• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂的医疗保险优势选择可能会让老年人不知所措——尤其是那些决策能力受损的老年人。

Complex Medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors--especially those with impaired decision making.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1786-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132
PMID:21852301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3513347/
Abstract

The proliferation of Medicare Advantage plans has given Medicare enrollees more choices, but these could be overwhelming for some, especially for those with impaired decision-making capabilities. We analyzed national survey data and linked Medicare enrollment data for the period 2004-07 to examine the effects on enrollment of expanded choices and benefits in the Medicare Advantage program. The availability of more plan options was associated with increased enrollment in Medicare Advantage when elderly Medicare beneficiaries chose from a limited number of plans-for example, fewer than fifteen plans. Enrollment was unchanged or decreased in Medicare Advantage when beneficiaries chose from larger numbers of plans-for example, fifteen to thirty, or more than thirty. Elderly adults with low cognitive function were less responsive to the generosity of available benefits than those with high cognitive function when choosing between traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Simplifying choices in Medicare Advantage could improve beneficiaries' enrollment decisions, strengthen value-based competition among plans, and extend the benefits of choice to seniors with impaired cognition. It could also lower their out-of-pocket costs.

摘要

医疗保险优势计划的激增为医疗保险参保人提供了更多的选择,但对于一些人来说,这些选择可能会让人不知所措,尤其是对于那些决策能力受损的人。我们分析了 2004 年至 2007 年期间的全国调查数据,并将医疗保险参保数据进行了关联,以研究医疗保险优势计划中扩大选择和福利对参保的影响。当老年医疗保险受益人从有限数量的计划中选择时,例如选择少于十五个计划,更多的计划选择与医疗保险优势计划的参保人数增加有关。当受益人从更多的计划中选择时,例如十五到三十个,或者三十个以上,医疗保险优势计划的参保人数保持不变或减少。在选择传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划时,认知功能较低的老年人对可用福利的慷慨程度反应不如认知功能较高的老年人敏感。在医疗保险优势计划中简化选择可以改善受益人的参保决策,加强计划之间基于价值的竞争,并将选择的好处扩展到认知能力受损的老年人。这也可以降低他们的自付费用。

相似文献

1
Complex Medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors--especially those with impaired decision making.复杂的医疗保险优势选择可能会让老年人不知所措——尤其是那些决策能力受损的老年人。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1786-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
2
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.健康保险素养与传统医疗保险、医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险优势计划内计划特征的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2146792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46792.
3
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
4
Determinants of Medicare plan choices: are beneficiaries more influenced by premiums or benefits?医疗保险计划选择的决定因素:受益人受保费还是福利的影响更大?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul;21(7):498-504.
5
Plan Switching and Stickiness in Medicare Advantage: A Qualitative Interview With Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划中的转换和粘性:对医疗保险优势计划受益人的定性访谈。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Dec;78(6):693-702. doi: 10.1177/1077558720944284. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
6
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
7
Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of and choices regarding Part D, 2005 to the present.医疗保险受益人对药品部分(Part D)的了解和选择,2005 年至今。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May;58(5):950-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02812.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
8
Seniors don't use Medicare.Gov: how do eligible beneficiaries obtain information about Medicare Advantage Plans in the United States?老年人不使用 Medicare.gov:符合条件的受益人如何获取有关美国 Medicare Advantage 计划的信息?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06135-7.
9
Voluntary disenrollment from Medicare advantage plans: valuable signals of market performance.主动退出医疗保险优势计划:市场表现的重要信号。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Dec;13(12):677-84.
10
Medicare Advantage: options for standardizing benefits and information to improve consumer choice.医疗保险优势:规范福利和信息以改善消费者选择的方案。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 Apr;33:1-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Older adults living with dementia enrolled in similar Medicare Advantage plans compared to those without dementia.与没有痴呆症的老年人相比,患有痴呆症的老年人参加了类似的医疗保险优势计划。
Alzheimers Dement Behav Socioecon Aging. 2025 Jun;1(2). doi: 10.1002/bsa3.70016. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.应对复杂性:一款用户友好型医疗保险D部分患者决策辅助工具的开发与试点测试
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):868-878. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.868.
3
Associations of Medicare Advantage Enrollment Duration with Health Insurance Literacy and Access to and Affordability of Health Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Health insurance exchanges -- key link in a better-value chain.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 10;362(23):2147-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1004758. Epub 2010 May 12.
2
Health insurance exchanges--making the markets work.医保交易所——让市场发挥作用。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1135-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0906246. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
3
Payment reduction and Medicare private fee-for-service plans.费用削减与医疗保险私人按服务付费计划。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2009 Spring;30(3):15-24.
医疗保险优势参保时长与健康保险素养以及医疗保健的可及性和可负担性之间的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09628-x.
4
Care Continuity, Nephrologists' Dialysis Facility Preferences, and Outcomes.护理连续性、肾病学家对透析设施的偏好及结果
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Apr 4;6(4):e250423. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0423.
5
Growth Of Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries, 2011-24.2011 - 2024年双重资格受益人群中慢性病特殊需求计划的发展情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Mar;44(3):304-312. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00651.
6
Changes in Out-of-Pocket Drug Expenditures Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Dementia Under the Inflation Reduction Act: A Simulation Study.《降低通胀法案》下患有痴呆症的医疗保险受益人的自付药品费用变化:一项模拟研究
Value Health. 2025 Apr;28(4):553-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.008. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
7
Medicare Resource Use Differs by English Reading Proficiency.医疗保险资源使用因英语阅读能力而异。
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 9;9(1):igae105. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae105. eCollection 2025.
8
Estimating financial and health burden by initial Medicare plan choice and history of cancer.根据初始医疗保险计划选择和癌症病史估算财务和健康负担。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 21;3(1):qxaf001. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf001. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Should I stay or should I go again: Multiple switching between fee-for-service Medicare and Medicare advantage among older beneficiaries.我该留下还是再次离开:老年受益人群中按服务收费的医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划之间的多次转换
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14398. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14398. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
10
Contract Termination and Insurance Enrollment Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势受益人的合同终止和保险登记。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428267. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28267.
4
How much choice is too much? The case of the Medicare prescription drug benefit.多少选择才算过多?医疗保险处方药福利的案例。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1157-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00981.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
5
2009 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2009年阿尔茨海默病事实与数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2009 May;5(3):234-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.03.001.
6
Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults.与年轻人相比,老年人对选择的重视程度较低。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jun;64(4):443-6. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp021. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
7
Managed care and medical expenditures of Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的管理式医疗与医疗支出
J Health Econ. 2008 Dec;27(6):1451-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.07.014. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
8
Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States.美国无痴呆的认知障碍患病率。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):427-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00005.
9
Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study.美国痴呆症患病率:老龄化、人口统计学与记忆研究
Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1-2):125-32. doi: 10.1159/000109998. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
10
Medicare Advantage in 2006-2007: what Congress intended?2006 - 2007年的医疗保险优势计划:国会的意图是什么?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):w445-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.w445. Epub 2007 May 15.