Glaholt Mackenzie G, Reingold Eyal M
University of Toronto at Mississauga, Department of Psychology, 3359 Mississauga Road N., RM 2037B, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6 Canada.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):445-50. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.445.
We tested predictions derived from the gaze cascade model of preference decision making (Shimojo, Simion, Shimojo, & Scheier, 2003; Simion & Shimojo, 2006, 2007). In each trial, participants' eye movements were monitored while they performed an eight-alternative decision task in which four of the items in the array were preexposed prior to the trial. Replicating previous findings, we found a gaze bias toward the chosen item prior to the response. However, contrary to the prediction of the gaze cascade model, preexposure of stimuli decreased, rather than increased, the magnitude of the gaze bias in preference decisions. Furthermore, unlike the prediction of the model, preexposure did not affect the likelihood of an item being chosen, and the pattern of looking behavior in preference decisions and on a non preference control task was remarkably similar. Implications of the present findings in multistage models of decision making are discussed.
我们对偏好决策的注视级联模型(Shimojo、Simion、Shimojo和Scheier,2003年;Simion和Shimojo,2006年、2007年)得出的预测进行了测试。在每个试验中,参与者在执行一项八选一决策任务时,其眼球运动受到监测,在该任务中,阵列中的四个项目在试验前预先曝光。重复先前的研究结果,我们发现在做出反应之前,注视存在偏向所选项目的偏差。然而,与注视级联模型的预测相反,刺激的预先曝光降低而非增加了偏好决策中注视偏差的程度。此外,与模型的预测不同,预先曝光并未影响项目被选中的可能性,并且偏好决策中的注视行为模式与非偏好控制任务中的模式非常相似。本文讨论了这些研究结果在多阶段决策模型中的意义。