/e25aa9825ef0/fig_1_page_45.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48b1/2633153/e25aa9825ef0/fig_1_page_45.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Antibacterial Effectiveness of Desensitizers against Oral Bacteria.脱敏剂对口腔细菌抗菌效果的评估
Eur J Dent. 2008 Jan;2(1):43-7.
2
The Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Methacryloxydodecyl Pyridinium Bromide and Non-methacryloxydodecyl Pyridinium Bromide Dentin Bonding Systems Using Two Different Techniques: An In vitro Study.使用两种不同技术对甲基丙烯酰氧基十二烷基溴化吡啶鎓和非甲基丙烯酰氧基十二烷基溴化吡啶鎓牙本质粘结系统抗菌活性的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Sep;6(5):60-5.
3
Comparison of antibacterial activity of two dentin bonding systems using agar well technique and tooth cavity model.使用琼脂孔技术和牙洞模型比较两种牙本质粘结系统的抗菌活性
J Dent. 2003 Feb;31(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00006-x.
4
Antibacterial activities of MDPB and fluoride in dentin bonding agents.牙本质粘结剂中MDPB与氟化物的抗菌活性
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2005 Sep;13(3):139-42.
5
The effect on shear bond strength of rewetting dry dentin with two desensitizers.两种脱敏剂对干燥牙本质再湿润后的剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):287-96.
6
Assessment of antibacterial properties of newer dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study.新型牙本质粘结剂抗菌性能的评估:一项体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jul;2(3):165-9. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.86444.
7
Effect of HEMA-containing dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of a resin cement.含甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯的牙本质脱敏剂对树脂水门汀剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Dent. 1997 Apr;10(2):62-5.
8
Evaluation of antibacterial activity of three dentin primers using an in vitro tooth model.使用体外牙齿模型评估三种牙本质粘结剂的抗菌活性。
Oper Dent. 1999 Sep-Oct;24(5):279-85.
9
Comparison of the antibacterial activity of different self-etching primers and adhesives.不同自酸蚀底漆和粘结剂抗菌活性的比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1;9(7):57-64.
10
Effect of different desensitizers on inhibition of bovine dentin demineralization: micro-computed tomography assessment.不同脱敏剂对牛牙本质脱矿抑制作用的影响:显微计算机断层扫描评估
Eur J Oral Sci. 2014 Dec;122(6):404-10. doi: 10.1111/eos.12155. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of antibacterial effects of pulp capping agents with direct contact test method.采用直接接触试验法评估盖髓剂的抗菌效果。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):95-99. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126256.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro dentine permeability evaluation of HEMA-based (desensitizing) products using split-chamber model following in vivo application in the dog.在犬体内应用后,使用分室模型对基于甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(脱敏)产品进行体外牙本质渗透性评估。
J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Jan;32(1):34-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01132.x.
2
The long-term effectiveness of five current desensitizing products on cervical dentine sensitivity.五种现有脱敏产品对颈部牙本质敏感的长期疗效。
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Apr;31(4):351-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01241.x.
3
The effect of tissue molecules on bacterial invasion of dentine.
组织分子对细菌侵入牙本质的影响。
Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2002 Feb;17(1):32-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0902-0055.2001.00090.x.
4
Penetration of bacteria in bovine root dentine in vitro.细菌在牛牙根牙本质中的体外渗透
Int Endod J. 2000 Jan;33(1):28-36. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00268.x.
5
Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites.玻璃离子水门汀、复合体及树脂复合材料的氟释放
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Jan;28(1):26-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00635.x.
6
Cytokine induction by Streptococcus mutans and pulpal pathogenesis.变形链球菌诱导的细胞因子与牙髓发病机制
Infect Immun. 2000 Dec;68(12):6785-9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6785-6789.2000.
7
Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms.暴露于致龋微生物的玻璃离子修复水门汀的抗菌活性。
Oper Dent. 1999 Sep-Oct;24(5):286-91.
8
Effect of four dental varnishes on the colonization of cariogenic bacteria on exposed sound root surfaces.四种牙科用清漆对暴露的健康牙根表面致龋菌定植的影响。
Caries Res. 2000 Jan-Feb;34(1):70-4. doi: 10.1159/000016572.
9
Antibacterial activity of proprietary self-etching primers.专利自酸蚀底漆的抗菌活性
Am J Dent. 1998 Jun;11(3):106-8.
10
Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study.转诊至专科牙周病科的患者群体中颈部牙本质敏感的临床评估:一项试点研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Sep;24(9):666-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00552.x.