Schneider Marilyn J, Mastovska Katerina, Lehotay Steven J, Lightfield Alan R, Kinsella Brian, Shultz Craig E
USDA-ARS, Eastern Regional Research Center, 600 E. Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, PA 19038 USA.
Anal Chim Acta. 2009 Apr 1;637(1-2):290-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
Rapid screening tests can be used as part of an efficient program designed to monitor veterinary drug residues in cattle. In this work, three rapid tests designed to screen samples for the presence of antibiotic residues, the Fast Antimicrobial Screen Test (FAST), Premi and Kidney Inhibition Swab (KIS) tests, were compared using beef kidney juice and serum samples. In order to provide a realistic assessment, potentially incurred samples of beef kidney juice and serum were obtained from 235 carcasses which had been retained by inspectors in a processing plant for further testing. In addition, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis was conducted on these samples to identify what antibiotics were present, if any, and their levels. The comparison of the three rapid screening test results with those from LC-MS/MS analysis allowed for a more complete comparison of the relative sensitivity of these analytical methods, as well as valuable information on false positive and negative response rates.
快速筛查测试可作为旨在监测牛体内兽药残留的高效计划的一部分。在这项工作中,使用牛肉肾汁和血清样本对三种旨在筛查样本中抗生素残留的快速测试——快速抗菌筛查测试(FAST)、普瑞米测试和肾抑制拭子(KIS)测试进行了比较。为了进行实际评估,从一家加工厂的检查员留存以待进一步检测的235具牛胴体中获取了可能含有抗生素的牛肉肾汁和血清样本。此外,对这些样本进行了液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)分析,以确定是否存在抗生素及其含量。将三种快速筛查测试结果与LC-MS/MS分析结果进行比较,能够更全面地比较这些分析方法的相对灵敏度,以及获得有关假阳性和假阴性反应率的宝贵信息。