Suppr超能文献

基于互联网的本科耳鼻喉科教育互动案例

Interactive Internet-based cases for undergraduate otolaryngology education.

作者信息

Kandasamy Thileeban, Fung Kevin

机构信息

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Head and Neck Oncology and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Mar;140(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.11.033.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of virtual-patient computer-assisted instruction (CAI) in pre-clerkship undergraduate otolaryngology education.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Second-year medical students at the University of Western Ontario, Canada, were randomized into two groups: group A was given a CAI module and group B was presented with two Internet review articles, both covered specific learning objectives for pediatric stridor. Students completed randomized pre- and post-tests and a questionnaire one week later.

RESULTS

Fifty-five students completed the study with 28 in group A and 27 in group B. Mean pretest scores were 59.1% in group A and 59.8% in group B (95% CI = -7.9% to 10.4%). Mean post-test scores were significantly elevated in group A (84.6%, P < 0.001) and group B (74.3%, P = 0.008). Group A had a significantly higher (P = 0.02) mean post-test score than group B (mean difference of 10.2%). Students spent significantly more time (P < 0.001) reading text articles (25.5 minutes) than completing the CAI (9.06 minutes). Forty-one (66%) students completed the survey. Thirty-six (88%) respondents indicated that they preferred CAI to online articles.

CONCLUSION

CAI is a feasible, effective, and efficient means of enhancing self-directed learning as supplementation to the pre-clerkship undergraduate otolaryngology curriculum.

摘要

目的

确定虚拟患者计算机辅助教学(CAI)在本科医学生耳鼻喉科实习前教育中的可行性和有效性。

研究设计

前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

研究对象与方法

加拿大西安大略大学的二年级医学生被随机分为两组:A组接受CAI模块,B组阅读两篇互联网综述文章,两组内容均涵盖小儿喘鸣的特定学习目标。学生完成随机的课前和课后测试,并在一周后填写问卷。

结果

55名学生完成了研究,A组28名,B组27名。A组的课前平均成绩为59.1%,B组为59.8%(95%可信区间=-7.9%至10.4%)。A组的课后平均成绩显著提高(84.6%,P<0.001),B组也显著提高(74.3%,P=0.008)。A组的课后平均成绩显著高于B组(P=0.02)(平均差异为10.2%)。学生阅读文本文章(25.5分钟)的时间明显多于完成CAI的时间(9.06分钟)(P<0.001)。41名(66%)学生完成了调查。36名(88%)受访者表示,他们更喜欢CAI而不是在线文章。

结论

作为本科医学生耳鼻喉科实习前课程的补充,CAI是一种可行、有效且高效的增强自主学习的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验