• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在情绪激活水平、情绪状态和个人情绪变化理论背景下的消退影响偏差。

The fading affect bias in the context of emotion activation level, mood, and personal theories of emotion change.

作者信息

Ritchie Timothy, Skowronski John J, Hartnett Jessica, Wells Brett, Walker W Richard

机构信息

University of Southampton, Psychology Department, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Memory. 2009 May;17(4):428-44. doi: 10.1080/09658210902791665.

DOI:10.1080/09658210902791665
PMID:19358015
Abstract

The intensity of emotions associated with memory of pleasant events generally fades more slowly across time than the intensity of emotions associated with memory of unpleasant events, a phenomenon known as the fading affect bias (FAB). Four studies examined variables that might account for, or moderate, the bias. These included the activation level of the emotions, individual differences in dispositional mood, and participant expectations of emotion change across time. Results suggest that (a) although emotion activation level was related to overall fading of affect, it was unrelated to the FAB; (b) dispositional mood moderated the FAB, but could not fully account for it; and (c) although participants' predictions of event-related emotion change across time were somewhat veridical, the FAB emerged even when these predictions were accounted for statistically. Methodological and theoretical implications for research on the affect associated with autobiographical events are discussed.

摘要

与愉快事件记忆相关的情绪强度通常会随着时间的推移比与不愉快事件记忆相关的情绪强度消退得更慢,这一现象被称为消退情感偏差(FAB)。四项研究考察了可能解释或调节这种偏差的变量。这些变量包括情绪的激活水平、性格情绪的个体差异以及参与者对情绪随时间变化的预期。结果表明:(a)尽管情绪激活水平与情感的总体消退有关,但与消退情感偏差无关;(b)性格情绪调节了消退情感偏差,但不能完全解释它;(c)尽管参与者对事件相关情绪随时间变化的预测在一定程度上是准确的,但即使在对这些预测进行统计分析后,消退情感偏差仍然存在。文中讨论了自传体事件相关情感研究的方法学和理论意义。

相似文献

1
The fading affect bias in the context of emotion activation level, mood, and personal theories of emotion change.在情绪激活水平、情绪状态和个人情绪变化理论背景下的消退影响偏差。
Memory. 2009 May;17(4):428-44. doi: 10.1080/09658210902791665.
2
The fading affect bias across alcohol consumption frequency for alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related events.饮酒频率对与酒精相关和非酒精相关事件的淡出影响偏向。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Dec;22(4):1340-51. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
3
"Don't worry; you really will get over it": methodological investigations of the fading affect bias.“别担心,你肯定能挺过去的”:消退情绪偏见的方法学研究
Am J Psychol. 2009 Summer;122(2):209-17.
4
Memories for emotional autobiographical events following unilateral damage to medial temporal lobe.单侧内侧颞叶损伤后情感性自传体事件的记忆
Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):115-27. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh672. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
5
A pancultural perspective on the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory.自传体记忆中消退情绪偏见的跨文化视角。
Memory. 2015;23(2):278-90. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.884138. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Why people rehearse their memories: frequency of use and relations to the intensity of emotions associated with autobiographical memories.人们为什么要排练自己的记忆:使用频率与与自传体记忆相关的情绪强度的关系。
Memory. 2009 Oct;17(7):760-73. doi: 10.1080/09658210903107846. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
7
Remembering everyday experience through the prism of self-esteem.通过自尊的视角来铭记日常经历。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;29(1):51-62. doi: 10.1177/0146167202238371.
8
A content analysis of involuntary autobiographical memories: examining the positivity effect in old age.非自愿自传体记忆的内容分析:探究老年期的积极效应。
Memory. 2006 Feb;14(2):161-75. doi: 10.1080/09658210544000024.
9
Individual differences in emotional processing and autobiographical memory: interoceptive awareness and alexithymia in the fading affect bias.情绪加工与自传体记忆中的个体差异:消退情绪偏向中的内感受觉知与述情障碍
Cogn Emot. 2017 Nov;31(7):1392-1404. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1225005. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
10
Testing the fading affect bias for healthy coping in the context of death.在死亡情境中测试消退影响偏差对健康应对的作用。
Death Stud. 2016 Sep;40(8):513-527. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2016.1186760. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for a fading affect bias in subjectively assessed affect changes in autobiographical memory.关于在主观评估的自传体记忆情感变化中存在消退情感偏差的证据。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1608751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1608751. eCollection 2025.
2
In-Person and Online Studies Examining the Influence of Problem Solving on the Fading Affect Bias.考察问题解决对消退情感偏差影响的线下和线上研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;14(9):806. doi: 10.3390/bs14090806.
3
Writing to your past-self can make you feel better.给过去的自己写信能让你感觉更好。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 27;15:1327595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1327595. eCollection 2024.
4
Predicting the likelihood and amount of fading, fixed, flourishing, and flexible positive and negative affect of autobiographical memories.预测自传体记忆中积极和消极的淡出、固定、繁荣和灵活的可能性和程度。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):872-893. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01507-2. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
5
Time heals all wounds? Naïve theories about the fading of affect associated with autobiographical events.时间能治愈一切创伤?关于与自传体事件相关的情感消退的天真理论。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1715-1728. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01426-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
6
The power of negative and positive episodic memories.消极和积极情节记忆的力量。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):869-903. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01013-z. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
A Fading Affect Bias First: Specific Healthy Coping with Partner-Esteem for Romantic Relationship and Non-Relationship Events.先出现情感消退偏差:特定的健康应对策略对伴侣自尊的浪漫关系和非关系事件的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 26;18(19):10121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910121.
8
The Effect of Memory in Inducing Pleasant Emotions with Musical and Pictorial Stimuli.音乐和图像刺激引发愉悦情绪的记忆效应。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 5;8(1):17638. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35899-y.
9
Grief and Avoidant Death Attitudes Combine to Predict the Fading Affect Bias.悲伤和回避死亡态度的结合可以预测情感消退偏见。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 13;15(8):1736. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081736.
10
Chinese and Australians showed difference in mental time travel in emotion and content but not specificity.中国人和澳大利亚人在情绪和内容的心理时间旅行方面存在差异,但在特异性方面没有差异。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 26;6:879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00879. eCollection 2015.