• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产的全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉:对住院时间的影响。

General versus neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section: impact on the duration of hospital stay.

作者信息

Fassoulaki A, Petropoulos G, Staikou C, Siafaka I, Sarantopoulos C

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Aretaieio Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jan;29(1):25-30. doi: 10.1080/01443610802628569.

DOI:10.1080/01443610802628569
PMID:19280491
Abstract

We investigated retrospectively the duration of hospital stay of 1,619 women who received general (GA) (n = 582) or neuraxial anaesthesia (combined spinal-epidural [CSEA] (n = 614), epidural [EA] (n = 423)) for caesarean delivery over the years 2002-2005. Hospital stay was also analysed for the different obstetricians involved. Overall duration of hospital stay differed between 2002 and 2005 (p < 0.0001) but not between CSEA and EA (p = 0.460). Overall duration of hospital stay differed between neuraxial and GA group (p < 0.001). Duration of hospital stay of the GA group showed a progressive decrease between 2002 and 2005 (p = 0.002). Duration of hospital stay after neuraxial anaesthesia differed between 2002 and 2005 (p = 0.013) and among different surgeons (p < 0.001). Discharge rates from the hospital were shorter after neuraxial anaesthesia versus GA for the 3rd and 4th postoperative days (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section seems to be associated with shorter duration of hospital stay than GA.

摘要

我们回顾性研究了2002年至2005年期间接受全身麻醉(GA)(n = 582)或神经轴索麻醉(腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉[CSEA](n = 614)、硬膜外麻醉[EA](n = 423))进行剖宫产的1619名女性的住院时间。还对不同产科医生的情况进行了住院时间分析。2002年和2005年的总体住院时间存在差异(p < 0.0001),但CSEA和EA之间无差异(p = 0.460)。神经轴索麻醉组和GA组的总体住院时间存在差异(p < 0.001)。GA组的住院时间在2002年至2005年期间呈逐渐下降趋势(p = 0.002)。神经轴索麻醉后的住院时间在2002年和2005年之间存在差异(p = 0.013),且在不同外科医生之间也存在差异(p < 0.001)。术后第3天和第4天,神经轴索麻醉后的出院时间比GA短(分别为p < 0.001和p < 0.001)。剖宫产的神经轴索麻醉似乎比GA与更短的住院时间相关。

相似文献

1
General versus neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section: impact on the duration of hospital stay.剖宫产的全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉:对住院时间的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jan;29(1):25-30. doi: 10.1080/01443610802628569.
2
Anaesthesia preference, neuraxial vs general, and outcome after caesarean section.剖宫产的麻醉方式选择,腰麻与全麻对比及术后结局
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(8):818-21. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.518650.
3
Thoracic epidural anaesthesia for open cholecystectomy.开腹胆囊切除术的胸段硬膜外麻醉
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011 Nov;21(11):654-8.
4
Caesarean section outcome in eclamptic patients: a comparison of infiltration and general anaesthesia.子痫患者剖宫产的结局:局部浸润麻醉与全身麻醉的比较
West Afr J Med. 2008 Oct;27(4):250-4.
5
Does neuraxial anesthesia reduce intraoperative blood loss? A meta-analysis.椎管内麻醉能减少术中失血吗?一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Sep;18(6):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.006.
6
A survey of obstetric an aesthesia practice in Flanders.佛兰德地区产科麻醉实践调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57(1):29-37.
7
An observational study of anaesthesia and surgical time in elective caesarean section: spinal compared with general anaesthesia.择期剖宫产麻醉与手术时间的观察性研究:脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的比较
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Oct;18(4):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
8
Obstetric anaesthesia outcome in obese and non-obese parturients undergoing caesarean delivery: an observational study.肥胖与非肥胖产妇剖宫产的产科麻醉结局:一项观察性研究
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Jul;18(3):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.07.013. Epub 2009 May 17.
9
Perinatal outcome of emergency cesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a seven-year retrospective analysis.椎管内麻醉与全身麻醉下行急诊剖宫产术的围生期结局:一项七年回顾性分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jan 19;24(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02412-0.
10
Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries.产科椎管内镇痛与麻醉失败的发生率及特征:对19259例分娩的回顾性分析
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004 Oct;13(4):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.04.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Xyla-P Cream vs. Lidocaine Spray: Impact on Patient Satisfaction, Anxiety, Cooperation, and Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.木糖-P乳膏与利多卡因喷雾剂:对剖宫产脊髓麻醉中患者满意度、焦虑、合作程度及疼痛的影响
Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 12;14(6):e157126. doi: 10.5812/aapm-157126. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Determinants of length of stay after cesarean sections in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.2005-2015 年意大利东北部弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区剖宫产术后住院时间的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 6;10(1):19238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74161-2.
3
Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Due to General Anesthesia and Neuraxial Anesthesia in Lower-Limb Fracture Patients: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.
下肢骨折患者全身麻醉和脊麻与心血管疾病风险:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):33. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010033.
4
The Analgesic Efficacy of Transverse Abdominis Plane Block versus Epidural Block after Caesarean Delivery: Which One Is Effective? TAP Block? Epidural Block?剖宫产术后腹横肌平面阻滞与硬膜外阻滞的镇痛效果:哪种更有效?腹横肌平面阻滞?硬膜外阻滞?
Pain Res Manag. 2018 Oct 17;2018:3562701. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562701. eCollection 2018.
5
Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Thoracic Epidural Anaesthesia: Retrospective Analysis of 96 Patients.胸段硬膜外麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经验:96例患者的回顾性分析
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Feb;43(1):29-34. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.68926. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
6
Impact of Anesthetic Predictors on Postpartum Hospital Length of Stay and Adverse Events Following Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study in 840 Consecutive Parturients.麻醉预测因素对剖宫产术后住院时间及不良事件的影响:对840例连续产妇的回顾性研究
Ochsner J. 2015 Fall;15(3):228-36.
7
Maternal and fetal outcomes following unplanned conversion to general anesthetic at elective cesarean section.择期剖宫产术中意外转为全身麻醉后的母婴结局
J Perinatol. 2015 Sep;35(9):695-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.62. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
8
Fetomaternal outcome in severe preeclamptic women undergoing emergency cesarean section under either general or spinal anesthesia.在全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉下接受急诊剖宫产的重度子痫前期妇女的母儿结局。
J Pregnancy. 2014;2014:325098. doi: 10.1155/2014/325098. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
9
General anaesthesia is associated with increased risk of surgical site infection after Caesarean delivery compared with neuraxial anaesthesia: a population-based study.全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉相比,增加了剖宫产术后手术部位感染的风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):757-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer262. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
10
Subarachnoid block for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia.重度子痫前期剖宫产蛛网膜下腔阻滞
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;27(2):169-73. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.81821.