Bureau Alexander T, Blom Lindsey C, Bolin Jocelyn, Nagelkirk Paul
School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;12(5):122-135. doi: 10.70252/ZRWI2865. eCollection 2019.
Research into the Dualistic Model of Passion (DMP) has suggested that a harmonious passion for an activity is related to more positive outcomes (e.g., higher well-being and satisfaction with life), and an obsessive passion for an activity is related to negative and less adaptive outcomes (e.g., lower self-esteem and burnout; 37, 40, 43). The current study demonstrated differences between passion types (i.e., harmonious passion, obsessive passion, no passion) in terms of physical fitness, risk of exercise addiction, frequency of exercise, and perceptions of exercise. Sixty-one college students from a large, Midwestern university completed the study. A MANOVA with the self-report exercise behavior/perceptions measures ((8, 96) = 3.94, p<.001, Wilk's λ= 0.58) was significant with post-hoc analyses revealing significant differences ( 0.05) between obsessive, harmonious, and non-passionate individuals on time in vigorous activity, risk of exercise addiction, and perceptions of exercise, with no significant differences in fitness levels. Obsessive individuals spend more time in vigorous exercise and are most at risk for exercise addiction, while harmonious individuals do not differ from obsessive on time in vigorous activity and are between obsessive and non-passionate individuals for risk of exercise addiction. The MANOVA with physical fitness indicators (body fat, VO, completed push-ups and curl-ups) revealed no significant differences between the passion groups, but follow-up ANOVAs examining trends indicated differences in body fat and pushups, with non-passionate individuals having higher body fat and fewer pushups than the two passion groups. The findings of this study partially support the Dualistic Model of Passion and previous research findings, and these findings demonstrate interactions between passion and performance in fitness tasks.
对激情二元模型（DMP）的研究表明，对一项活动的和谐激情与更积极的结果相关（例如，更高的幸福感和生活满意度），而对一项活动的强迫性激情则与消极且适应性较差的结果相关（例如，更低的自尊和倦怠；37, 40, 43）。当前的研究表明，在身体素质、运动成瘾风险、运动频率和运动认知方面，不同类型的激情（即和谐激情、强迫性激情、无激情）存在差异。来自中西部一所大型大学的61名大学生完成了这项研究。一项多变量方差分析（MANOVA），其自我报告的运动行为/认知测量结果（(8, 96) = 3.94, p <.001, Wilk's λ = 0.58）具有显著性，事后分析显示，在剧烈活动时间、运动成瘾风险和运动认知方面，强迫性、和谐性和无激情个体之间存在显著差异（p < 0.05），而在身体素质水平上没有显著差异。强迫性个体在剧烈运动中花费的时间更多，且运动成瘾风险最高，而和谐性个体在剧烈活动时间上与强迫性个体没有差异，在运动成瘾风险方面则介于强迫性个体和无激情个体之间。对身体素质指标（体脂、VO、完成的俯卧撑和仰卧起坐）进行的多变量方差分析显示，不同激情组之间没有显著差异，但后续的方差分析（ANOVA）检查趋势表明，体脂和俯卧撑存在差异，无激情个体的体脂比两个激情组更高，俯卧撑比两个激情组更少。本研究的结果部分支持了激情二元模型和先前的研究结果，这些结果表明了激情与健身任务表现之间的相互作用。
