• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国跨学科支持护理科的初步评估。

Pilot evaluation of a French interdisciplinary supportive care department.

机构信息

Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75.246, Paris Cedex 05, France.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2009 Dec;17(12):1507-16. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0617-3. Epub 2009 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-009-0617-3
PMID:19343371
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This pilot study was designed to evaluate the impact of management by the Interdisciplinary Supportive Care Department for Cancer Patients (Département Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support pour le Patient en Oncologie-DISSPO) at the Institut Curie in Paris, France on patient quality of life and satisfaction with care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients hospitalised for cancer treatment and referred to DISSPO during their hospitalisation were invited to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and patient satisfaction (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) questionnaires during the week following their initial management by DISSPO (T0) and 2 months later (T1). These patients were compared with control patients matched for age, gender, ward and period of hospitalisation in terms of quality of life and satisfaction with care.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred fourteen (77%) DISSPO patients at T0 and 72 (48%) patients at T1 and 102 (89%) control patients at T0 and 66 (57%) at T1 returned their completed questionnaires. Baseline characteristics of DISSPO patients and control patients were significantly different in terms of duration of the current hospitalisation, interval between the date of diagnosis of the cancer and inclusion in the study (both longer for DISSPO patients) and Karnofsky performance status (lower for DISSPO patients). For the 43 pairs of patients who completed the questionnaires at the two time points, significant independent positive effects of management by DISSPO and age (less than or equal to 60 years) were demonstrated for patient satisfaction in relation to the availability of the nursing and paramedical team. In particular, patients over the age of 60 not managed by DISSPO presented a significant reduction of patient satisfaction scores over the 2 months compared to age-matched patients managed by DISSPO.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of cancer patients by an interdisciplinary supportive care department appears to have a positive impact on patient satisfaction in relation to availability of the nursing and paramedical team. These results need to be confirmed in a larger study.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在评估法国巴黎居里研究所(Institut Curie)的肿瘤患者多学科支持护理部(Département Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support pour le Patient en Oncologie-DISSPO)对患者生活质量和护理满意度的影响。

材料和方法

住院接受癌症治疗并在住院期间被转介至 DISSPO 的患者被邀请在 DISSPO 首次管理后的一周内(T0)和 2 个月后(T1)填写欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)和患者满意度问卷(EORTC IN-PATSAT32)。这些患者与年龄、性别、病房和住院时间匹配的对照组患者进行比较,以评估生活质量和护理满意度。

主要结果

在 T0 时,114 名(77%)DISSPO 患者和 72 名(48%)T1 患者以及 102 名(89%)对照组患者和 66 名(57%)T1 患者返回了完成的问卷。DISSPO 患者和对照组患者的基线特征在当前住院时间、癌症诊断日期和纳入研究之间的间隔(均为 DISSPO 患者较长)和 Karnofsky 表现状态(DISSPO 患者较低)方面存在显著差异。对于在两个时间点完成问卷的 43 对患者,DISSPO 管理和年龄(小于或等于 60 岁)对护理和辅助医疗团队可用性的患者满意度有显著的独立积极影响。特别是,与年龄匹配的由 DISSPO 管理的患者相比,未接受 DISSPO 管理的 60 岁以上患者在 2 个月内的患者满意度评分显著下降。

