Mazzola Mark
USDA-ARS, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
J Nematol. 2007 Sep;39(3):213-20.
Naturally occurring disease-suppressive soils have been documented in a variety of cropping systems, and in many instances the biological attributes contributing to suppressiveness have been identified. While these studies have often yielded an understanding of operative mechanisms leading to the suppressive state, significant difficulty has been realized in the transfer of this knowledge into achieving effective field-level disease control. Early efforts focused on the inundative application of individual or mixtures of microbial strains recovered from these systems and known to function in specific soil suppressiveness. However, the introduction of biological agents into non-native soil ecosystems typically yielded inconsistent levels of disease control. Of late, greater emphasis has been placed on manipulation of the cropping system to manage resident beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms as a means to suppress soilborne plant pathogens. One such strategy is the cropping of specific plant species or genotypes or the application of soil amendments with the goal of selectively enhancing disease-suppressive rhizobacteria communities. This approach has been utilized in a system attempting to employ biological elements resident to orchard ecosystems as a means to control the biologically complex phenomenon termed apple replant disease. Cropping of wheat in apple orchard soils prior to re-planting the site to apple provided control of the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG-5. Disease control was elicited in a wheat cultivar-specific manner and functioned through transformation of the fluorescent pseudomonad population colonizing the rhizosphere of apple. Wheat cultivars that induced disease suppression enhanced populations of specific fluorescent pseudomonad genotypes with antagonistic activity toward R. solani AG-5, but cultivars that did not elicit a disease-suppressive soil did not modify the antagonistic capacity of this bacterial community. Alternatively, brassicaceae seed meal amendments were utilized to develop soil suppressiveness toward R. solani. Suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot in response to seed meal amendment required the activity of the resident soil microbiota and was associated with elevated populations of Streptomyces spp. recovered from the apple rhizosphere. Application of individual Streptomyces spp. to soil systems provided control of R. solani to a level and in a manner equivalent to that obtained with the seed meal amendment. These and other examples suggest that management of resident plant-beneficial rhizobacteria may be a viable method for control of specific soilborne plant pathogens.
在多种种植系统中都有天然存在的抑病土壤的记录,并且在许多情况下,已经确定了导致土壤抑制性的生物学特性。虽然这些研究常常使人们了解了导致抑制状态的作用机制,但在将这些知识转化为有效的田间病害防治方面却遇到了很大困难。早期的努力集中在大量施用从这些系统中分离出的、已知在特定土壤抑制中起作用的单个或混合微生物菌株。然而,将生物制剂引入非原生土壤生态系统通常会导致病害防治效果不一致。最近,人们更加重视对种植系统的调控,以管理根际有益微生物群落,作为抑制土传植物病原菌的一种手段。一种这样的策略是种植特定的植物物种或基因型,或施用土壤改良剂,目的是选择性地增强抑病根际细菌群落。这种方法已在一个试图利用果园生态系统中的生物元素来控制被称为苹果再植病的生物复杂现象的系统中得到应用。在重新种植苹果之前,在苹果园土壤中种植小麦可以控制真菌病原菌立枯丝核菌AG-5。病害防治以小麦品种特异性的方式发挥作用,并通过转化定殖在苹果根际的荧光假单胞菌群体来实现。诱导病害抑制的小麦品种增加了对立枯丝核菌AG-5具有拮抗活性的特定荧光假单胞菌基因型的数量,但未引发抑病土壤的品种并未改变该细菌群落的拮抗能力。另外,利用十字花科种子粉改良剂来培育对立枯丝核菌的土壤抑制性。响应种子粉改良剂对立枯丝核菌根腐病的抑制作用需要土壤微生物群落的活性,并与从苹果根际分离出的链霉菌属数量增加有关。将单个链霉菌属菌株应用于土壤系统,对立枯丝核菌的防治水平和方式与种子粉改良剂相当。这些以及其他例子表明,管理根际有益植物细菌可能是控制特定土传植物病原菌的一种可行方法。