Lilaonitkul Watjana, Guinan John J
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009 Sep;10(3):459-70. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0163-1. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Animal studies have led to the view that the acoustic medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent reflex provides sharply tuned frequency-specific feedback that inhibits cochlear amplification. To determine if MOC activation is indeed narrow band, we measured the MOC effects in humans elicited by 60-dB sound pressure level (SPL) contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral noise bands as a function of noise bandwidth from 1/2 to 6.7 octaves. MOC effects were quantified by the change in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions from 40 dB SPL probe tones near 0.5, 1, and 4 kHz. In a second experiment, the noise bands were centered 2 octaves below probe frequencies near 1 and 4 kHz. In all cases, the MOC effects increased as elicitor bandwidth increased, with the effect saturating at about 4 octaves. Generally, the MOC effects increased as the probe frequency decreased, opposite expectations based on MOC innervation density in the cochlea. Bilateral-elicitor effects were always the largest. The ratio of ipsilateral/contralateral effects depended on elicitor bandwidth; the ratio was large for narrow-band probe-centered elicitors and approximately unity for wide-band elicitors. In another experiment, the MOC effects from increasing elicitor bandwidths were calculated from measurements of the MOC effects from adjacent half-octave noise bands. The predicted bandwidth function agreed well with the measured bandwidth function for contralateral elicitors, but overestimated it for ipsilateral and bilateral elicitors. Overall, the results indicate that (1) the MOC reflexes integrate excitation from almost the entire cochlear length, (2) as elicitor bandwidth is increased, the excitation from newly stimulated cochlear regions more than overcomes the reduced excitation at frequencies in the center of the elicitor band, and (3) contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitors show MOC reflex spatial summation over most of the cochlea, but ipsilateral spatial summation is less additive than contralateral.
动物研究得出这样一种观点,即听觉内侧橄榄耳蜗(MOC)传出反射提供了尖锐调谐的频率特异性反馈,可抑制耳蜗放大。为了确定MOC激活是否确实是窄带的,我们测量了由60分贝声压级(SPL)的对侧、同侧和双侧噪声带引起的人类MOC效应,该效应是噪声带宽从1/2到6.7倍频程的函数。MOC效应通过在0.5、1和4千赫附近40分贝声压级探测音的刺激频率耳声发射的变化来量化。在第二个实验中,噪声带以低于1和4千赫附近探测频率2倍频程为中心。在所有情况下,MOC效应随着激发器带宽的增加而增加,在大约4倍频程时效应达到饱和。一般来说,MOC效应随着探测频率的降低而增加,这与基于耳蜗中MOC神经支配密度的预期相反。双侧激发器效应总是最大的。同侧/对侧效应的比率取决于激发器带宽;对于以窄带探测音为中心的激发器,该比率较大,而对于宽带激发器,该比率约为1。在另一个实验中,从相邻半倍频程噪声带的MOC效应测量值计算出增加激发器带宽时的MOC效应。预测的带宽函数与对侧激发器的测量带宽函数吻合良好,但对同侧和双侧激发器则高估了该函数。总体而言,结果表明:(1)MOC反射整合了几乎整个耳蜗长度的兴奋;(2)随着激发器带宽增加,新刺激的耳蜗区域的兴奋超过了激发器带中心频率处兴奋的减少;(3)对侧、同侧和双侧激发器在耳蜗的大部分区域显示出MOC反射空间总和,但同侧空间总和的叠加性比对侧小。