Sakthong Phantipa
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jun;91 Suppl 2:S43-52.
The utility approach to assessing health-related quality of life is the most widely used technique for assessing preferences for health outcomes in the economic evaluation of health care. The scale for utility scores assigns a value of 1.0 to perfect health and 0.0 to death. The utility scores are employed to weigh time spent in each health state to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, which is used as the denominator in cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Utility scores are obtained through direct assessments using techniques such as standard gamble (SG), time-trade off (TTO), and visual analog scale (VAS), or by using multi-attribute systems such as the Health Utilities Index (HUI) or EuroQol (EQ-5D). According to international HE guidelines, the most preferred utility methods are SG and TTO, followed by EQ-5D, VAS and HUI, respectively In Thailand, the EQ-5D is the most recommended utility method because it has acceptable feasibility and validity.
在医疗保健的经济评估中,评估与健康相关的生活质量的效用方法是评估健康结果偏好时使用最广泛的技术。效用评分量表将完美健康的价值设定为1.0,将死亡的价值设定为0.0。效用评分用于权衡在每种健康状态下花费的时间,以估计获得的质量调整生命年(QALY),QALY在成本效用分析和成本效益分析中用作分母。效用评分通过使用标准博弈(SG)、时间权衡(TTO)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)等技术进行直接评估获得,或者通过使用多属性系统(如健康效用指数(HUI)或欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D))获得。根据国际卫生经济学指南,最受青睐的效用方法依次是SG和TTO,其次分别是EQ-5D、VAS和HUI。在泰国,EQ-5D是最推荐的效用方法,因为它具有可接受的可行性和有效性。