Philippe Frederick L, Vallerand Robert J, Andrianarisoa Joéline, Brunel Philippe
Human Motivation Laboratory, Departmetn of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009 Feb;31(1):77-96. doi: 10.1123/jsep.31.1.77.
The present research examined in two studies the role of passion for refereeing in referees' affective and cognitive functioning during games. In line with past research on the dualistic model of passion (Vallerand et al., 2003), Study 1 (n1=90 and n2=148) revealed that harmonious passion (HP) for refereeing was positively associated with positive emotions and the experience of flow during games. Conversely, obsessive passion (OP) for refereeing was unrelated to positive emotions and flow, but was positively associated with negative emotional experiences during games. Study 2 (n=227) examined referees' affective and cognitive functioning after having committed an important mistake. Results showed that HP was negatively associated with maladaptive affective and cognitive functioning after a bad call, whereas OP was positively associated with such maladaptive functioning, including subsequent poor decision making. In addition, in both studies, most referees reported to be passionate toward refereeing. Finally, results from both studies remained the same after controlling for referees' gender, age, years of experience, and types of sports.
本研究通过两项研究考察了裁判热情在比赛期间裁判情感和认知功能中的作用。与以往关于热情二元模型的研究(瓦勒兰德等人,2003年)一致,研究1(n1 = 90,n2 = 148)表明,裁判的和谐热情(HP)与比赛期间的积极情绪和流畅体验呈正相关。相反,裁判的强迫性热情(OP)与积极情绪和流畅体验无关,但与比赛期间的负面情绪体验呈正相关。研究2(n = 227)考察了裁判犯了一个重大错误后的情感和认知功能。结果表明,在误判后,和谐热情与适应不良的情感和认知功能呈负相关,而强迫性热情与这种适应不良的功能呈正相关,包括随后的决策失误。此外,在两项研究中,大多数裁判都表示对裁判工作充满热情。最后,在控制了裁判的性别、年龄、经验年限和运动类型后,两项研究的结果保持不变。