Suppr超能文献

首次结肠镜检查准备失败后再次准备的结果。

The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure.

作者信息

Ben-Horin Shomron, Bar-Meir Simon, Avidan Benjamin

机构信息

Current affiliations: Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):626-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.027.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are scant data regarding the outcome of consecutive repeated procedures in patients who failed to adequately clean their colon for colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome of a second colonoscopy after preparation-associated failure of the first colonoscopy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study in a tertiary-referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients with failure of colonoscopy because of poor preparation within a 1-year period.

RESULTS

Of a total of 6990 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 307 procedures (4.4%) failed because of inadequate preparation. Data on subsequent repeated colonoscopies were available for 235 patients. The repeated procedure again failed because of unsatisfactory preparation in 54 of these patients (23%). The failure rate in subsequent third and fourth colonoscopies was also high (more than 25%). Of the various patient and procedure-related parameters examined, only the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) was found to be predictive of a failed repeated preparation (odds ratio [OR] 3.2 [95% CI, 1.6-6.3], P < .001). In contrast, a next-day colonoscopy after failure of the index procedure was associated with a reduced risk of unsatisfactory second preparation (OR 0.31 [95% CI, 0.1-0.92], P = .03).

LIMITATIONS

Validated data on the specific bowel purgatives used were not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a fourth of patients with an unacceptable colonic preparation will also fail the repeated colonoscopy, and patients who use CCB are at particular risk for failure. Strategies to manage this difficult-to-treat patient group should be investigated and may possibly include a preference for next-day colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

关于结肠镜检查前肠道准备不充分的患者连续重复检查结果的数据很少。

目的

探讨首次结肠镜检查因准备相关失败后第二次结肠镜检查的结果。

设计与环境

在一家三级转诊中心进行的回顾性研究。

患者

所有在1年内因准备不佳导致结肠镜检查失败的患者。

结果

在研究期间进行的总共6990次结肠镜检查中,307例(4.4%)因准备不充分而失败。235例患者有后续重复结肠镜检查的数据。其中54例(23%)患者的重复检查因准备不充分再次失败。后续第三次和第四次结肠镜检查的失败率也很高(超过25%)。在检查的各种患者和检查相关参数中,仅发现使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)可预测重复准备失败(比值比[OR]3.2[95%CI,1.6 - 6.3],P <.001)。相比之下,首次检查失败后次日进行结肠镜检查与第二次准备不充分的风险降低相关(OR 0.31[95%CI,0.1 - 0.92],P =.03)。

局限性

没有关于所使用的特定肠道泻药的验证数据。

结论

几乎四分之一肠道准备不合格的患者重复结肠镜检查也会失败,使用CCB的患者失败风险尤其高。应研究管理这一难以治疗患者群体的策略,可能包括优先选择次日结肠镜检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验