• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[科学领域的评估过程以及卡洛斯·恰加斯被提名为诺贝尔生理学或医学奖候选人]

[The assessment process within science and the nomination of Carlos Chagas for the Nobel prize for Physiology or Medicine].

作者信息

Pittella José Eymard Homem

机构信息

Departamento de Anatomia Patológica e Medicina Legal, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG.

出版信息

Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):67-72. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822009000100014.

DOI:10.1590/s0037-86822009000100014
PMID:19287939
Abstract

One of the greatest achievements in the history of medicine was the description of Chagas disease by the physician and scientist Carlos Chagas. A hundred years after the discovery of the disease, speculation still remains regarding the two official nominations of Carlos Chagas for the Nobel Prize, the biggest worldwide scientific award, in 1913 and in 1921. It has been accepted that the reason why the prize was not awarded to this brilliant scientist may have been the strong opposition that he faced in Brazil, from some physicians and researchers of that time. They went as far as questioning the existence of Chagas disease, thereby possibly influencing the decision of the Nobel Committee not to award the prize to him. Analysis of the database of the Nobel prize archives, with the revelation of the names of nominators, nominees and prizewinners spanning the years 1901-1951, brought information not only about what was considered to be a scientific achievement at that time, but also about who the important scientists were and what the relationships between them were. The non-recognition of Carlos Chagas' discoveries by the Nobel Committee appears to be more correctly explained by these factors than by the negative impact of the local opposition.

摘要

医学史上最伟大的成就之一是医生兼科学家卡洛斯·查加斯对恰加斯病的描述。在该疾病被发现一百年后,关于卡洛斯·查加斯在1913年和1921年两次获得全球最大科学奖项——诺贝尔奖的官方提名,猜测仍然存在。人们普遍认为,这位杰出科学家未能获奖的原因可能是他在巴西遭到了当时一些医生和研究人员的强烈反对。他们甚至质疑恰加斯病的存在,从而可能影响了诺贝尔委员会不授予他该奖项的决定。对诺贝尔奖档案数据库的分析,揭示了1901年至1951年间提名者、被提名者和获奖者的名字,这不仅带来了当时被视为科学成就的信息,还让人们了解到重要科学家是谁以及他们之间的关系。诺贝尔委员会未认可卡洛斯·查加斯的发现,用这些因素来解释似乎比当地反对意见的负面影响更为合理。

相似文献

1
[The assessment process within science and the nomination of Carlos Chagas for the Nobel prize for Physiology or Medicine].[科学领域的评估过程以及卡洛斯·恰加斯被提名为诺贝尔生理学或医学奖候选人]
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):67-72. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822009000100014.
2
Justice where justice is due: A posthumous Nobel Prize to Carlos Chagas (1879-1934), the discoverer of American Trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease).应得的正义:追授发现美洲锥虫病(恰加斯病)的卡洛斯·恰加斯(1879 - 1934)诺贝尔奖
Int J Cardiol. 2009 May 1;134(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.12.197. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
3
When a misperception favors a tragedy: Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize of 1921.当误解促成悲剧:卡洛斯·查加斯与 1921 年的诺贝尔奖。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 20;169(5):327-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.137. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
4
The noble enigma: Chagas' nominations for the Nobel prize.崇高的谜团:恰加斯病被提名诺贝尔奖的情况。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94 Suppl 1:123-9. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761999000700012.
5
Dissecting slander and crying for justice: Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize of 1921.剖析诽谤与伸张正义:卡洛斯·恰加斯与1921年诺贝尔奖
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.048. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Prophet in his own country: Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize.本国的先知:卡洛斯·查加斯与诺贝尔奖
Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Fall;46(4):532-49. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0078.
7
Otorhinolaryngologists nominated for the Nobel Prize 1901-1940.1901-1940 年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖提名的耳鼻喉科医生。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Apr;277(4):1255-1258. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05833-y. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
8
Did death hinder the process of justice? Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize of 1935.死亡阻碍司法进程了吗?卡洛斯·恰加斯与1935年诺贝尔奖。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Feb 17;147(1):172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.020. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
9
The "Nobel Population" in Pharmacology: Nobel Prize laureates, nominees and nominators 1901-1953 with a focus on B. Naunyn and O. Schmiedeberg.药理学领域的“诺贝尔群体”:1901年至1953年的诺贝尔奖获得者、被提名者及提名者,重点关注B. 瑙尼恩和O. 施米德贝格。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;393(7):1173-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00210-019-01807-y. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
10
On the occasion of the centennial of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, 1923: Nicolae C. Paulescu-between scientific creativity and political fanatism.在诺贝尔生理学或医学奖设立一百周年之际,1923 年:尼古拉·C·帕雷尔斯库——在科学创造力和政治狂热之间。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Nov;60(11):1513-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02136-6. Epub 2023 Jul 5.