Suppr超能文献

一项针对在静态-99量表上被判定为高风险和低风险的两组性犯罪者的比较研究。

A comparative study of two groups of sex offenders identified as high and low risk on the static-99.

作者信息

Coxe Ray, Holmes William

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):137-53. doi: 10.1080/10538710902743925.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify possible differences between high- and low-risk sex offenders. The subjects included 285 sex offenders on probation. They were evaluated with the Static-99, Abel Assessment, Raven's, and MMPI-2. A criminal history review identified the number of prior offenses and the age/sex category in the index offense. The high- and low-risk groups were compared on 26 variables: intelligence, age, criminal history, denial patterns, measured sexual interest in children, admission of sexual interests, a childhood history of sexual abuse, victim's age, and personality variables. Four variables significantly accounted for 64% of the variance: age, prior number of felonies, the Cognitive Distortion Score, and the MMPI-2 Infrequency scale score.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定高风险和低风险性犯罪者之间可能存在的差异。研究对象包括285名缓刑期内的性犯罪者。他们接受了Static-99、阿贝尔评估、瑞文测试和明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)的评估。犯罪历史回顾确定了先前犯罪的次数以及指数犯罪中的年龄/性别类别。对高风险和低风险组在26个变量上进行了比较:智力、年龄、犯罪历史、否认模式、对儿童的性兴趣测量、性兴趣的承认、童年性虐待史、受害者年龄和人格变量。四个变量显著解释了64%的方差:年龄、先前重罪的数量、认知扭曲得分和MMPI-2低频量表得分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验