O'Riordan David L, Nehl Eric, Gies Peter, Bundy Lucja, Burgess Kristen, Davis Erica, Glanz Karen
Australian Sun and Health Research Laboratory, School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Road, Kelvin Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 May;60(5):739-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
Few studies have reported the accuracy of measures used to assess sun-protection practices. Valid measures are critical to the internal validity and use of skin cancer control research.
We sought to validate self-reported covering-up practices of pool-goers.
A total of 162 lifeguards and 201 parent/child pairs from 16 pools in 4 metropolitan regions in the United States completed a survey and a 4-day sun-habits diary. Observations of sun-protective behaviors were conducted on two occasions.
Agreement between observations and diaries ranged from slight to substantial, with most values in the fair to moderate range. Highest agreement was observed for parent hat use (kappa = 0.58-0.70). There was no systematic pattern of over- or under-reporting among the 3 study groups.
Potential reactivity and a relatively affluent sample are limitations.
There was little over-reporting and no systematic bias, which increases confidence in reliance on verbal reports of these behaviors in surveys and intervention research.
很少有研究报告用于评估防晒措施的方法的准确性。有效的方法对于皮肤癌控制研究的内部有效性和应用至关重要。
我们试图验证泳池使用者自我报告的遮盖行为。
来自美国4个大都市地区16个泳池的162名救生员和201对亲子完成了一项调查和一份为期4天的防晒习惯日记。对防晒行为进行了两次观察。
观察结果与日记之间的一致性从轻微到显著不等,大多数值处于中等偏下范围。观察到父母使用帽子的一致性最高(kappa = 0.58 - 0.70)。3个研究组中没有系统的高估或低估模式。
潜在的反应性和样本相对富裕是局限性。
很少有高估情况且没有系统偏差,这增加了在调查和干预研究中依赖这些行为的口头报告的信心。