• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次结肠镜检查准备失败后再次准备的结果。

The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure.

作者信息

Ben-Horin Shomron, Bar-Meir Simon, Avidan Benjamin

机构信息

Current affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):626-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.027
PMID:19251002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are scant data regarding the outcome of consecutive repeated procedures in patients who failed to adequately clean their colon for colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome of a second colonoscopy after preparation-associated failure of the first colonoscopy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study in a tertiary-referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients with failure of colonoscopy because of poor preparation within a 1-year period.

RESULTS

Of a total of 6990 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 307 procedures (4.4%) failed because of inadequate preparation. Data on subsequent repeated colonoscopies were available for 235 patients. The repeated procedure again failed because of unsatisfactory preparation in 54 of these patients (23%). The failure rate in subsequent third and fourth colonoscopies was also high (more than 25%). Of the various patient and procedure-related parameters examined, only the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) was found to be predictive of a failed repeated preparation (odds ratio [OR] 3.2 [95% CI, 1.6-6.3], P < .001). In contrast, a next-day colonoscopy after failure of the index procedure was associated with a reduced risk of unsatisfactory second preparation (OR 0.31 [95% CI, 0.1-0.92], P = .03).

LIMITATIONS

Validated data on the specific bowel purgatives used were not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a fourth of patients with an unacceptable colonic preparation will also fail the repeated colonoscopy, and patients who use CCB are at particular risk for failure. Strategies to manage this difficult-to-treat patient group should be investigated and may possibly include a preference for next-day colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

关于结肠镜检查前肠道准备不充分的患者连续重复检查结果的数据很少。

目的

探讨首次结肠镜检查因准备相关失败后第二次结肠镜检查的结果。

设计与环境

在一家三级转诊中心进行的回顾性研究。

患者

所有在1年内因准备不佳导致结肠镜检查失败的患者。

结果

在研究期间进行的总共6990次结肠镜检查中,307例(4.4%)因准备不充分而失败。235例患者有后续重复结肠镜检查的数据。其中54例(23%)患者的重复检查因准备不充分再次失败。后续第三次和第四次结肠镜检查的失败率也很高(超过25%)。在检查的各种患者和检查相关参数中,仅发现使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)可预测重复准备失败(比值比[OR]3.2[95%CI,1.6 - 6.3],P <.001)。相比之下,首次检查失败后次日进行结肠镜检查与第二次准备不充分的风险降低相关(OR 0.31[95%CI,0.1 - 0.92],P =.03)。

局限性

没有关于所使用的特定肠道泻药的验证数据。

结论

几乎四分之一肠道准备不合格的患者重复结肠镜检查也会失败,使用CCB的患者失败风险尤其高。应研究管理这一难以治疗患者群体的策略,可能包括优先选择次日结肠镜检查。

相似文献

1
The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure.首次结肠镜检查准备失败后再次准备的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):626-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.027.
2
Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies.下午进行的结肠镜检查比上午进行的结肠镜检查失败率更高。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2726-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00887.x.
3
Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality.肠道准备完成至结肠镜检查开始之间的间隔时间可预测肠道准备质量。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.047.
4
Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea.使用聚乙二醇肠道准备不充分的患者预测因素:韩国的一项前瞻性研究
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 May-Jun;43(5):448-52. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181662442.
5
Stool consistency and stool frequency are excellent clinical markers for adequate colon preparation after polyethylene glycol 3350 cleansing protocol: a prospective clinical study in children.在聚乙二醇3350清洁方案后,粪便稠度和排便频率是儿童充分肠道准备的优秀临床指标:一项前瞻性临床研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Dec;68(6):1131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.026. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
6
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的预测因素。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;96(6):1797-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03874.x.
7
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
8
One-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350: an effective regimen for colonoscopy in children.聚乙二醇 3350 一日肠道准备:儿童结肠镜检查的有效方案。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):573-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.042.
9
Predictors of failed colonoscopy in nonagenarians: a single-center experience.百岁老人结肠镜检查失败的预测因素:单中心经验
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr;41(4):388-93. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225666.46050.78.
10
Audit of bowel preparation with Picolax (sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate) for colonoscopy.使用匹可硫酸钠(比沙可啶钠加枸橼酸镁)进行结肠镜检查肠道准备的审计。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 May;60(5):602-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00772.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The results of the same day and appointment colonoscopy in inadequate bowel cleansing; a randomized controlled trial.肠道准备不充分情况下当日结肠镜检查与预约结肠镜检查的结果:一项随机对照试验
Turk J Surg. 2025 Feb 27;41(1):61-68. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6541.
2
Same-day yoga-based Laghu Shankhaprakshalana versus standard polyethylene glycol for rescue colonoscopy in inadequate bowel preparation-Feasibility and cost-effectiveness.基于瑜伽的当日简易结肠灌洗法与标准聚乙二醇用于肠道准备不充分时的补救性结肠镜检查——可行性与成本效益
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct;43(5):1059-1061. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01638-7.
3
High-dose polyethylene glycol-3350 and gatorade solutions for patients with previous inadequate bowel preparations for colonoscopy are safe and effective.
高剂量聚乙二醇-3350 和佳得乐溶液对结肠镜检查前肠道准备不充分的患者是安全有效的。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 May 11;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02663-0.
4
Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature.影响结肠镜检查困难患者肠道准备质量的因素:来自文献的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 21;29(11):1685-1707. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1685.
5
The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation.确定理想肠道准备方法的未满足需求。
JGH Open. 2021 Sep 17;5(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12653. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Educational nurse-led telephone intervention shortly before colonoscopy as a salvage strategy after previous bowel preparation failure: a multicenter randomized trial.结肠镜检查前教育护士电话干预作为既往肠道准备失败后的补救策略:一项多中心随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2020 Nov;52(11):1026-1035. doi: 10.1055/a-1178-9844. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
7
Does It work in Clinical Practice? A Comparison of Colonoscopy Cleansing Effectiveness in Clinical Practice Versus Efficacy from Selected Prospective Trials.它在临床实践中有效吗?临床实践中结肠镜检查肠道准备效果与部分前瞻性试验疗效的比较。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;3(3):111-119. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy070. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Multicentre endoscopist-blinded randomised clinical trial to compare two bowel preparations after a colonoscopy with inadequate cleansing: a study protocol.多中心内镜医师盲法随机临床试验比较结肠镜检查后两种肠道准备不充分的情况:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e029573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029573.
9
Efficacy of 0.5-L 1-L polyethylene glycol containing ascorbic acid as additional colon cleansing methods for inadequate bowel preparation as expected by last stool examination before colonoscopy.0.5升和1升含抗坏血酸的聚乙二醇作为结肠镜检查前末次粪便检查提示肠道准备不充分时的额外结肠清洁方法的疗效。
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jan 6;7(1):39-48. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i1.39.
10
Bowel preparation: The elderly, the hospitalized, and the colonoscope.肠道准备:老年人、住院患者与结肠镜检查
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-74. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_137_18.