Jeffreys Mona, Sarfati Diana, Stevanovic Vladimir, Tobias Martin, Lewis Chris, Pearce Neil, Blakely Tony
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whately Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):915-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0685. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
We examined socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in New Zealand among 132,006 people ages 15 to 99 years who had a cancer registered (1994-2003) and were followed up to 2004. Relative survival rates (RSR) were calculated using deprivation-specific life tables. A census-based measure of socioeconomic position (New Zealand deprivation based on the 1996 census) based on residence at the time of cancer registration was used. All RSRs were age-standardized, and further standardization was used to investigate the effect of extent of disease at diagnosis on survival. Weighted linear regression was used to estimate the deprivation gap (slope index of inequality) between the most and least deprived cases. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival were evident for all of the major cancer sites, with the deprivation gap being particularly high for prostate (-0.15), kidney and uterus (both -0.14), bladder (-0.12), colorectum (-0.10), and brain (+0.10). Accounting for extent of disease explained some of the inequalities in survival from breast and colorectal cancer and melanoma and all of the deprivation gaps in survival of cervical cancer; however, it did not affect RSRs for cancers of the kidney, uterus, and brain. No substantial differences between the total compared with the non-Māori population were found, indicating that the findings were not due to confounding by ethnicity. In summary, socioeconomic disparities in survival were consistent for nearly all cancer sites, persisted in ethnic-specific analyses, and were only partially explained by differential extent of disease at diagnosis. Further investigation of reasons for persisting inequalities is required.
我们对新西兰132,006名年龄在15至99岁之间、患有登记癌症(1994 - 2003年)且随访至2004年的人群的癌症生存情况中的社会经济不平等现象进行了研究。使用特定贫困程度的生命表计算相对生存率(RSR)。采用基于人口普查的社会经济地位衡量指标(基于1996年人口普查的新西兰贫困程度),该指标基于癌症登记时的居住地。所有RSR均进行了年龄标准化,并且进一步标准化用于研究诊断时疾病程度对生存的影响。使用加权线性回归来估计最贫困和最不贫困病例之间的贫困差距(不平等斜率指数)。所有主要癌症部位的癌症生存社会经济不平等现象都很明显,前列腺癌(-0.15)、肾癌和子宫癌(均为-0.14)、膀胱癌(-0.12)、结直肠癌(-0.10)和脑癌(+0.10)的贫困差距尤为高。考虑疾病程度解释了乳腺癌、结直肠癌和黑色素瘤生存方面的一些不平等现象以及宫颈癌生存方面的所有贫困差距;然而,它并未影响肾癌、子宫癌和脑癌的RSR。未发现总体人群与非毛利人群之间存在实质性差异,这表明研究结果并非由于种族混杂所致。总之,几乎所有癌症部位在生存方面的社会经济差异都是一致的,在按种族分类的分析中持续存在,并且仅部分由诊断时疾病程度的差异所解释。需要进一步调查持续存在不平等现象的原因。