Picker S M, Oustianskaia L, Schneider V, Gathof B S
Transfusion Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany.
Vox Sang. 2009 Jul;97(1):26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01176.x. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
To examine if different pathogen-reduction technologies (PRTs) induce different degrees of platelet (PLT) storage lesion.
Twenty-seven split triple-dose apheresis PLTs were PRT treated using ultraviolet light with either riboflavin (M) or psoralen (I) or remained untreated (C). Samples taken on days (d) 0 to 8 were analysed for PLT count, blood gas (pH, pO(2) and pCO(2)), metabolism (lactate, glucose, ATP content), in vitro function [swirling, hypotonic shock response (HSR) and aggregation], activation (p-selectin expression) and cellular integrity (JC-1 signal, annexin A5 release).
Platelet counts of all study groups remained unchanged during storage indicating that PRT treatment did not induce relevant cell lysis. Although M units demonstrated the highest values for HSR until d5, PRT treatment lowered all parameters examined with significant differences to untreated controls by d7 of storage. During final storage, M was significantly superior over I for HSR, aggregation with TRAP-6 as agonist (collagen was similar), annexin A5 release and JC-1 signal. Regarding blood gas and metabolic analysis, the most evident effect of PRT was an elevated glycolytic flux combined with higher acidity due to increased lactate accumulation. Most likely due to impaired O(2) consumption, pH and ATP decreased more rapidly in I relative to C and M.
Pathogen reduction technology-treated PLTs remained comparable to untreated units throughout 7 days of storage. Mitochondria-based oxidative respiration appeared up-regulated after the riboflavin-based PRT. Compared to the psoralen-based PRT, this resulted in significantly better ATP maintenance and in vitro function during the last storage period (d7, d8).
研究不同的病原体灭活技术(PRT)是否会导致不同程度的血小板(PLT)储存损伤。
将27份三剂量分离单采血小板进行PRT处理,其中一组使用核黄素(M)进行紫外线处理,一组使用补骨脂素(I)进行紫外线处理,另一组不做处理(C)。对第0至8天采集的样本进行血小板计数、血气分析(pH、pO₂和pCO₂)、代谢分析(乳酸、葡萄糖、ATP含量)、体外功能分析[涡旋、低渗休克反应(HSR)和聚集]、活化分析(p-选择素表达)以及细胞完整性分析(JC-1信号、膜联蛋白A5释放)。
所有研究组的血小板计数在储存期间均保持不变,表明PRT处理未引起相关的细胞裂解。尽管在第5天之前M组的HSR值最高,但到储存第7天时,PRT处理降低了所有检测参数,与未处理的对照组相比存在显著差异。在最终储存期间,M组在HSR、以TRAP-6为激动剂的聚集(以胶原蛋白为激动剂时结果相似)、膜联蛋白A5释放和JC-1信号方面显著优于I组。关于血气和代谢分析,PRT最明显的影响是糖酵解通量增加,同时由于乳酸积累增加导致酸度升高。很可能由于氧气消耗受损,I组的pH和ATP相对于C组和M组下降得更快。
经过病原体灭活技术处理的血小板在7天储存期内与未处理的血小板相当。基于核黄素的PRT处理后,基于线粒体的氧化呼吸似乎上调。与基于补骨脂素的PRT相比,这导致在最后储存期(第7天、第8天)ATP维持和体外功能显著更好。