Human Rights Watch, New York, USA.
Glob Public Health. 2009;4(6):528-45. doi: 10.1080/17441690802128321.
There has long been recognition that individual risk factors can only partially explain vulnerability to HIV infection, and that a broader range of socioeconomic, cultural and political factors must be taken into account. More recently this understanding has been applied to addressing obstacles to accessing HIV treatment. Yet, while structural interventions aimed at contextual factors related to HIV prevention and treatment have been shown to be effective, they have not been widely implemented. Using the situation of Zimbabwe as an example, we will present an illustration of how contextual barriers can be understood in human rights terms, and how using a human rights analysis can specifically help define 'structural-rights' interventions and compel their implementation.
长期以来,人们已经认识到,个体风险因素只能部分解释对 HIV 感染的易感性,必须考虑更广泛的社会经济、文化和政治因素。最近,这种理解已被应用于解决获得 HIV 治疗的障碍。然而,尽管旨在解决与 HIV 预防和治疗相关的背景因素的结构性干预措施已被证明是有效的,但它们尚未得到广泛实施。我们将以津巴布韦的情况为例,说明如何从人权的角度理解背景障碍,以及如何使用人权分析来具体定义“结构性权利”干预措施,并迫使它们得到执行。