Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;107(6):1598-611. doi: 10.1152/jn.00549.2011. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
The medial-olivocochlear (MOC) acoustic reflex is thought to provide frequency-specific feedback that adjusts the gain of cochlear amplification, but little is known about how frequency specific the reflex actually is. We measured human MOC tuning through changes in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) from 40-dB-SPL tones at probe frequencies (f(p)s) near 0.5, 1.0, and 4.0 kHz. MOC activity was elicited by 60-dB-SPL ipsilateral, contralateral, or bilateral tones or half-octave noise bands, with elicitor frequency (f(e)) varied in half-octave steps. Tone and noise elicitors produced similar results. At all probe frequencies, SFOAE changes were produced by a wide range of elicitor frequencies with elicitor frequencies near 0.7-2.0 kHz being particularly effective. MOC-induced changes in SFOAE magnitude and SFOAE phase were surprisingly different functions of f(e): magnitude inhibition largest for f(e) close to f(p), phase change largest for f(e) remote from f(p). The metric ΔSFOAE, which combines both magnitude and phase changes, provided the best match to reported (cat) MOC neural inhibition. Ipsilateral and contralateral MOC reflexes often showed dramatic differences in plots of MOC effect vs. elicitor frequency, indicating that the contralateral reflex does not give an accurate picture of ipsilateral-reflex properties. These differences in MOC effects appear to imply that ipsilateral and contralateral reflexes have different actions in the cochlea. The implication of these results for MOC function, cochlear mechanics, and the production of SFOAEs are discussed.
中橄榄耳蜗(MOC)声反射被认为提供了频率特异性反馈,从而调节耳蜗放大的增益,但对于该反射实际上具有多高的频率特异性知之甚少。我们通过在接近 0.5、1.0 和 4.0 kHz 的探测频率(f(p)s)处测量 40-dB-SPL 音调的刺激频率耳声发射(SFOAE)的变化来测量人类 MOC 调谐。MOC 活性由 60-dB-SPL 的同侧、对侧或双侧音调或半倍频带噪声激发,激发器频率(f(e)) 以半倍频程步长变化。音调和声激发产生了相似的结果。在所有探测频率下,SFOAE 的变化都由激发器频率的宽范围产生,其中激发器频率在 0.7-2.0 kHz 附近特别有效。MOC 诱导的 SFOAE 幅度和 SFOAE 相位变化与 f(e)的关系令人惊讶地不同:幅度抑制对 f(e)接近 f(p)的情况最大,相位变化对 f(e)远离 f(p)的情况最大。将幅度和相位变化结合起来的度量ΔSFOAE 与报道的(猫)MOC 神经抑制最吻合。同侧和对侧 MOC 反射在 MOC 效应与激发器频率的关系图上经常显示出明显的差异,表明对侧反射不能准确反映同侧反射的特性。这些 MOC 效应的差异似乎意味着同侧和对侧反射在耳蜗中具有不同的作用。这些结果对 MOC 功能、耳蜗力学和 SFOAE 的产生的影响进行了讨论。