• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑病土壤——超越粮食生产:批判性综述

Disease-Suppressive Soils-Beyond Food Production: a Critical Review.

作者信息

Jayaraman Somasundaram, Naorem A K, Lal Rattan, Dalal Ram C, Sinha N K, Patra A K, Chaudhari S K

机构信息

ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462038 India.

ICAR- Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station-Kukma, Bhuj, Gujarat 370105 India.

出版信息

J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(2):1437-1465. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00451-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s42729-021-00451-x
PMID:33746349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7953945/
Abstract

In the pursuit of higher food production and economic growth and increasing population, we have often jeopardized natural resources such as soil, water, vegetation, and biodiversity at an alarming rate. In this process, wider adoption of intensive farming practices, namely changes in land use, imbalanced fertilizer application, minimum addition of organic residue/manure, and non-adoption of site-specific conservation measures, has led to declining in soil health and land degradation in an irreversible manner. In addition, increasing use of pesticides, coupled with soil and water pollution, has led the researchers to search for an environmental-friendly and cost-effective alternatives to controlling soil-borne diseases that are difficult to control, and which significantly limit agricultural productivity. Since the 1960s, disease-suppressive soils (DSS) have been identified and studied around the world. Soil disease suppression is the reduction in the incidence of soil-borne diseases even in the presence of a host plant and inoculum in the soil. The disease-suppressive capacity is mainly attributed to diverse microbial communities present in the soil that could act against soil-borne pathogens in multifaceted ways. The beneficial microorganisms employ some specific functions such as antibiosis, parasitism, competition for resources, and predation. However, there has been increasing evidence on the role of soil abiotic factors that largely influence the disease suppression. The intricate interactions of the soil, plant, and environmental components in a disease triangle make this process complex yet crucial to study to reduce disease incidence. Increasing resistance of the pathogen to presently available chemicals has led to the shift from culturable microbes to unexplored and unculturable microbes. Agricultural management practices such as tillage, fertilization, manures, irrigation, and amendment applications significantly alter the soil physicochemical environment and influence the growth and behaviour of antagonistic microbes. Plant factors such as age, type of crop, and root behaviour of the plant could stimulate or limit the diversity and structure of soil microorganisms in the rhizosphere. Further, identification and in-depth of disease-suppressive soils could lead to the discovery of more beneficial microorganisms with novel anti-microbial and plant promoting traits. To date, several microbial species have been isolated and proposed as key contributors in disease suppression, but the complexities as well as the mechanisms of the microbial and abiotic interactions remain elusive for most of the disease-suppressive soils. Thus, this review critically explores disease-suppressive attributes in soils, mechanisms involved, and biotic and abiotic factors affecting DSS and also briefly reviewing soil microbiome for anti-microbial drugs, in fact, a consequence of DSS phenomenon.

