de Wit Marjolein, Pedram Sammy, Best Al M, Epstein Scott K
Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980050, Richmond, VA 23298-0050, USA.
J Crit Care. 2009 Mar;24(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.08.011. Epub 2009 Jan 17.
Clinicians frequently administer sedation to facilitate mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between sedation level and patient-ventilator asynchrony.
Airway pressure and airflow were recorded for 15 minutes. Patient-ventilator asynchrony was assessed by determining the number of breaths demonstrating ineffective triggering, double triggering, short cycling, and prolonged cycling. Ineffective triggering index (ITI) was calculated by dividing the number of ineffectively triggered breaths by the total number of breaths (triggered and ineffectively triggered). Sedation level was assessed by the following 3 methods: Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), awake (yes or no), and delirium (Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit [CAM-ICU]).
Twenty medical ICU patients underwent 35 observations. Ineffective triggering was seen in 17 of 20 patients and was the most frequent asynchrony (88% of all asynchronous breaths), being observed in 9% +/- 12% of breaths. Deeper levels of sedation were associated with increasing ITI (awake, yes 2% vs no 11%; P < .05; CAM-ICU, coma [15%] vs delirium [5%] vs no delirium [2%]; P < .05; RASS, 0, 0% vs -5, 15%; P < .05). Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sedative type or dose, mechanical ventilation mode, and trigger method had no effect on ITI.
Asynchrony is common, and deeper sedation level is a predictor of ineffective triggering.
临床医生经常给予镇静剂以辅助机械通气。本研究的目的是探讨镇静水平与患者 - 呼吸机不同步之间的关系。
记录气道压力和气流15分钟。通过确定表现出无效触发、双重触发、短周期和长周期的呼吸次数来评估患者 - 呼吸机不同步情况。无效触发指数(ITI)通过将无效触发呼吸次数除以总呼吸次数(触发和无效触发)来计算。通过以下三种方法评估镇静水平:里士满躁动 - 镇静量表(RASS)、清醒(是或否)以及谵妄(重症监护病房谵妄评估方法[CAM - ICU])。
20名医学重症监护病房患者接受了35次观察。20名患者中有17名出现无效触发,且是最常见的不同步情况(占所有不同步呼吸的88%),在9%±12%的呼吸中观察到。更深的镇静水平与ITI增加相关(清醒,是2%对否11%;P <.05;CAM - ICU,昏迷[15%]对谵妄[5%]对无谵妄[2%];P <.05;RASS,0,0%对 - 5,15%;P <.05)。慢性阻塞性肺疾病的诊断、镇静剂类型或剂量、机械通气模式和触发方法对ITI无影响。
不同步情况常见,且更深的镇静水平是无效触发的预测因素。