• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补偿问题:社会认知基本维度的社会生活

A question of compensation: the social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception.

作者信息

Kervyn Nicolas, Yzerbyt Vincent Y, Judd Charles M, Nunes Ana

机构信息

Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Universite catholique de Louvain, Belgium.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):828-42. doi: 10.1037/a0013320.

DOI:10.1037/a0013320
PMID:19309205
Abstract

This research examines the impact of the compensation effect between the fundamental dimensions of warmth and competence on behavioral confirmation. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with 2 groups that varied on 1 of the 2 dimensions and asked to select the questions that they wanted to pose to learn more about the groups. Participants preferred to ask negative (positive) questions about the unmanipulated dimension to the high (low) group. In Experiment 2, participants rated the 2 groups on the basis of naïve people answers to those questions. As predicted, compensation emerged. Experiment 3 involved interactions among 3 participants, 1 interviewing the other 2 using the questions selected in Experiment 1. Ratings of targets' reactions again showed compensation.

摘要

本研究考察了热情和能力这两个基本维度之间的补偿效应对行为确认的影响。在实验1中,向参与者展示了在两个维度中的一个维度上存在差异的两组人,并要求他们选择想要提出的问题,以便更多地了解这两组人。参与者更倾向于向高(低)组询问关于未被操纵维度的负面(正面)问题。在实验2中,参与者根据普通人对这些问题的回答对两组人进行评分。正如预测的那样,出现了补偿效应。实验3涉及三名参与者之间的互动,其中一名参与者使用实验1中选择的问题对另外两名参与者进行访谈。对目标反应的评分再次显示出补偿效应。

相似文献

1
A question of compensation: the social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception.补偿问题:社会认知基本维度的社会生活
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):828-42. doi: 10.1037/a0013320.
2
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence.社会认知的普遍维度:热情与能力。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
3
Compensation versus halo: the unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment.补偿与光环效应:社会判断基本维度之间的独特关系
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1110-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318602.
4
Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.社会判断的基本维度:理解能力判断与热情判断之间的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):899-913. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.
5
The Dynamics of Compensation: When Ingroup Favoritism Paves the Way for Outgroup Praise.群体内偏爱如何为群体外赞扬铺平道路:补偿的动态变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 May;43(5):587-600. doi: 10.1177/0146167216689066. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
[When power is undeserved: its effects on perception and social judgements].[当权力名不副实时:其对认知和社会判断的影响]
Psicothema. 2006 May;18(2):194-9.
7
Perceptions of obesity across the lifespan.对肥胖在整个生命周期中的认知。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S46-52. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.458.
8
The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behavior: behavioral confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference.过去的人际关系对人际行为的影响:移情社会认知过程中的行为确认。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Oct;79(4):546-62.
9
Compensation in intergroup relations: an investigation of its structural and strategic foundations.群体间关系中的补偿:对其结构和战略基础的调查。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;54(1):140-58. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12067. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.社会推理策略:属性流行率估计中投射与刻板印象的相似性权变模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):573-85. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573.

引用本文的文献

1
The many faces of compensation: The similarities and differences between social and facial models of perception.多种补偿方式:社会和面部感知模型的相似与不同。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0297887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297887. eCollection 2024.
2
How Do We Perceive a Humorous Manager? Manager Humor, Impression Management, and Employee Willingness to Work With the Manager.我们如何看待一位幽默的管理者?管理者的幽默、印象管理与员工与管理者共事的意愿。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:628350. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628350. eCollection 2021.
3
Investigating Managers' Fine-Grained Evaluation Processes in Organizations: Exploring Two Dual-Process Perspectives.
探究组织中管理者的细粒度评估过程:从两种双过程视角进行探索
Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 1;15:649941. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.649941. eCollection 2021.
4
The "Big Two" in Hiring Discrimination: Evidence From a Cross-National Field Experiment.招聘歧视的“两大因素”:跨国现场实验证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Feb;48(2):167-182. doi: 10.1177/0146167220982900. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
5
Expected Hierarchical Integration Reduces Perceptions of a Low Status Group as Less Competent than a High Status Group While Maintaining the Same Level of Perception of Warmth.预期的等级整合减少了对低地位群体能力不如高地位群体的认知,同时保持了相同程度的温暖感知。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 9;7:2068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02068. eCollection 2016.
6
Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness-Communion with Warmth and Morality.基本内容维度的各个方面:具备能力与自信的能动性——兼具温暖与道德的亲和性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;7:1810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810. eCollection 2016.
7
To Strike a Pose: No Stereotype Backlash for Power Posing Women.摆出姿势:摆姿势的女性不会受到刻板印象的反冲。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 27;7:1463. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01463. eCollection 2016.
8
Integrating The Stereotype Content Model (Warmth And Competence) And The Osgood Semantic Differential (Evaluation, Potency, And Activity).整合刻板印象内容模型(热情与能力)与奥斯古德语义分化模型(评价、效价和活跃度)。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;43(7):673-681. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1978.
9
The Innuendo Effect: Hearing the Positive but Inferring the Negative.暗指效应:听到正面内容却推断出负面含义。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan 1;48(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.001.
10
Downplaying Positive Impressions: Compensation Between Warmth and Competence in Impression Management.淡化积极印象:印象管理中热情与能力之间的补偿
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;49(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.09.001.