Edens John F
Texas A&M University, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2009 Mar;21(1):89-98. doi: 10.1037/a0014856.
Interest in conceptualizing the interpersonal style of individuals who engage in serious antisocial behavior has increased in recent years. This study examines the personality, psychopathological, and behavioral correlates of interpersonal dominance and warmth, as operationalized via scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory (L. Morey, 2007), across several samples of male prison inmates (combined N = 1,062). Consistent with theory, multivariate analyses indicated that low warmth and, to a lesser extent, high dominance were associated with antisocial and paranoid traits, specifically, and externalizing-spectrum psychopathology more generally, whereas borderline traits and internalizing-spectrum psychopathology were uniquely associated with low interpersonal warmth. Among smaller subsamples of inmates followed prospectively, high dominance and, to a lesser extent, low warmth predicted general and aggressive institutional misconduct, whereas dominance uniquely predicted staff ratings of treatment noncompliance/failure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
近年来,人们对将严重反社会行为个体的人际风格概念化的兴趣有所增加。本研究通过《人格评估量表》(L.莫雷,2007年)的量表对人际支配和温暖进行操作化,在多个男性监狱囚犯样本(合并N = 1062)中考察了人际支配和温暖与人格、精神病理学及行为之间的相关性。与理论一致,多变量分析表明,低温暖以及在较小程度上的高支配与反社会和偏执特质相关,具体而言,更普遍地与外化型精神病理学相关,而边缘性特质和内化型精神病理学则与低人际温暖独特相关。在对囚犯进行前瞻性跟踪的较小子样本中,高支配以及在较小程度上的低温暖预测了一般和攻击性的机构不当行为,而支配则独特地预测了工作人员对治疗不依从/失败的评分。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2009美国心理学会,保留所有权利)