• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Can the Canadian Heart Health Initiative inform the population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada?加拿大心脏健康倡议能否为加拿大全民健康干预研究倡议提供信息?
Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I20-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405505.
2
The imperative of strategic alignment across organizations: the experience of the Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation.跨组织战略协调的必要性:加拿大癌症协会行为研究与项目评估中心的经验
Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I27-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03405506.
3
Alliance members' roles in collective field-building: an assessment of leadership and championship within the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada.联盟成员在集体领域建设中的作用:对加拿大人口健康干预研究倡议中的领导力和冠军的评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Dec 6;15(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0265-x.
4
Commentary on population health intervention research.人口健康干预研究述评
Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I31-2. doi: 10.1007/BF03405507.
5
Canadian Institutes of Health Research support for population health intervention research in Canada.加拿大卫生研究院对加拿大人群健康干预研究的支持。
Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I15-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03405504.
6
Dissemination of heart health promotion: lessons from the Canadian Heart Health Initiative Ontario Project.心脏健康促进的传播:来自加拿大心脏健康倡议安大略项目的经验教训。
Promot Educ. 2001;Suppl 1:26-30.
7
Healthy Canada by Design CLASP: Lessons learned from the first phase of an intersectoral, cross-provincial, built environment initiative.加拿大健康设计CLASP:从一个跨部门、跨省的建筑环境倡议第一阶段汲取的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Sep 12;106(1 Suppl 1):eS50-63. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4555.
8
What is population health intervention research?什么是人群健康干预研究?
Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I8-14. doi: 10.1007/BF03405503.
9
Building capacity for heart health promotion: results of a 5-year experience in Nova Scotia, Canada.提升心脏健康促进能力:加拿大新斯科舍省5年经验的成果
Am J Health Promot. 2003 Jan-Feb;17(3):202-12. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-17.3.202.
10
Using linking systems to build capacity and enhance dissemination in heart health promotion: a Canadian multiple-case study.利用链接系统建设能力并加强心脏健康促进中的传播:一项加拿大的多案例研究。
Health Educ Res. 2005 Oct;20(5):499-513. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh006. Epub 2004 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing and strengthening the study of social networks in community-level dissemination and implementation research: A narrative review.推进和加强社区层面传播与实施研究中的社会网络研究:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 28;8(1):e203. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.614. eCollection 2024.
2
Community engagement in dissemination and implementation models: A narrative review.社区参与传播与实施模式:一项叙述性综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 1;2:2633489520985305. doi: 10.1177/2633489520985305. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
An Analysis of the Structural Factors Affecting the Public Participation in Health Promotion.影响公众参与健康促进的结构因素分析
Glob J Health Sci. 2016 Aug 1;8(8):53129. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p94.
4
Creating a collective impact on childhood obesity: Lessons from the SCOPE initiative.对儿童肥胖问题产生集体影响:来自SCOPE倡议的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2015 Oct 3;106(6):e426-33. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.5114.
5
Networks to strengthen health systems for chronic disease prevention.加强慢性病预防的卫生系统网络。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):e39-48. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301249. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
6
"The magic is in the mix": lessons from research capacity building in the Canadian tobacco control community, 2000-2010.“魔力在于融合”:加拿大烟草控制社区 2000-2010 年研究能力建设的经验教训。
Can J Public Health. 2013 Feb 25;104(2):e173-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405684.
7
Frequently asked questions about population health intervention research. 关于人群健康干预研究的常见问题解答。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Nov 6;103(6):e468-71. doi: 10.1007/BF03405640.
8
Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.弥合研究与实践之间的差距:传播和实施研究的模式。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):337-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024.
9
Addressing poor nutrition to promote heart health: moving upstream.解决营养不良问题以促进心脏健康:从源头入手。
Can J Cardiol. 2010 Aug-Sep;26 Suppl C(Suppl C):21C-4C. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)71078-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptualizing dissemination research and activity: the case of the Canadian Heart Health Initiative.概念化传播研究与活动:以加拿大心脏健康倡议为例。
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Jun;30(3):267-82; discussion 283-6. doi: 10.1177/1090198103030003003.
2
Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research.为定性健康研究制定并实施一种三角测量方案。
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):377-94. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285708.
3
Development of measures of individual leadership for health promotion.促进健康的个人领导力衡量指标的制定。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(2-3):i-xii. doi: 10.1108/13660750510594846.
4
Evidence-based health promotion practice: how to make it work.循证健康促进实践:如何使其发挥作用。
Promot Educ. 2005;Suppl 1:15-20, 46, 56-7 passim. doi: 10.1177/10253823050120010106x.
5
Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?自然实验:公共卫生领域未得到充分利用的工具?
Public Health. 2005 Sep;119(9):751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.11.008.
6
Fostering evidence-based decision-making in Canada: examining the need for a Canadian population and public health evidence centre and research network.在加拿大促进基于证据的决策:审视建立加拿大人口与公共卫生证据中心及研究网络的必要性。
Can J Public Health. 2005 May-Jun;96(3):I1-40 following 200.
7
A conceptual model of community capacity development for health promotion in the Alberta Heart Health Project.阿尔伯塔心脏健康项目中促进健康的社区能力发展概念模型。
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Jan;6(1):31-6. doi: 10.1177/1524839903259302.
8
Towards the development of scales to measure 'will' to promote heart health within health organizations in Canada.致力于开发量表,以衡量加拿大卫生组织内部促进心脏健康的“意愿”。
Health Promot Int. 2004 Dec;19(4):471-81. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah409. Epub 2004 Nov 1.
9
Systemic capacity building: a hierarchy of needs.系统性能力建设:需求层次
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Sep;19(5):336-45. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh038.
10
Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems.增进健康的知识:健康研究系统的概念框架与基础
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(11):815-20. Epub 2004 Jan 20.

