Kawatani Yasushi, Sugahara Shinya, Kamiya Ichiro, Nakagaki Toshiaki, Kira Marimo, Kazama Tomiei
The Surgical Operation Center, National Defense Medical College Hospital, Tokorozawa 359-8513.
Masui. 2009 Mar;58(3):363-77.
Recently there are growing number of patients suffering from the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and we have many occasions to anesthetize these patients under coagulation therapy as well. Moreover, the risk of epidural hematoma increases when the operation of the AAA is performed with epidural technique because the operation is usually done with perioperative heparinization. For these reasons, we investigated the current situations of clinical practice in Japan in terms of the epidural anesthesia for AAA surgeries.
The questionnaires were sent to all 998 Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists certified training hospitals in October 2005, anonymously asking about current practices concerning AAA cases, anesthetic managements, use of epidural anesthesia and the experience of any complications. Fifty one per cent of the total questionnaires were returned and 94% of them could be analyzed. Seventeen per cent of responders were from university institutes or university related hospitals and 75% of them were from general hospitals of secondary critical care centers.
This survey showed that the operations of AAA were done at 308 (64% of the responders) hospitals and the total number of AAA surgeries carried out was estimated to be 6,321 the last year. This figure was very close to the number announced by Japan Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons. The epidural anesthesia was routinely used for AAA surgeries with general anesthesia in 224 hospitals (64%), but it was not used in 51 hospitals (14%). The standard protocol for the application of epidural anesthesia had been installed in 56% of hospitals and mostly in 187 hospitals (as several answers can be chosen). The epidural catheters were inserted the day before operation. There were 113 hospitals in which less than 2 hours was required from epidural puncture to heparinization, but in 141 hospitals it took more than 12 hours. However, on the contrary, many anesthetists answered that the risk of the epidural hematoma had been the cause of not routinely using the epidural anesthesia in AAA operations. We had 30 hospitals in which epidural hematoma had occurred in the cases not limited to AAA surgery and 17 cases of them resulted in severe complications afterwards.
This investigation clarified the current situations of the clinical practice in Japan of the use of epidural anesthesia for AAA surgeries.
近年来,腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者数量不断增加,我们也经常需要为接受抗凝治疗的此类患者实施麻醉。此外,由于AAA手术通常在围手术期使用肝素化,采用硬膜外技术进行手术时硬膜外血肿的风险会增加。基于这些原因,我们调查了日本在AAA手术硬膜外麻醉方面的临床实践现状。
2005年10月,我们向日本麻醉医师协会认证的所有998家培训医院发放了问卷,匿名询问有关AAA病例的当前做法、麻醉管理、硬膜外麻醉的使用情况以及任何并发症的发生经历。共收回了51%的问卷,其中94%可以进行分析。17%的受访者来自大学机构或大学附属医院,75%来自二级重症监护中心的综合医院。
本次调查显示,308家医院(占受访者的64%)开展了AAA手术,估计去年AAA手术的总数为6321例。这一数字与日本心胸外科医师协会公布的数字非常接近。224家医院(64%)在AAA手术全身麻醉时常规使用硬膜外麻醉,但51家医院(14%)未使用。56%的医院制定了硬膜外麻醉应用的标准方案,其中大部分为187家医院(可选择多个答案)。硬膜外导管在手术前一天插入。113家医院从硬膜外穿刺到肝素化所需时间少于2小时,但141家医院则需要超过12小时。然而,相反的是,许多麻醉医生回答说,硬膜外血肿的风险是AAA手术中不常规使用硬膜外麻醉的原因。我们有30家医院发生了硬膜外血肿,不限于AAA手术病例,其中17例术后出现严重并发症。
本调查明确了日本在AAA手术中使用硬膜外麻醉的临床实践现状。