• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Manipulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities to induce suppressive soils.通过调控根际细菌群落诱导形成抑病土壤。
J Nematol. 2007 Sep;39(3):213-20.
2
Wheat Genotype-Specific Induction of Soil Microbial Communities Suppressive to Disease Incited by Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Group (AG)-5 and AG-8.小麦基因型特异性诱导土壤微生物群落抑制由 Rhizoctonia solani 吻合群(AG)-5 和 AG-8 引起的病害。
Phytopathology. 2002 Dec;92(12):1300-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1300.
3
Mechanisms of natural soil suppressiveness to soilborne diseases.天然土壤对土传病害的抑制机制。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):557-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1020557523557.
4
Cultural management of microbial community structure to enhance growth of apple in replant soils.文化管理微生物群落结构,以促进苹果在重茬土壤中的生长。
Phytopathology. 2002 Dec;92(12):1363-6. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1363.
5
Mechanism of action and efficacy of seed meal-induced pathogen suppression differ in a brassicaceae species and time-dependent manner.种子粉诱导的病原菌抑制作用的作用机制和功效在芸薹属物种和时间依赖性方面存在差异。
Phytopathology. 2007 Apr;97(4):454-60. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0454.
6
Comparative Metatranscriptomics of Wheat Rhizosphere Microbiomes in Disease Suppressive and Non-suppressive Soils for AG8.针对AG8,对病害抑制性土壤和非抑制性土壤中小麦根际微生物群落的比较宏转录组学研究
Front Microbiol. 2018 May 4;9:859. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00859. eCollection 2018.
7
Impact of wheat cultivation on microbial communities from replant soils and apple growth in greenhouse trials.小麦种植对温室试验中重茬土壤微生物群落和苹果生长的影响。
Phytopathology. 2000 Feb;90(2):114-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.2.114.
8
Carbon Source-Dependent Effects of Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation on Soil Microbiome and Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani AG-5 and Pratylenchus penetrans.厌氧土壤消毒对土壤微生物群落以及立枯丝核菌AG-5和穿刺短体线虫抑制作用的碳源依赖性效应
Phytopathology. 2016 Sep;106(9):1015-28. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-15-0329-R. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
9
Interaction of Brassicaceae Seed Meal Soil Amendment and Apple Rootstock Genotype on Microbiome Structure and Replant Disease Suppression.十字花科种子粪肥土壤改良剂与苹果砧木基因型对微生物组结构和再植病害抑制的相互作用。
Phytopathology. 2019 Apr;109(4):607-614. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0230-R. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
Transformation of soil microbial community structure and rhizoctonia-suppressive potential in response to apple roots.土壤微生物群落结构的转化及其对苹果根系根腐病抑制潜力的响应
Phytopathology. 1999 Oct;89(10):920-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.10.920.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid and sustained differentiation of disease-suppressive phyllosphere microbiomes in tomato following experimental microbiome selection.实验性微生物群落选择后,番茄叶际疾病抑制性微生物群落的快速持续分化
Environ Microbiome. 2025 Jul 1;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40793-025-00734-1.
2
Fungicide use intensity influences the soil microbiome and links to fungal disease suppressiveness in amenity turfgrass.杀菌剂使用强度影响土壤微生物群落,并与观赏性草坪草的真菌病害抑制能力相关。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025 Mar 19;91(3):e0177124. doi: 10.1128/aem.01771-24. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Transplantation of soil from organic field confers disease suppressive ability to conducive soil.有机田土壤的移植赋予了促进土壤的疾病抑制能力。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 28;40(4):112. doi: 10.1007/s11274-024-03895-2.
4
Partitioning the Effects of Soil Legacy and Pathogen Exposure Determining Soil Suppressiveness via Induced Systemic Resistance.通过诱导系统抗性划分土壤遗留效应和病原体暴露对土壤抑制性的影响
Plants (Basel). 2022 Oct 23;11(21):2816. doi: 10.3390/plants11212816.
5
Integrated Pest Management of Wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) and the Rhizosphere in Agroecosystems.农业生态系统中线虫(鞘翅目:叩头甲科)与根际的综合害虫管理
Insects. 2022 Aug 25;13(9):769. doi: 10.3390/insects13090769.
