Brown R R, Farrelly M A
National Urban Water Governance Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Water Sci Technol. 2009;59(4):653-60. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.022.
In a time of climate uncertainty and drought in Australia, improved urban stormwater quality management practices are required not only for protecting waterway health, but also as a fit-for-purpose supply source. To conceive of urban stormwater as an environmental threat as well as a water supply source requires a substantial shift in our traditional linear supply and wastewater structures towards more hybrid and complex infrastructure systems. To understand what drives and limits treatment technology adoption for stormwater management, over 800 urban water professionals in three Australian capital cities completed an online questionnaire survey in November 2006. Using the conceptual framework of receptivity assessment, the results revealed the professional community to be highly associated with the importance of improving stormwater quality for receiving waterway health, yet they do not consider that politicians share this perspective by placing a substantially lower level of importance on stormwater quality management. Significant acquisition barriers within each city, including institutional arrangements, costs, responsibilities, and regulations and approvals processes were all identified as constraining more sustainable practices. Capacity building programs, fostering greater socio-political capital and developing key demonstration projects with training events are recommended as useful policy interventions for addressing current institutional impediments.
在澳大利亚面临气候不确定性和干旱的时期,改善城市雨水质量管理措施不仅是保护水道健康所必需的,也是一种适用的供水来源。要将城市雨水既视为环境威胁又视为供水来源,就需要我们从传统的线性供水和废水结构大幅转向更混合、更复杂的基础设施系统。为了解推动和限制雨水管理处理技术采用的因素,2006年11月,澳大利亚三个首府城市的800多名城市水务专业人员完成了一项在线问卷调查。利用接受度评估的概念框架,结果显示专业群体高度认同改善雨水质量对受纳水道健康的重要性,但他们认为政治家们并不认同这一观点,政治家们对雨水质量管理的重视程度要低得多。每个城市内部的重大获取障碍,包括制度安排、成本、责任以及法规和审批程序,都被确定为限制更可持续做法的因素。建议开展能力建设项目、培养更多社会政治资本以及通过培训活动开展关键示范项目,作为解决当前制度障碍的有益政策干预措施。