Lavery Matthew D, Aulakh Arshbir, Christian Michael D
Southern Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Rural Coordination Centre of BC (RCCbc), 1665 W Broadway Suite 620, Vancouver, BC, V6J 1X1, Canada.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 6;33(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01298-8.
Over the past three decades, more advanced pre-hospital systems have increasingly integrated physicians into targeted roles, forming interprofessional teams. These teams focus on providing early senior decision-making and advanced interventions while also ensuring rapid transport to hospitals based on individual patient needs. This paper aims to evaluate the benefits of an inter-professional care model compared to a model where care is delivered solely by paramedics.
A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted using the guidelines of PRISMA 2020. Articles were identified through a systematic search of three databases and snowballing references. A systematic review was conducted of articles that met the inclusion criteria, and a suitable subset was included in a meta-analysis. The survival and mortality outcomes from the studies were then pooled using the statistical software Review Manager (RevMan) Version 8.2.0.
Two thousand two hundred ninety-six articles were found from the online databases and 86 from other sources. However, only 23 articles met the inclusion criteria of our study. A pooled analysis of the outcomes reported in these studies indicated that the mortality risk was significantly reduced in patients who received pre-hospital care from interprofessional teams led by physicians compared with those who received care from paramedics alone (AOR 0.80; 95% CI [0.68, 0.91] p = 0.001). The survival rate of critically ill or injured patients who received pre-hospital care from interprofessional teams led by physicians was increased compared to those who received care from paramedics alone (AOR 1.49; 95% CI [1.31, 1.69] P < 0.00001).
The results of our analysis indicate that the targeted deployment of interprofessional teams led by physicians in the pre-hospital care of critically ill or injured patients improves patient outcomes.
在过去三十年中,更先进的院前系统越来越多地将医生纳入特定角色,形成跨专业团队。这些团队专注于提供早期高级决策和高级干预措施,同时还根据患者个体需求确保快速转运至医院。本文旨在评估跨专业护理模式与仅由护理人员提供护理的模式相比的益处。
按照PRISMA 2020指南进行荟萃分析和系统评价。通过对三个数据库进行系统检索和滚雪球式参考文献检索来识别文章。对符合纳入标准的文章进行系统评价,并将合适的子集纳入荟萃分析。然后使用统计软件Review Manager(RevMan)8.2.0汇总研究中的生存和死亡结果。
从在线数据库中找到2296篇文章,从其他来源找到86篇文章。然而,只有23篇文章符合我们研究的纳入标准。对这些研究中报告的结果进行汇总分析表明,与仅接受护理人员护理的患者相比,接受由医生领导的跨专业团队院前护理的患者死亡风险显著降低(比值比0.80;95%置信区间[0.68, 0.91],p = 0.001)。与仅接受护理人员护理的患者相比,接受由医生领导的跨专业团队院前护理的重症或受伤患者的生存率有所提高(比值比1.49;95%置信区间[1.31, 1.69],P < 0.00001)。
我们的分析结果表明,在重症或受伤患者的院前护理中,有针对性地部署由医生领导的跨专业团队可改善患者结局。