Perrone Lucy A, Ahmad Attiya, Veguilla Vic, Lu Xiuhua, Smith Gale, Katz Jacqueline M, Pushko Peter, Tumpey Terrence M
1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS G-16, Atlanta, GA 30333.
J Virol. 2009 Jun;83(11):5726-34. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00207-09. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
Influenza vaccines capable of inducing cross-reactive or heterotypic immunity could be an important first line of prevention against a novel subtype virus. Influenza virus-like particles (VLPs) displaying functional viral proteins are effective vaccines against replication-competent homologous virus, but their ability to induce heterotypic immunity has not been adequately tested. To measure VLP vaccine efficacy against a known influenza pandemic virus, recombinant VLPs were generated from structural proteins of the 1918 H1N1 virus. Mucosal and traditional parenteral administrations of H1N1 VLPs were compared for the ability to protect against the reconstructed 1918 virus and a highly pathogenic avian H5N1 virus isolated from a fatal human case. Mice that received two intranasal immunizations of H1N1 VLPs were largely protected against a lethal challenge with both the 1918 virus and the H5N1 virus. In contrast, mice that received two intramuscular immunizations of 1918 VLPs were only protected against a homologous virus challenge. Mucosal vaccination of mice with 1918 VLPs induced higher levels of cross-reactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies than did parenteral vaccination. Similarly, ferrets mucosally vaccinated with 1918 VLPs completely survived a lethal challenge with the H5N1 virus, while only a 50% survival rate was observed in parenterally vaccinated animals. These results suggest a strategy of VLP vaccination against a pandemic virus and one that stimulates heterotypic immunity against an influenza virus strain with threatening pandemic potential.
能够诱导交叉反应性或异型免疫的流感疫苗可能是预防新型亚型病毒的重要第一道防线。展示功能性病毒蛋白的流感病毒样颗粒(VLP)是针对具有复制能力的同源病毒的有效疫苗,但其诱导异型免疫的能力尚未得到充分测试。为了测定VLP疫苗对已知流感大流行病毒的效力,从1918年H1N1病毒的结构蛋白中制备了重组VLP。比较了H1N1 VLP的黏膜给药和传统的肠胃外给药对预防重建的1918年病毒和从一例致命人类病例中分离出的高致病性禽流感H5N1病毒的能力。接受两次鼻内接种H1N1 VLP的小鼠在很大程度上受到保护,免受1918年病毒和H5N1病毒的致死性攻击。相比之下,接受两次肌肉注射1918年VLP的小鼠仅受到同源病毒攻击的保护。用1918年VLP对小鼠进行黏膜疫苗接种比肠胃外疫苗接种诱导出更高水平的交叉反应性免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和IgA抗体。同样,用1918年VLP进行黏膜疫苗接种的雪貂在受到H5N1病毒的致死性攻击后完全存活,而在接受肠胃外疫苗接种的动物中仅观察到50%的存活率。这些结果提示了一种针对大流行病毒的VLP疫苗接种策略,以及一种刺激针对具有潜在大流行威胁的流感病毒株的异型免疫的策略。