6
Disease-Suppressive Soils-Beyond Food Production: a Critical Review.抑病土壤——超越粮食生产:批判性综述
J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(2):1437-1465. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00451-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
7
Microbe to Microbiome: A Paradigm Shift in the Application of Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture.从微生物到微生物群落:微生物在可持续农业应用中的范式转变
Front Microbiol. 2020 Dec 21;11:622926. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.622926. eCollection 2020.
8
Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression.生物有机肥料刺激本土土壤假单胞菌种群,从而增强植物病害的抑制效果。
Microbiome. 2020 Sep 22;8(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00892-z.
9
Soil acidification amendments change the rhizosphere bacterial community of tobacco in a bacterial wilt affected field.土壤酸化改良剂会改变感青枯病烟田根际细菌群落。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Nov;102(22):9781-9791. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9347-0. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Comparative Microbiome Analysis of a Fusarium Wilt Suppressive Soil and a Fusarium Wilt Conducive Soil From the Châteaurenard Region.来自沙托雷诺地区的枯萎病抑制性土壤和枯萎病易感性土壤的微生物群落比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 4;9:568. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00568. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Composted Municipal Waste Reduces Infection of Citrus Seedlings by Phytophthora nicotianae.堆肥化城市垃圾可减少烟草疫霉对柑橘幼苗的感染。
Plant Dis. 1998 Jun;82(6):683-688. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.6.683.
2
Frequency, Virulence, and Metalaxyl Sensitivity of Pythium spp. Isolated from Apple Roots Under Conventional and Organic Production Systems.从常规和有机生产系统下苹果根系分离出的腐霉菌的频率、毒力及对甲霜灵的敏感性
Plant Dis. 2002 Jun;86(6):669-675. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.6.669.
3
Comparative Field Efficacy of Management Strategies Containing Brassica napus Seed Meal or Green Manure for the Control of Apple Replant Disease.含油菜籽粕或绿肥的管理策略对苹果再植病防治的田间对比效果
Plant Dis. 2005 Nov;89(11):1207-1213. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-1207.
4
Elucidation of the microbial complex having a causal role in the development of apple replant disease in washington.阐明与华盛顿苹果再植病发病有因果关系的微生物复合体。
Phytopathology. 1998 Sep;88(9):930-8. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.9.930.
5
Biological Suppression and Natural Population Decline of Heterodera schachtii in a California Field.加利福尼亚田间甜菜孢囊线虫的生物抑制和自然种群衰退。
Phytopathology. 1999 May;89(5):434-40. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.5.434.
6
Transformation of soil microbial community structure and rhizoctonia-suppressive potential in response to apple roots.土壤微生物群落结构的转化及其对苹果根系根腐病抑制潜力的响应
Phytopathology. 1999 Oct;89(10):920-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.10.920.
7
Impact of wheat cultivation on microbial communities from replant soils and apple growth in greenhouse trials.小麦种植对温室试验中重茬土壤微生物群落和苹果生长的影响。
Phytopathology. 2000 Feb;90(2):114-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.2.114.
8
Frequency, Diversity, and Activity of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol-Producing Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in Dutch Take-all Decline Soils.2,4-二乙酰基间苯三酚产生荧光假单胞菌在荷兰小麦全蚀病衰退土壤中的频率、多样性和活性。
Phytopathology. 2003 Jan;93(1):54-63. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.1.54.
9
Green manures and crop sequences influence potato diseases and pathogen inhibitory activity of indigenous streptomycetes.绿肥和作物轮作影响马铃薯病害和土著链霉菌的抑菌活性。
Phytopathology. 2005 Feb;95(2):178-85. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-95-0178.
10
Wheat Genotype-Specific Induction of Soil Microbial Communities Suppressive to Disease Incited by Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Group (AG)-5 and AG-8.小麦基因型特异性诱导土壤微生物群落抑制由 Rhizoctonia solani 吻合群(AG)-5 和 AG-8 引起的病害。
Phytopathology. 2002 Dec;92(12):1300-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1300.

