• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对在静态-99量表上被判定为高风险和低风险的两组性犯罪者的比较研究。

A comparative study of two groups of sex offenders identified as high and low risk on the static-99.

作者信息

Coxe Ray, Holmes William

出版信息

J Child Sex Abus. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):137-53. doi: 10.1080/10538710902743925.

DOI:10.1080/10538710902743925
PMID:19306203
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify possible differences between high- and low-risk sex offenders. The subjects included 285 sex offenders on probation. They were evaluated with the Static-99, Abel Assessment, Raven's, and MMPI-2. A criminal history review identified the number of prior offenses and the age/sex category in the index offense. The high- and low-risk groups were compared on 26 variables: intelligence, age, criminal history, denial patterns, measured sexual interest in children, admission of sexual interests, a childhood history of sexual abuse, victim's age, and personality variables. Four variables significantly accounted for 64% of the variance: age, prior number of felonies, the Cognitive Distortion Score, and the MMPI-2 Infrequency scale score.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定高风险和低风险性犯罪者之间可能存在的差异。研究对象包括285名缓刑期内的性犯罪者。他们接受了Static-99、阿贝尔评估、瑞文测试和明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)的评估。犯罪历史回顾确定了先前犯罪的次数以及指数犯罪中的年龄/性别类别。对高风险和低风险组在26个变量上进行了比较:智力、年龄、犯罪历史、否认模式、对儿童的性兴趣测量、性兴趣的承认、童年性虐待史、受害者年龄和人格变量。四个变量显著解释了64%的方差:年龄、先前重罪的数量、认知扭曲得分和MMPI-2低频量表得分。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of two groups of sex offenders identified as high and low risk on the static-99.一项针对在静态-99量表上被判定为高风险和低风险的两组性犯罪者的比较研究。
J Child Sex Abus. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):137-53. doi: 10.1080/10538710902743925.
2
Predictors of child pornography offenses and child sexual abuse in a community sample of pedophiles and hebephiles.在恋童癖和恋童癖患者的社区样本中,预测儿童色情犯罪和儿童性虐待的因素。
Sex Abuse. 2011 Jun;23(2):212-42. doi: 10.1177/1079063210382043. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
3
MMPI profile subtypes of incarcerated sex offenders against children.针对儿童的在押性犯罪者的明尼苏达多相人格调查表剖面图亚型。
Violence Vict. 1991 Fall;6(3):201-12.
4
The criminal histories and later offending of child pornography offenders.儿童色情制品罪犯的犯罪史及后续犯罪行为。
Sex Abuse. 2005 Apr;17(2):201-10. doi: 10.1177/107906320501700209.
5
Patterns of denial in sex offenders: a replication study.性犯罪者的否认模式:一项重复研究。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(3):336-44.
6
Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses.男性网络性犯罪者的接触性性犯罪。
Sex Abuse. 2011 Mar;23(1):124-45. doi: 10.1177/1079063210369013. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
7
Sexual preferences and recidivism of sex offenders with mental retardation.患有智力障碍的性犯罪者的性偏好与再犯情况。
Sex Abuse. 2008 Dec;20(4):409-25. doi: 10.1177/1079063208324662.
8
Undetected and detected child sexual abuse and child pornography offenders.未被发现的和已被发现的儿童性虐待和儿童色情制品罪犯。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 May-Jun;35(3):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
Female sexual-offenders: personality pathology as a mediator of the relationship between childhood sexual abuse history and sexual abuse perpetration against others.女性性犯罪者:人格病理学作为童年性虐待史与对他人实施性虐待之间关系的调节因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Aug;31(8):871-83. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
10
Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: a review and meta-analysis.儿童性虐待犯罪的风险因素:一项综述与荟萃分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 May;32(5):529-48. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.005. Epub 2008 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Older Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses: A Literature Review.老年人性犯罪:文献综述。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Apr;34(3):341-371. doi: 10.1177/10790632211024244. Epub 2021 Jun 26.