Ju Xiao-Tang, Xing Guang-Xi, Chen Xin-Ping, Zhang Shao-Lin, Zhang Li-Juan, Liu Xue-Jun, Cui Zhen-Ling, Yin Bin, Christie Peter, Zhu Zhao-Liang, Zhang Fu-Suo
Key Laboratory of Plant and Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, China, and College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 3;106(9):3041-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813417106. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
Excessive N fertilization in intensive agricultural areas of China has resulted in serious environmental problems because of atmospheric, soil, and water enrichment with reactive N of agricultural origin. This study examines grain yields and N loss pathways using a synthetic approach in 2 of the most intensive double-cropping systems in China: waterlogged rice/upland wheat in the Taihu region of east China versus irrigated wheat/rainfed maize on the North China Plain. When compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization with 30-60% N savings, we found that current agricultural N practices with 550-600 kg of N per hectare fertilizer annually do not significantly increase crop yields but do lead to about 2 times larger N losses to the environment. The higher N loss rates and lower N retention rates indicate little utilization of residual N by the succeeding crop in rice/wheat systems in comparison with wheat/maize systems. Periodic waterlogging of upland systems caused large N losses by denitrification in the Taihu region. Calcareous soils and concentrated summer rainfall resulted in ammonia volatilization (19% for wheat and 24% for maize) and nitrate leaching being the main N loss pathways in wheat/maize systems. More than 2-fold increases in atmospheric deposition and irrigation water N reflect heavy air and water pollution and these have become important N sources to agricultural ecosystems. A better N balance can be achieved without sacrificing crop yields but significantly reducing environmental risk by adopting optimum N fertilization techniques, controlling the primary N loss pathways, and improving the performance of the agricultural Extension Service.
在中国集约化农业地区,过量施氮已导致严重的环境问题,因为农业源活性氮使大气、土壤和水体富营养化。本研究采用综合方法,在中国两个最集约化的双季种植系统中考察了粮食产量和氮素损失途径:中国东部太湖地区的淹水水稻/旱地小麦,以及华北平原的灌溉小麦/雨养玉米。与基于知识的最佳施氮量相比,氮肥用量节省了30%-60%,我们发现,目前每年每公顷施用550-600千克氮肥的农业氮素管理措施,并没有显著提高作物产量,但却导致向环境中流失的氮素增加了约两倍。与小麦/玉米系统相比,水稻/小麦系统中较高的氮素流失率和较低的氮素保持率表明,后茬作物对残留氮的利用率较低。旱地系统的周期性淹水导致太湖地区因反硝化作用造成大量氮素损失。石灰性土壤和夏季集中降雨导致氨挥发(小麦为19%,玉米为24%),硝酸盐淋失是小麦/玉米系统中主要的氮素损失途径。大气沉降和灌溉水中氮含量增加了两倍多,这反映出空气和水污染严重,这些已成为农业生态系统重要的氮源。通过采用最佳施氮技术、控制主要氮素损失途径以及提高农业推广服务的效能,在不牺牲作物产量的情况下,可以实现更好的氮素平衡,同时显著降低环境风险。