Lin Dusheng, Leung Christopher Kai Shun, Weinreb Robert N, Cheung Carol Yim Lui, Li Haitao, Lam Dennis Shun Chiu
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China.
J Glaucoma. 2009 Feb;18(2):101-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318179f879.
To evaluate and compare the longitudinal variability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) optic disc measurements.
A total of 25 normal and 50 glaucomatous eyes from 75 subjects were included in the analysis. The optic disc was measured by OCT and CSLO. Three separate measurements collected over an average period of 8.5+/-0.9 months were used to evaluate reproducibility. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between age, refraction, diagnosis (glaucoma or normal), visual field mean deviation, optic disc area, signal strength variance (OCT), optic disc area variance (OCT), image quality SD (CSLO), reference height variance (CSLO), and rim area variability.
The intraclass correlation coefficient of optic disc measurements (except for optic disc area) ranged between 0.86 and 0.95 for OCT and between 0.89 and 0.96 for CSLO. The intraclass correlation coefficient for rim area measurement was significantly higher in CSLO (0.95) than that of OCT (0.86, P<0.001). After adjustment for other predictors, optic disc area variance and reference height variance were the most important factors responsible for rim area variability in OCT and CSLO, respectively.
Although both OCT and CSLO have relatively low variability for optic disc measurements, CSLO demonstrates higher measurement reproducibility for rim area compared with OCT. Variations of disc area in OCT and reference height in CSLO constituted a significant proportion of the rim area variability during longitudinal assessment.
评估和比较光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和共焦扫描激光检眼镜(CSLO)对视盘测量的纵向变异性。
分析纳入了来自75名受试者的25只正常眼和50只青光眼眼。通过OCT和CSLO对视盘进行测量。在平均8.5±0.9个月的时间内收集的三次独立测量用于评估可重复性。进行单变量和多变量回归分析,以评估年龄、屈光不正、诊断(青光眼或正常)、视野平均偏差、视盘面积、信号强度方差(OCT)、视盘面积方差(OCT)、图像质量标准差(CSLO)、参考高度方差(CSLO)和边缘区域变异性之间的关联。
OCT对视盘测量(视盘面积除外)的组内相关系数在0.86至0.95之间,CSLO在0.89至0.96之间。CSLO测量边缘区域的组内相关系数(0.95)显著高于OCT(0.86,P<0.001)。在对其他预测因素进行调整后,视盘面积方差和参考高度方差分别是OCT和CSLO中边缘区域变异性的最重要因素。
尽管OCT和CSLO对视盘测量的变异性都相对较低,但与OCT相比,CSLO在边缘区域测量方面具有更高的测量可重复性。在纵向评估中,OCT中的视盘面积变化和CSLO中的参考高度变化在边缘区域变异性中占很大比例。