结论

多学科支持护理部门对癌症患者的管理似乎对护理满意度有积极影响,与护理和辅助医疗团队的可用性有关。这些结果需要在更大的研究中得到证实。

相似文献

1
Pilot evaluation of a French interdisciplinary supportive care department.法国跨学科支持护理科的初步评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Dec;17(12):1507-16. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0617-3. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
2
A longitudinal analysis of patient satisfaction with care and quality of life in ambulatory oncology based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.基于OUT-PATSAT35问卷对门诊肿瘤患者护理满意度和生活质量的纵向分析。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Jan 25;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-42.
3
The EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire: EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Validation study for Spanish patients.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织癌症住院患者护理满意度调查问卷:针对西班牙患者的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织住院患者满意度调查32项量表验证研究
Clin Transl Oncol. 2009 Apr;11(4):237-42. doi: 10.1007/s12094-009-0346-6.
4
An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32).一项关于欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)癌症住院患者护理满意度测量指标(EORTC IN - PATSAT32)的国际前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(14):2120-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041.
5
Information exchange in oncological inpatient care--patient satisfaction, participation, and safety.肿瘤住院护理中的信息交流——患者满意度、参与度与安全性。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Apr;19(2):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
6
Determinants of patient satisfaction with care in a Spanish oncology day hospital and its relationship with quality of life.患者对西班牙肿瘤日间医院护理满意度的决定因素及其与生活质量的关系。
Psychooncology. 2013 Nov;22(11):2454-61. doi: 10.1002/pon.3307. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
7
Assessment of needs, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with care in breast cancer patients to better target supportive care.评估乳腺癌患者的需求、健康相关生活质量和对护理的满意度,以更好地确定支持性护理的目标。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Aug;24(8):2151-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt128. Epub 2013 Apr 7.
8
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Satisfaction with care: an independent outcome measure in surgical oncology.对医疗的满意度:外科肿瘤学中的一项独立结局指标。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Jun;13(6):817-22. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.08.019. Epub 2006 Apr 14.
10
Determinants of patient satisfaction in ambulatory oncology: a cross sectional study based on the OUT-PATSAT35 questionnaire.门诊肿瘤患者满意度的决定因素:基于 OUT-PATSAT35 问卷的横断面研究。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Dec 28;11:526. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-526.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review.跨专业合作与住院患者报告结局:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 13;11(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02027-x.
2
Treatment patterns and characteristics of European patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.欧洲去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的治疗模式和特征。
BMC Urol. 2013 Nov 9;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-58.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting evidence-based psychosocial care for cancer patients.促进为癌症患者提供循证心理社会护理。
Psychooncology. 2009 Jan;18(1):6-13. doi: 10.1002/pon.1468.
2
Identifying vulnerable older adults with cancer: integrating geriatric assessment into oncology practice.识别患有癌症的脆弱老年人:将老年评估纳入肿瘤学实践。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Oct;55(10):1604-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01367.x. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
3
Unmet psychosocial needs of Pennsylvanians with cancer: 1986-2005.1986 - 2005年宾夕法尼亚州癌症患者未满足的心理社会需求
Cancer. 2007 Aug 1;110(3):631-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22820.
4
Age, health, and education determine supportive care needs of men younger than 70 years with prostate cancer.年龄、健康状况和教育程度决定了70岁以下前列腺癌男性患者的支持性护理需求。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 20;25(18):2560-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.8046.
5
Life after cancer: couples' and partners' psychological adjustment and supportive care needs.癌症后的生活:夫妻及伴侣的心理调适与支持性护理需求
Support Care Cancer. 2007 Apr;15(4):405-15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0148-0. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
6
Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.采用结构化多学科干预对晚期癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):635-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.209.
7
Supportive care needs: are patients with lung cancer a neglected population?支持性护理需求:肺癌患者是被忽视的群体吗?
Psychooncology. 2006 Jun;15(6):509-16. doi: 10.1002/pon.983.
8
An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32).一项关于欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)癌症住院患者护理满意度测量指标(EORTC IN - PATSAT32)的国际前瞻性研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(14):2120-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041.
9
Patients' perceptions of quality of care for colorectal cancer by race, ethnicity, and language.患者按种族、民族和语言对结直肠癌护理质量的认知。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 20;23(27):6576-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.102. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
10
Travelling for radiation cancer treatment: patient satisfaction.前往外地进行放射治疗癌症:患者满意度。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2005 Spring;15(2):107-19. doi: 10.5737/1181912x152107112.