摘要

为了追求更高的粮食产量、经济增长以及应对不断增长的人口,我们常常以惊人的速度破坏土壤、水、植被和生物多样性等自然资源。在这个过程中,集约化农业 practices 的更广泛采用,即土地利用变化、肥料施用不均衡、有机残留物/粪肥添加量极少以及未采用因地制宜的保护措施,已导致土壤健康状况下降和土地退化,且这种退化是不可逆转的。此外,农药使用的增加,再加上土壤和水污染,促使研究人员寻找环境友好且具有成本效益的替代方法来控制难以控制的土传病害,这些病害严重限制了农业生产力。自20世纪60年代以来,世界各地已识别并研究了抑病土壤(DSS)。土壤病害抑制是指即使土壤中存在寄主植物和接种体,土传病害的发病率仍会降低。病害抑制能力主要归因于土壤中存在的多种微生物群落,它们可以通过多种方式对抗土传病原体。有益微生物发挥一些特定功能,如抗生作用、寄生作用、资源竞争和捕食作用。然而,越来越多的证据表明土壤非生物因素在很大程度上影响病害抑制作用。病害三角中土壤、植物和环境成分之间复杂的相互作用使得这个过程既复杂又关键,值得深入研究以降低病害发生率。病原体对现有化学物质的抗性不断增强,导致研究重点从可培养微生物转向未探索和不可培养的微生物。耕作、施肥、施用粪肥、灌溉和改良剂等农业管理措施会显著改变土壤理化环境,并影响拮抗菌的生长和行为。植物因素,如植物年龄、作物类型和植物根系行为,可能会刺激或限制根际土壤微生物的多样性和结构。此外,识别和深入研究抑病土壤可能会发现更多具有新型抗菌和促进植物生长特性的有益微生物。迄今为止,已经分离出几种微生物物种,并认为它们是病害抑制的关键贡献者,但对于大多数抑病土壤来说,微生物与非生物相互作用的复杂性和机制仍然难以捉摸。因此,本综述批判性地探讨了土壤中的病害抑制特性、涉及的机制以及影响抑病土壤的生物和非生物因素,并简要回顾了土壤微生物组与抗菌药物的关系,实际上,这是抑病土壤现象的一个结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/f20cc8f3f686/42729_2021_451_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/42f02d7ffaa4/42729_2021_451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/e42316f1d275/42729_2021_451_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/33eab403b3f9/42729_2021_451_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/e06a7d309460/42729_2021_451_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/eaceaeb96dc7/42729_2021_451_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/fb629e3f3ef1/42729_2021_451_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/f20cc8f3f686/42729_2021_451_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/42f02d7ffaa4/42729_2021_451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/e42316f1d275/42729_2021_451_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/33eab403b3f9/42729_2021_451_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/e06a7d309460/42729_2021_451_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/eaceaeb96dc7/42729_2021_451_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/fb629e3f3ef1/42729_2021_451_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f77/7953945/f20cc8f3f686/42729_2021_451_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Disease-Suppressive Soils-Beyond Food Production: a Critical Review.抑病土壤——超越粮食生产:批判性综述
J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21(2):1437-1465. doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00451-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Root-Associated Antagonistic Pseudomonas spp. Contribute to Soil Suppressiveness against Banana Fusarium Wilt Disease of Banana.与根相关的拮抗假单胞菌有助于土壤对香蕉枯萎病的抑制作用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(2):e0352522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03525-22.
3
Current Insights into the Role of Rhizosphere Bacteria in Disease Suppressive Soils.根际细菌在抑病土壤中作用的当前见解
Front Microbiol. 2017 Dec 18;8:2529. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02529. eCollection 2017.
4
Delineating the soil physicochemical and microbiological factors conferring disease suppression in organic farms.阐明有机农场中具有病害抑制作用的土壤物理化学和微生物因素。
Microbiol Res. 2024 Dec;289:127880. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127880. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
5
Plants and Associated Soil Microbiota Cooperatively Suppress Plant-Parasitic Nematodes.植物及其相关土壤微生物群协同抑制植物寄生线虫。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 28;11:313. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00313. eCollection 2020.
6
Pathogen suppression by microbial volatile organic compounds in soils.土壤中微生物挥发性有机化合物对病原体的抑制作用。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Aug 1;95(8). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiz105.
7
Abiotic and Biotic Drivers of Soil Fungal Communities in Response to Dairy Manure Amendment.土壤真菌群落对奶牛粪便改良的非生物和生物驱动因素。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023 Jun 28;89(6):e0193122. doi: 10.1128/aem.01931-22. Epub 2023 May 22.
8
Mechanisms of natural soil suppressiveness to soilborne diseases.天然土壤对土传病害的抑制机制。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):557-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1020557523557.
9
Microbial diversity in soils suppressive to diseases.对病害具有抑制作用的土壤中的微生物多样性。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 4;14:1228749. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1228749. eCollection 2023.
10
Manipulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities to induce suppressive soils.通过调控根际细菌群落诱导形成抑病土壤。
J Nematol. 2007 Sep;39(3):213-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Plant Disease Suppressiveness Enhancement via Soil Health Management.通过土壤健康管理增强植物病害抑制能力
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;14(8):924. doi: 10.3390/biology14080924.
2
Beneficial communities from core bacterial microbiota of Oryza sativa L. soil and leaves perform dynamic role in growth promotion and suppression of bacterial leaf blight.来自水稻土壤和叶片核心细菌微生物群的有益群落对促进生长和抑制白叶枯病发挥着动态作用。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025 Jul 28;41(8):285. doi: 10.1007/s11274-025-04461-0.
3
Native bacteria from a Mediterranean greenhouse associated to soil health and suppressiveness.

