Suppr超能文献

患者-呼吸机不同步性及其与镇静水平关系的观察性研究。

Observational study of patient-ventilator asynchrony and relationship to sedation level.

作者信息

de Wit Marjolein, Pedram Sammy, Best Al M, Epstein Scott K

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980050, Richmond, VA 23298-0050, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2009 Mar;24(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.08.011. Epub 2009 Jan 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Clinicians frequently administer sedation to facilitate mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between sedation level and patient-ventilator asynchrony.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Airway pressure and airflow were recorded for 15 minutes. Patient-ventilator asynchrony was assessed by determining the number of breaths demonstrating ineffective triggering, double triggering, short cycling, and prolonged cycling. Ineffective triggering index (ITI) was calculated by dividing the number of ineffectively triggered breaths by the total number of breaths (triggered and ineffectively triggered). Sedation level was assessed by the following 3 methods: Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), awake (yes or no), and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit [CAM-ICU]).

RESULTS

Twenty medical ICU patients underwent 35 observations. Ineffective triggering was seen in 17 of 20 patients and was the most frequent asynchrony (88% of all asynchronous breaths), being observed in 9% +/- 12% of breaths. Deeper levels of sedation were associated with increasing ITI (awake, yes 2% vs no 11%; P < .05; CAM-ICU, coma [15%] vs delirium [5%] vs no delirium [2%]; P < .05; RASS, 0, 0% vs -5, 15%; P < .05). Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sedative type or dose, mechanical ventilation mode, and trigger method had no effect on ITI.

CONCLUSIONS

Asynchrony is common, and deeper sedation level is a predictor of ineffective triggering.

摘要

目的

临床医生经常给予镇静剂以辅助机械通气。本研究的目的是探讨镇静水平与患者 - 呼吸机不同步之间的关系。

材料与方法

记录气道压力和气流15分钟。通过确定表现出无效触发、双重触发、短周期和长周期的呼吸次数来评估患者 - 呼吸机不同步情况。无效触发指数(ITI)通过将无效触发呼吸次数除以总呼吸次数(触发和无效触发)来计算。通过以下三种方法评估镇静水平:里士满躁动 - 镇静量表(RASS)、清醒(是或否)以及谵妄(重症监护病房谵妄评估方法[CAM - ICU])。

结果

20名医学重症监护病房患者接受了35次观察。20名患者中有17名出现无效触发,且是最常见的不同步情况(占所有不同步呼吸的88%),在9%±12%的呼吸中观察到。更深的镇静水平与ITI增加相关(清醒,是2%对否11%;P <.05;CAM - ICU,昏迷[15%]对谵妄[5%]对无谵妄[2%];P <.05;RASS,0,0%对 - 5,15%;P <.05)。慢性阻塞性肺疾病的诊断、镇静剂类型或剂量、机械通气模式和触发方法对ITI无影响。

结论

不同步情况常见,且更深的镇静水平是无效触发的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Observational study of patient-ventilator asynchrony and relationship to sedation level.
J Crit Care. 2009 Mar;24(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.08.011. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
2
Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation.
Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2740-5. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a98a05.
3
Patient-ventilator asynchrony in a traumatically injured population.
Respir Care. 2013 Nov;58(11):1847-55. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02237. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
5
Patient-ventilator asynchrony.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Feb;22(1):53-9. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000270.
6
Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation.
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1515-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
7
Patient-ventilator asynchronies: may the respiratory mechanics play a role?
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 25;17(2):R54. doi: 10.1186/cc12580.

引用本文的文献

2
Let's get in sync: current standing and future of AI-based detection of patient-ventilator asynchrony.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Mar 21;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00746-8.
6
Monitoring and modulation of respiratory drive in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in spontaneous breathing.
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;19(8):2105-2119. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03715-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
7
Reverse triggering ? a novel or previously missed phenomenon?
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 May 22;14(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01303-4.
8
Survey of Ventilator Waveform Interpretation Among ICU Professionals.
Respir Care. 2024 Jun 28;69(7):773-781. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11677.
9
Automated evaluation of typical patient-ventilator asynchronies based on lung hysteretic responses.
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Oct 24;22(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01165-0.
10
Fundamental concepts and the latest evidence for esophageal pressure monitoring.
J Intensive Care. 2023 May 22;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00671-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation.
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1515-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
3
Optimizing patient-ventilator synchrony.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;22(2):137-52. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13828.
5
The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
7
Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005183422002.
8
Physiologic determinants of ventilator dependence in long-term mechanically ventilated patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Apr;161(4 Pt 1):1115-23. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.4.9812160.
9
Patient-ventilator trigger asynchrony in prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Chest. 1997 Dec;112(6):1592-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.6.1592.
10
Comparison of assisted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort, and dyspnea.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Jun;155(6):1940-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196100.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验