通过调控根际细菌群落诱导形成抑病土壤。

Manipulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities to induce suppressive soils.

作者信息

Mazzola Mark

机构信息

USDA-ARS, Wenatchee, WA 98801.

出版信息

J Nematol. 2007 Sep;39(3):213-20.

PMID:19259490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2586500/
Abstract

Naturally occurring disease-suppressive soils have been documented in a variety of cropping systems, and in many instances the biological attributes contributing to suppressiveness have been identified. While these studies have often yielded an understanding of operative mechanisms leading to the suppressive state, significant difficulty has been realized in the transfer of this knowledge into achieving effective field-level disease control. Early efforts focused on the inundative application of individual or mixtures of microbial strains recovered from these systems and known to function in specific soil suppressiveness. However, the introduction of biological agents into non-native soil ecosystems typically yielded inconsistent levels of disease control. Of late, greater emphasis has been placed on manipulation of the cropping system to manage resident beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms as a means to suppress soilborne plant pathogens. One such strategy is the cropping of specific plant species or genotypes or the application of soil amendments with the goal of selectively enhancing disease-suppressive rhizobacteria communities. This approach has been utilized in a system attempting to employ biological elements resident to orchard ecosystems as a means to control the biologically complex phenomenon termed apple replant disease. Cropping of wheat in apple orchard soils prior to re-planting the site to apple provided control of the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG-5. Disease control was elicited in a wheat cultivar-specific manner and functioned through transformation of the fluorescent pseudomonad population colonizing the rhizosphere of apple. Wheat cultivars that induced disease suppression enhanced populations of specific fluorescent pseudomonad genotypes with antagonistic activity toward R. solani AG-5, but cultivars that did not elicit a disease-suppressive soil did not modify the antagonistic capacity of this bacterial community. Alternatively, brassicaceae seed meal amendments were utilized to develop soil suppressiveness toward R. solani. Suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot in response to seed meal amendment required the activity of the resident soil microbiota and was associated with elevated populations of Streptomyces spp. recovered from the apple rhizosphere. Application of individual Streptomyces spp. to soil systems provided control of R. solani to a level and in a manner equivalent to that obtained with the seed meal amendment. These and other examples suggest that management of resident plant-beneficial rhizobacteria may be a viable method for control of specific soilborne plant pathogens.

摘要

在多种种植系统中都有天然存在的抑病土壤的记录,并且在许多情况下,已经确定了导致土壤抑制性的生物学特性。虽然这些研究常常使人们了解了导致抑制状态的作用机制,但在将这些知识转化为有效的田间病害防治方面却遇到了很大困难。早期的努力集中在大量施用从这些系统中分离出的、已知在特定土壤抑制中起作用的单个或混合微生物菌株。然而,将生物制剂引入非原生土壤生态系统通常会导致病害防治效果不一致。最近,人们更加重视对种植系统的调控,以管理根际有益微生物群落,作为抑制土传植物病原菌的一种手段。一种这样的策略是种植特定的植物物种或基因型,或施用土壤改良剂,目的是选择性地增强抑病根际细菌群落。这种方法已在一个试图利用果园生态系统中的生物元素来控制被称为苹果再植病的生物复杂现象的系统中得到应用。在重新种植苹果之前,在苹果园土壤中种植小麦可以控制真菌病原菌立枯丝核菌AG-5。病害防治以小麦品种特异性的方式发挥作用,并通过转化定殖在苹果根际的荧光假单胞菌群体来实现。诱导病害抑制的小麦品种增加了对立枯丝核菌AG-5具有拮抗活性的特定荧光假单胞菌基因型的数量,但未引发抑病土壤的品种并未改变该细菌群落的拮抗能力。另外,利用十字花科种子粉改良剂来培育对立枯丝核菌的土壤抑制性。响应种子粉改良剂对立枯丝核菌根腐病的抑制作用需要土壤微生物群落的活性,并与从苹果根际分离出的链霉菌属数量增加有关。将单个链霉菌属菌株应用于土壤系统,对立枯丝核菌的防治水平和方式与种子粉改良剂相当。这些以及其他例子表明,管理根际有益植物细菌可能是控制特定土传植物病原菌的一种可行方法。