Ramaswamy Vijay, Horton Jennifer, Vandermeer Ben, Buscemi Nina, Miller Steven, Yager Jerome
Section of Pediatric Neurosciences, Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Pediatr Neurol. 2009 Mar;40(3):215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2008.09.026.
Although neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is a common cause of childhood developmental disability, its timing, duration, and outcomes are poorly defined. Biomarkers serve as surrogates for disease injury, evolution, and outcome, but no tissue biomarker in routine clinical use can help predict outcomes in term newborn encephalopathy. We reviewed biomarkers in human term neonatal encephalopathy, to determine if current biomarkers are strong enough for clinical use as predictors of outcomes. A comprehensive search of databases identified 110 publications that met our inclusion criteria, i.e., (1) newborns at >36 weeks; (2) neonatal encephalopathy as defined by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; (3) the use of a serum, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid biomarker; and (4) reported outcomes beyond age 12 months. Of those 110 publications, 22 reported outcomes beyond age 12 months. In single reports, urine lactate (P < 0.001), first urine S100 (P < 0.0001), cord-blood interleukin-6 (P = 0.02), serum nonprotein-bound iron (P < 0.001), serum CD14 cell NFkappaB activation (P = 0.014), serum interleukin-8 (P = 0.03), and serum ionized calcium (P = 0.001) were potential predictors of death or abnormal outcomes. A meta-analysis identified serum interleukin-1b (P = 0.04, n = 3), serum interleukin-6 (P = 0.04, n = 2), cerebrospinal fluid neuron-specific enolase (P = 0.03, n = 3), and cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-1b (P = 0.003, n = 2) as putative predictors of abnormal outcomes in survivors, when measured before age 96 hours. Several serum, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of term neonatal encephalopathy may provide important information regarding long-term outcomes. None, however, were studied extensively enough to warrant routine clinical use. Validation of these markers, either alone or in combination, is required in the development of viable therapeutic interventions.
尽管新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病是儿童发育障碍的常见原因,但其发生时间、持续时间和预后仍不明确。生物标志物可作为疾病损伤、进展和预后的替代指标,但常规临床应用中的组织生物标志物均无法帮助预测足月儿脑病的预后。我们回顾了足月儿新生儿脑病的生物标志物,以确定当前的生物标志物是否强大到足以在临床上用作预后预测指标。对数据库进行全面检索后,确定了110篇符合我们纳入标准的文献,即:(1)孕周>36周的新生儿;(2)美国妇产科医师学会定义的新生儿脑病;(3)使用血清、尿液或脑脊液生物标志物;(4)报告了12个月龄以后的预后情况。在这110篇文献中,22篇报告了12个月龄以后的预后情况。在单项报告中,尿乳酸(P<0.001)、首次尿液S100(P<0.0001)、脐血白细胞介素-6(P=0.02)、血清非蛋白结合铁(P<0.001)、血清CD14细胞NFκB激活(P=0.014)、血清白细胞介素-8(P=0.03)和血清离子钙(P=)是死亡或异常预后的潜在预测指标。一项荟萃分析确定,在96小时龄之前测量时,血清白细胞介素-1β(P=0.04,n=3)、血清白细胞介素-6(P=0.04,n=2)、脑脊液神经元特异性烯醇化酶(P=0.03,n=3)和脑脊液白细胞介素-1β(P=0.003,n=2)是幸存者异常预后的推定预测指标。足月儿新生儿脑病的几种血清、尿液和脑脊液生物标志物可能提供有关长期预后的重要信息。然而,没有一种生物标志物得到了足够广泛的研究以保证其常规临床应用。在开发可行的治疗干预措施时,需要对这些标志物单独或联合进行验证。