• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults.与年轻人相比,老年人对选择的重视程度较低。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jun;64(4):443-6. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp021. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
2
Age and the purchase of prescription drug insurance by older adults.老年人的年龄与处方药保险的购买。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):308-20. doi: 10.1037/a0023169.
3
Age, Loss Minimization, and the Role of Probability for Decision-Making.年龄、损失最小化和概率在决策中的作用。
Gerontology. 2018;64(5):475-484. doi: 10.1159/000487636. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
When choice matters: task-dependent memory effects in older adulthood.当选择很重要时:老年期的任务依赖型记忆效应。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):923-36. doi: 10.1037/a0034520.
5
Numeracy and Medicare Part D: the importance of choice and literacy for numbers in optimizing decision making for Medicare's prescription drug program.算数能力和医疗保险处方药部分 D:在优化医疗保险处方药计划决策过程中,对数字的选择和读写能力的重要性。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):295-307. doi: 10.1037/a0022028.
6
PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25.PDP 还是 MA-PD?CMS 第 25 区的医疗保险部分 D 注册决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.002.
7
Choice set size and decision making: the case of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.选择集大小与决策:以医疗保险处方药计划为例。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):582-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357793. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
8
Older adults prefer less choice than young adults.老年人比年轻人更喜欢较少的选择。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):671-5. doi: 10.1037/a0012772.
9
Does the Medicare Part D Decision-Making Experience Differ by Rural/Urban Location?医疗保险D部分的决策体验在农村/城市地区是否存在差异?
J Rural Health. 2017 Jan;33(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12175. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects?跨三个选择领域的风险决策:年轻人和老年人对框架效应的易感性是否不同?
J Gen Psychol. 2005 Jan;132(1):81-92. doi: 10.3200/GENP.132.1.81-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between age and intellectual curiosity: the mediating roles of future time perspective and importance of curiosity.年龄与求知欲之间的关联:未来时间视角及好奇心重要性的中介作用
Eur J Ageing. 2020 Apr 27;18(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s10433-020-00567-6. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Applying Behavioral Economics to Improve Adolescent and Young Adult Health: A Developmentally-Sensitive Approach.应用行为经济学改善青少年和青年健康:一种发展敏感的方法。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jul;69(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
Complex Medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors--especially those with impaired decision making.复杂的医疗保险优势选择可能会让老年人不知所措——尤其是那些决策能力受损的老年人。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1786-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Age and the purchase of prescription drug insurance by older adults.老年人的年龄与处方药保险的购买。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):308-20. doi: 10.1037/a0023169.
5
Cohort differences in 3-year adaptation to health problems among Dutch middle-aged, 1992-1995 and 2002-2005.1992 - 1995年及2002 - 2005年荷兰中年人群对健康问题三年适应情况的队列差异
Eur J Ageing. 2010 Sep;7(3):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0157-1. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
6
Choice set size and decision making: the case of Medicare Part D prescription drug plans.选择集大小与决策:以医疗保险处方药计划为例。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):582-93. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357793. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
7
Take-up of Medicare Part D: results from the Health and Retirement Study.医疗保险部分 D 的参保情况:来自健康与退休研究的结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Jul;65(4):492-501. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp107. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes: Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults' Decision Making.成人双信息加工的年龄差异:对情感和深思熟虑过程在老年人决策中的作用的影响。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00025.x.
2
Reducing the number of drug plans for seniors: a proposal and analysis of three case studies.减少老年人的药品计划数量:三个案例研究的建议和分析。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Dec;35(6):961-97. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2010-035.
3
Older adults prefer less choice than young adults.老年人比年轻人更喜欢较少的选择。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):671-5. doi: 10.1037/a0012772.
4
Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay to reduce childhood obesity.为减少儿童肥胖症而支付意愿的条件价值评估分析。
Econ Hum Biol. 2008 Jul;6(2):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
5
Aging and variety seeking.衰老与多样化寻求
Psychol Aging. 2007 Dec;22(4):728-37. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.728.
6
Medicare prescription drug coverage: consumer information and preferences.医疗保险处方药覆盖范围:消费者信息与偏好
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 16;103(20):7929-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601837103. Epub 2006 May 8.
7
Is the informed-choice policy approach appropriate for Medicare beneficiaries?知情选择政策方法对医疗保险受益人是否合适?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun;20(3):199-203. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.199.
8
When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?当选择产生消极作用时:一个人能否对好事期望过高?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):995-1006. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.995.
9
The discrete-choice willingness-to-pay question format in health economics: should we adopt environmental guidelines?健康经济学中离散选择支付意愿问题的格式:我们应该采用环境指南吗?
Med Decis Making. 2000 Apr-Jun;20(2):194-206. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000205.
10
The contingent valuation method in health care.医疗保健中的条件价值评估法。
Health Policy. 1999 May;47(2):97-123. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00010-x.

与年轻人相比,老年人对选择的重视程度较低。

Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults.

作者信息

Mikels Joseph A, Reed Andrew E, Simon Kosali I

机构信息

Department of Human Development, Cornell University, G60 Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-4401, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jun;64(4):443-6. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp021. Epub 2009 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbp021
PMID:19357074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2905131/
Abstract

Choice is highly valued in modern society, from the supermarket to the hospital; however, it remains unknown whether older and younger adults place the same value on increased choice. The current investigation tested whether 53 older (M age = 75.44 years) versus 53 younger adults (M age = 19.58 years) placed lower value on increased choice by examining the monetary amounts they were willing to pay for increased prescription drug coverage options--important given the recently implemented Medicare prescription drug program. Results indicate that older adults placed lower value on increasing choice sets relative to younger adults, who placed progressively higher value on increasingly larger choice sets. These results are discussed regarding their implications for theory and policy.

摘要

在现代社会,从超市到医院,选择都备受重视;然而,年长者和年轻人是否对更多选择赋予相同的价值仍不明确。当前的调查通过考察53名年长者(平均年龄 = 75.44岁)和53名年轻人(平均年龄 = 19.58岁)愿意为增加处方药覆盖选项支付的金额,来测试他们是否对更多选择赋予较低的价值——鉴于最近实施的医疗保险处方药计划,这一点很重要。结果表明,相对于年轻人,年长者对增加选择集赋予的价值较低,而年轻人对越来越大的选择集赋予的价值逐渐增加。本文讨论了这些结果对理论和政策的启示。