本文引用的文献

1
Composted recycled organic matter suppresses soil-borne diseases of field crops.堆肥化的回收有机物质可抑制大田作物的土传病害。
New Phytol. 2002 Jun;154(3):731-740. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00411.x.
2
Evidence for the plant recruitment of beneficial microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens.植物招募有益微生物以抑制土壤传播病原体的证据。
New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(5):2873-2885. doi: 10.1111/nph.17057. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
Blind spots in global soil biodiversity and ecosystem function research.全球土壤生物多样性和生态系统功能研究中的盲点。
来自地中海温室的原生细菌与土壤健康和抑制性相关。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 27;16:1484219. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1484219. eCollection 2025.
4
The Biogeography of Soil Bacteria in Australia Exhibits Greater Resistance to Climate Change Than Fungi.澳大利亚土壤细菌的生物地理学表现出比真菌更强的气候变化抗性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70268. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70268.
5
Plant Genetic Bases Associated With Microbiota Descriptors Shed Light Into a Novel Holobiont Generalist Genes Theory.与微生物群描述符相关的植物遗传基础为一种新的全生物通用基因理论提供了线索。
Environ Microbiol. 2025 May;27(5):e70108. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.70108.
6
The relationship between pomegranate root collar rot and the diversity of fungal communities in its rhizosphere.石榴根颈腐烂病与其根际真菌群落多样性之间的关系。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 21;16:1573724. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1573724. eCollection 2025.
7
Sustainable Management of Major Fungal Phytopathogens in Sorghum ( L.) for Food Security: A Comprehensive Review.高粱主要真菌性植物病原体的可持续管理以保障粮食安全:综述
J Fungi (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;11(3):207. doi: 10.3390/jof11030207.
8
Biocontrol of Agroathelia rolfsii associated with stem rot disease in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and growth promotion using compost-associated actinobacteria.利用与堆肥相关的放线菌对番茄(Solanum lycopersicum L.)茎腐病相关的齐整小核菌进行生物防治及促进生长
Braz J Microbiol. 2025 Jun;56(2):1203-1218. doi: 10.1007/s42770-025-01647-4. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
9
The occurrence of wheat crown rot correlates with the microbial community and function in rhizosphere soil.小麦根腐病的发生与根际土壤中的微生物群落及功能相关。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Feb 11;16:1538093. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1538093. eCollection 2025.
10
The role of the rhizobiome recruited by root exudates in plant disease resistance: current status and future directions.根系分泌物招募的根际微生物群在植物抗病性中的作用:现状与未来方向。
Environ Microbiome. 2024 Nov 16;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40793-024-00638-6.
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 3;11(1):3870. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17688-2.
4
COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention.新冠疫情爆发:移民、对社会的影响、全球环境和预防。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138882. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
5
Bacterial, archaeal and micro-eukaryotic communities characterize a disease-suppressive or conducive soil and a cultivar resistant or susceptible to common scab.细菌、古菌和微真核生物群落可用于表征一种具有抑病或促生特性的土壤,以及一种对普通疮痂病具有抗性或敏感性的品种。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 16;9(1):14883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51570-6.
6
Assessment of Soil Suppressiveness to Aphanomyces Root Rot of Pea.豌豆对腐皮镰孢根腐病土壤抑制性的评估
Plant Dis. 1999 Dec;83(12):1108-1112. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.12.1108.
7
Microbial Communities Associated with Potato Common Scab-Suppressive Soil Determined by Pyrosequencing Analyses.通过焦磷酸测序分析确定的与马铃薯疮痂病抑制性土壤相关的微生物群落
Plant Dis. 2012 May;96(5):718-725. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-11-0571.
8
The occurrence of potato common scab correlates with the community composition and function of the geocaulosphere soil microbiome.马铃薯普通疮痂病的发生与土壤根结线虫区系微生物群落的组成和功能有关。
Microbiome. 2019 Feb 1;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0629-2.
9
Protists: Puppet Masters of the Rhizosphere Microbiome.原生生物:根际微生物组的傀儡大师。
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Feb;24(2):165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.011. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
10
Rifamycin congeners kanglemycins are active against rifampicin-resistant bacteria via a distinct mechanism.利福霉素类似物康莱霉素通过一种独特的机制对耐利福平的细菌具有活性。
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 8;9(1):4147. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06587-2.