Suppr超能文献

在线焦点小组作为一种在难以纳入的人群中收集数据的工具:来自儿科肿瘤学的实例

Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.

作者信息

Tates Kiek, Zwaanswijk Marieke, Otten Roel, van Dulmen Sandra, Hoogerbrugge Peter M, Kamps Willem A, Bensing Jozien M

机构信息

NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Mar 3;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology.

METHODS

Qualitative study consisting of separate moderated asynchronous online discussion groups with 7 paediatric cancer patients (aged 8-17), 11 parents, and 18 survivors of childhood cancer (aged 8-17 at diagnosis).

RESULTS

All three participant groups could be actively engaged over a one-week period. Respondents highly valued the flexibility and convenience of logging in at their own time and place to join the discussion. Adolescent patients and survivors emphasized that the anonymity experienced made them feel comfortable to express their views in detail. The findings indicate a strong preference for online group discussions across all participant groups.

CONCLUSION

The findings show that online focus group methodology is a feasible tool for collecting qualitative data within the setting of paediatric oncology, and may offer new opportunities to collect data in other hard-to-include populations. The evaluations seem to indicate that the online group discussions have given participants an opportunity to articulate their experiences and views in a way they might not have done in a traditional group discussion.

摘要

背景

本文旨在描述和评估儿科肿瘤学背景下在线焦点小组讨论的方法。

方法

定性研究,由分别针对7名儿科癌症患者(8 - 17岁)、11名家长以及18名儿童癌症幸存者(诊断时年龄为8 - 17岁)的有主持人的异步在线讨论小组组成。

结果

所有三个参与群体都能在一周时间内积极参与。受访者高度重视能在自己方便的时间和地点登录参与讨论的灵活性和便利性。青少年患者和幸存者强调,所体验到的匿名性让他们能够自在地详细表达自己的观点。研究结果表明所有参与群体都强烈倾向于在线小组讨论。

结论

研究结果表明,在线焦点小组方法是在儿科肿瘤学背景下收集定性数据的可行工具,并且可能为在其他难以纳入的人群中收集数据提供新机会。评估似乎表明,在线小组讨论让参与者有机会以一种他们在传统小组讨论中可能不会采用的方式阐明自己的经历和观点。

相似文献

6
Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group.网络空间中的互动:一个在线焦点小组。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Feb;49(4):414-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03305.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Methodologic challenges of e-health research.
Eval Program Plann. 2006 Nov;29(4):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
4
Challenges and opportunities of eHealth research.电子健康研究的挑战与机遇。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.016.
7
Using the Internet to conduct research.利用互联网进行研究。
Nurse Res. 2005;13(2):55-70. doi: 10.7748/nr2005.10.13.2.55.c5968.
8
Synchronous computer mediated group discussion.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;23(6):330-4. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200511000-00010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验