Bornstein Michael M, Stocker Bruce L, Seemann Rainer, Bürgin Walter B, Lussi Adrian
Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):24-31. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080310.
Sound epidemiologic data on halitosis are rare. We evaluated the prevalence of halitosis in a young male adult population in Switzerland using a standardized questionnaire and clinical examination.
Six hundred twenty-six Swiss Army recruits aged 18 to 25 years (mean: 20.3 years) were selected as study subjects. First, a standardized questionnaire focusing on dental hygiene, self-reported halitosis, smoking, and alcohol consumption was filled out by all participants. In the clinical examination, objective values for the presence of halitosis were gathered through an organoleptic assessment of the breath odor and the measurement of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs). Additionally, tongue coating, plaque index, and probing depths were evaluated for each recruit.
The questionnaire revealed that only 17% of all included recruits had never experienced halitosis. The organoleptic evaluation (grades 0 to 3) identified eight persons with grade 3, 148 persons with grade 2, and 424 persons with grade 1 or 0. The calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficient to evaluate the relationship among the three methods of assessing halitosis revealed little to no correlation. The organoleptic score showed high reproducibility (kappa = 0.79). Tongue coating was the only influencing factor found to contribute to higher organoleptic scores and higher VSC values.
Oral malodor seemed to pose an oral health problem for about one-fifth of 20-year-old Swiss males questioned. No correlation between self-reported halitosis and organoleptic or VSC measurements could be detected. Although the organoleptic method described here offers a high reproducibility, the lack of correlation between VSC values and organoleptic scores has to be critically addressed. For further studies assessing new organoleptic scores, a validated index should always be included as a direct control.
关于口臭的可靠流行病学数据很少。我们使用标准化问卷和临床检查评估了瑞士年轻成年男性人群中口臭的患病率。
选择626名年龄在18至25岁(平均20.3岁)的瑞士新兵作为研究对象。首先,所有参与者填写一份关于口腔卫生、自我报告的口臭、吸烟和饮酒情况的标准化问卷。在临床检查中,通过对口气气味的感官评估和挥发性硫化物(VSC)的测量收集口臭存在的客观值。此外,还对每位新兵的舌苔、菌斑指数和探诊深度进行了评估。
问卷显示,所有纳入的新兵中只有17%从未经历过口臭。感官评估(0至3级)发现8人评分为3级,148人评分为2级,424人评分为1级或0级。计算皮尔逊相关系数以评估三种口臭评估方法之间的关系,结果显示相关性很小或几乎没有相关性。感官评分显示出高再现性(kappa = 0.79)。舌苔是唯一被发现会导致更高感官评分和更高VSC值的影响因素。
对于约五分之一接受调查的20岁瑞士男性来说,口腔异味似乎构成了一个口腔健康问题。自我报告的口臭与感官或VSC测量之间未发现相关性。尽管此处描述的感官方法具有高再现性,但必须认真解决VSC值与感官评分之间缺乏相关性的问题。对于评估新感官评分的进一步研究,应始终纳入经过验证的指标作为直接对照。