加拿大心脏健康倡议能否为加拿大全民健康干预研究倡议提供信息?

Can the Canadian Heart Health Initiative inform the population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada?

作者信息

Riley Barbara L, Stachenko Sylvie, Wilson Elinor, Harvey Dexter, Cameron Roy, Farquharson Jane, Donovan Catherine, Taylor Gregory

机构信息

Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, University of Waterloo, Lyle S. Hallman Institute North, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):Suppl I20-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405505.

DOI:10.1007/BF03405505
PMID:19263979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6973562/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is to build capacity to increase the quantity, quality and use of population health intervention research. But what capacity is required, and how should capacity be created? There may be relevant lessons from the Canadian Heart Health Initiative (CHHI), a 20-year initiative (1986-2006) that was groundbreaking in its attempt to bring together researchers and public health leaders (from government and non-government organizations) to jointly plan, conduct and act on relevant evidence. The present study focused on what enabled and constrained the ability to fund, conduct and use science in the CHHI.

METHODS

Guided by a provisional capacity-building framework, a two-step methodology was used: a CHHI document analysis followed by consultation with CHHI leaders to refine and confirm emerging findings.

RESULTS

A few well-positioned, visionary people conceived of the CHHI as a long-term, coherent initiative that would have impact, and they then created an environment to enable this to become reality. To achieve the vision, capacity was needed to a) align science (research and evaluation) with public health policy and program priorities, including the capacity to study "natural experiments" and b) build meaningful partnerships within and across sectors.

CONCLUSION

There is now an opportunity to apply lessons from the CHHI in planning PHIRIC.

摘要

目标

加拿大人口健康干预研究倡议(PHIRIC)的目的是增强能力,以增加人口健康干预研究的数量、质量和应用。但需要何种能力,以及应如何培养这种能力?加拿大心脏健康倡议(CHHI,1986 - 2006年,为期20年)或许能提供相关经验教训,该倡议在试图将研究人员与公共卫生领域领导者(来自政府和非政府组织)汇聚一堂,共同规划、开展相关研究并依据证据采取行动方面具有开创性意义。本研究聚焦于在CHHI中,资助、开展和应用科学的能力受到哪些促进因素和制约因素的影响。

方法

在一个临时的能力建设框架指导下,采用了两步法:首先对CHHI的文件进行分析,随后与CHHI的领导者进行磋商,以完善并确认新出现的研究结果。

结果

一些处于有利位置且富有远见的人将CHHI构想为一项具有影响力的长期连贯倡议,随后他们营造了一种环境,使这一构想得以实现。为达成这一愿景,需要具备以下能力:a)使科学(研究与评估)与公共卫生政策及项目重点保持一致,包括研究“自然实验”的能力;b)在部门内部及部门之间建立有意义的伙伴关系。

结论

现在有机会在规划PHIRIC时应用CHHI的经验教训。