Goodman Shawn S, Keefe Douglas H
Center for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;7(2):125-39. doi: 10.1007/s10162-006-0028-9. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
Otoacoustic emissions serve as a noninvasive probe of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) elicited by a low-level probe tone may be the optimal type of emission for studying MOC effects because at low levels, the probe itself does not elicit the MOC reflex [Guinan et al. (2003) J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:521]. Based on anatomical considerations, the MOC reflex activated by ipsilateral acoustic stimulation (mediated by the crossed olivocochlear bundle) is predicted to be stronger than the reflex to contralateral stimulation. Broadband noise is an effective activator of the MOC reflex; however, it is also an effective activator of the middle-ear muscle (MEM) reflex, which can make results difficult to interpret. The MEM reflex may be activated at lower levels than measured clinically, and most previous human studies have not explicitly included measurements to rule out MEM reflex contamination. The current study addressed these issues using a higher-frequency SFOAE probe tone to test for cochlear changes mediated by the MOC reflex, while simultaneously monitoring the MEM reflex using a low-frequency probe tone. Broadband notched noise was presented ipsilaterally at various levels to elicit probe-tone shifts. Measurements are reported for 15 normal-hearing subjects. With the higher-frequency probe near 1.5 kHz, only 20% of subjects showed shifts consistent with an MOC reflex in the absence of an MEM-induced shift. With the higher-frequency probe near 3.5 kHz, up to 40% of subjects showed shifts in the absence of an MEM-induced shift. However, these responses had longer time courses than expected for MOC-induced shifts, and may have been dominated by other cochlear processes, rather than MOC reflex. These results suggest caution in the interpretation of effects observed using ipsilaterally presented acoustic activators intended to excite the MOC reflex.
耳声发射可作为内侧橄榄耳蜗(MOC)反射的一种非侵入性探测手段。由低强度探测音诱发的刺激频率耳声发射(SFOAE)可能是研究MOC效应的最佳耳声发射类型,因为在低强度时,探测音本身不会诱发MOC反射[吉南等人(2003年)《耳鼻咽喉研究协会杂志》4:521]。基于解剖学考虑,预计由同侧声刺激激活的MOC反射(由交叉橄榄耳蜗束介导)比由对侧刺激引起的反射更强。宽带噪声是MOC反射的有效激活剂;然而,它也是中耳肌肉(MEM)反射的有效激活剂,这可能会使结果难以解释。MEM反射可能在低于临床测量水平时被激活,并且大多数先前的人体研究并未明确纳入排除MEM反射干扰的测量。本研究通过使用更高频率的SFOAE探测音来测试由MOC反射介导的耳蜗变化,同时使用低频探测音监测MEM反射,从而解决了这些问题。在不同强度下向同侧施加宽带陷波噪声以诱发探测音频移。报告了15名听力正常受试者的测量结果。当较高频率的探测音接近1.5kHz时,在没有MEM诱发频移的情况下,只有20%的受试者表现出与MOC反射一致的频移。当较高频率的探测音接近3.5kHz时,在没有MEM诱发频移的情况下,高达40%的受试者表现出频移。然而,这些反应的时间进程比MOC诱发频移预期的要长,并且可能由其他耳蜗过程主导,而非MOC反射。这些结果表明,在解释使用旨在激发MOC反射的同侧声激活剂所观察到的效应时应谨慎。