De Vreese Leen
Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University (UGent), Blandijnberg 2, room 2.08, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Aug;12(3):345-53. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9184-0. Epub 2009 Feb 15.
Epidemiologists' discussions on causation are not always very enlightening with regard to the notion of 'cause' in epidemiology. Epidemiologists rightly work from a science-based approach to causation in epidemiology, but largely disagree about the matter. Disagreement may be partly due to confusion of the question of useful concepts for causal inference in epidemiological practice with the question of the metaphysical presuppositions of causal concepts used in epidemiology. In other words, epidemiologists seem to confuse the practical results of epidemiological research at the population level with the metaphysical views about the reality of disease causation at the individual level in their writings on causation.
流行病学家关于因果关系的讨论,在流行病学中“原因”这一概念方面,并不总是很有启发性。流行病学家正确地从基于科学的方法来探讨流行病学中的因果关系,但在这个问题上很大程度上存在分歧。分歧可能部分是由于将流行病学实践中因果推断的有用概念问题,与流行病学中所使用因果概念的形而上学预设问题相混淆。换句话说,在关于因果关系的著述中,流行病学家似乎将群体层面流行病学研究的实际结果,与个体层面关于疾病因果关系现实的形而上学观点相混淆。