Istituto di Ricerca Gruppo CSA, Via Al Torrente 22, I-47900, Rimini, Italy.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 Jan;17(1):40-8. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0122-8. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: Murano's glass-makers have held a monopoly on quality glass-making for centuries known all over the world. Artistic glass manufacture entails exposure to complex mixtures of pollutants, including metals. A few studies have reported high levels of trace elements in marine waters, sediments and mussels around Murano and shown that emissions from Murano glass-making workshops significantly influence air quality in the Venice area. Nevertheless, to date, there is very little information on atmospheric concentrations and virtually none on atmospheric deposition fluxes of trace elements around the island. This study presents data on the distribution of trace elements in the air and atmospheric depositions around Murano, based on a 2-year sampling period.
Airborne PM10 particulate matter was collected daily in the period December 2001-June 2003 (254 air samples), and atmospheric depositions were collected every 19 +/- 6 days, in the period August 2001-July 2003 (38 samples) on the roof of the Experimental Glass Laboratory on the island of Murano. All samples were analysed by ICP-MS for As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se and Zn contents.
Atmospheric concentrations of As, Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb, Se and Zn were 1-2 orders of magnitude greater on the island of Murano than in the nearest urban areas (Venice and Mestre), with values higher than those reported for European industrial sites. The atmospheric deposition fluxes of all elements were also higher in Murano than those detected by other studies in Venice and Mestre and in the Porto Marghera industrial zone, with As, Cd, Sb and Se 1-2 orders of magnitude higher.
In order to study the spatial variability of the atmospheric fall-out, data from other sampling stations belonging to Venice atmospheric deposition monitoring networks were used. A decreasing gradient from Murano to the closer leeward stations was observed for As, Cd and Se. Pb and Zn deposition fluxes in Venice were also comparable to those observed in the Porto Marghera industrial zone, thus, indicating a similar or even higher level of contamination. Principal component analysis confirmed significant contamination from the glassworks.
As shown by our study, atmospheric loadings of metals around Murano are significant. These observations confirm that emissions from Murano also significantly influence atmospheric deposition in the Venice area. Specifically, the mean daily Cd flux in the most affected area, which includes the whole of the historic city centre of Venice, is approximately 18 microg m(-2) day(-1), i.e. more than 65 times higher than the Dutch limit and more than three times higher than that of Germany.
On the basis of our data, there is a clear-cut need for remedial action in the Lagoon of Venice. Monitoring is indispensable, so that the efficacy of remedial measures can be evaluated and appropriate information about risks for human health and well-being can be made available. The atmospheric compartment must also be considered by Italian and European law which, until now, has not yet established any standard for atmospheric deposition.
背景、目的和范围:几个世纪以来,穆拉诺的玻璃制造商一直垄断着全球优质玻璃制造。艺术玻璃制造涉及到接触复杂的污染物混合物,包括金属。一些研究报告称,在穆拉诺周围的海洋水域、沉积物和贻贝中存在高水平的微量元素,并表明穆拉诺玻璃制造车间的排放物显著影响了威尼斯地区的空气质量。然而,迄今为止,关于该岛周围大气中微量元素浓度的信息非常有限,几乎没有关于大气沉积通量的信息。本研究根据 2 年的采样期,提供了穆拉诺岛周围空气中微量元素的分布数据。
2001 年 12 月至 2003 年 6 月期间(254 个空气样本),每日采集大气中 PM10 颗粒物,2001 年 8 月至 2003 年 7 月期间(38 个样本),每 19 +/- 6 天采集一次大气沉降物,采集地点在穆拉诺岛上的实验玻璃实验室屋顶。所有样本均采用 ICP-MS 分析砷、镉、铬、铜、铁、锰、镍、铅、锑、硒和锌的含量。
与最近的城市(威尼斯和梅斯特雷)相比,穆拉诺岛上的大气中砷、镉、铬、镍、铅、硒和锌的浓度高出 1-2 个数量级,其值高于欧洲工业场地的报告值。与威尼斯和梅斯特雷以及马格拉港工业区的其他研究相比,所有元素的大气沉积通量也较高,其中砷、镉、锑和硒的浓度高出 1-2 个数量级。
为了研究大气沉降的空间变异性,使用了属于威尼斯大气沉降监测网络的其他采样站的数据。在靠近下风方向的穆拉诺站,观察到砷、镉和硒的浓度呈递减梯度。在威尼斯,铅和锌的沉积通量也与马格拉港工业区的观测值相当,因此表明存在类似甚至更高水平的污染。主成分分析证实了玻璃厂的严重污染。
正如我们的研究所示,穆拉诺周围的金属大气负荷非常显著。这些观察结果证实,穆拉诺的排放物也显著影响了威尼斯地区的大气沉降。具体来说,在受影响最严重的地区(包括威尼斯历史市中心的整个地区),每日平均镉通量约为 18 微克/平方米/天,即比荷兰的限值高出 65 倍,比德国的限值高出 3 倍以上。
根据我们的数据,威尼斯泻湖地区显然需要采取补救措施。监测是必不可少的,以便评估补救措施的效果,并提供有关人类健康和福祉风险的适当信息。意大利和欧洲法律也必须考虑到大气这一组成部分,到目前为止,该法律尚未为大气沉积制定任何标准。