• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终前一年的医疗保健费用以及所有获得的生命年数对癌症筛查成本效益的影响。

The impact of healthcare costs in the last year of life and in all life years gained on the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening.

作者信息

de Kok I M C M, Polder J J, Habbema J D F, Berkers L-M, Meerding W J, Rebolj M, van Ballegooijen M

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2009 Apr 21;100(8):1240-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605018.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605018
PMID:19367281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2676546/
Abstract

It is under debate whether healthcare costs related to death and in life years gained (LysG) due to life saving interventions should be included in economic evaluations. We estimated the impact of including these costs on cost-effectiveness of cancer screening. We obtained health insurance, home care, nursing homes, and mortality data for 2.1 million inhabitants in the Netherlands in 1998-1999. Costs related to death were approximated by the healthcare costs in the last year of life (LastYL), by cause and age of death. Costs in LYsG were estimated by calculating the healthcare costs in any life year. We calculated the change in cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) if unrelated healthcare costs in the LastYL or in LYsG would be included. Costs in the LastYL were on average 33% higher for persons dying from cancer than from any cause. Including costs in LysG increased the CER by 4040 euro in women, and by 4100 euro in men. Of these, 660 euro in women, and 890 euro in men, were costs in the LastYL. Including unrelated healthcare costs in the LastYL or in LYsG will change the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare programmes. The CERs of cancer screening programmes will clearly increase, with approximately 4000 euro. However, because of the favourable CER's, including unrelated healthcare costs will in general have limited policy implications.

摘要

与死亡相关的医疗保健成本以及因挽救生命的干预措施而获得的生命年(LYsG)是否应纳入经济评估,目前仍存在争议。我们估计了纳入这些成本对癌症筛查成本效益的影响。我们获取了1998 - 1999年荷兰210万居民的健康保险、家庭护理、养老院和死亡率数据。与死亡相关的成本通过生命最后一年(LastYL)的医疗保健成本,按死亡原因和年龄进行估算。LYsG中的成本通过计算任何生命年的医疗保健成本来估计。我们计算了如果将LastYL或LYsG中不相关的医疗保健成本纳入,成本效益比(CERs)的变化。死于癌症的人的LastYL平均成本比死于任何原因的人高33%。纳入LYsG中的成本使女性的CER增加了4040欧元,男性增加了4100欧元。其中,女性为660欧元,男性为890欧元,是LastYL中的成本。在LastYL或LYsG中纳入不相关的医疗保健成本将改变医疗保健项目的相对成本效益。癌症筛查项目的CERs将明显增加,约为4000欧元。然而,由于CERs较好,纳入不相关的医疗保健成本通常对政策影响有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/a078ff03e94c/6605018f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/6c88ad284920/6605018f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/540c52ed8429/6605018f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/a078ff03e94c/6605018f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/6c88ad284920/6605018f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/540c52ed8429/6605018f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ea/2676546/a078ff03e94c/6605018f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of healthcare costs in the last year of life and in all life years gained on the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening.临终前一年的医疗保健费用以及所有获得的生命年数对癌症筛查成本效益的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Apr 21;100(8):1240-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605018.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Cancer Screening: Health and Costs in Life Years Gained.癌症筛查的成本效益:以获得的健康生命年和成本来衡量。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.027.
3
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.北欧国家癌症筛查对截至2017年的死亡、成本和生活质量的影响。
Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60.
4
Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice?乳腺癌筛查;在实际中具有成本效益吗?
Eur J Radiol. 2000 Jan;33(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(99)00105-9.
5
6
Cost-of-illness and disease burden of food-related pathogens in the Netherlands, 2011.荷兰 2011 年与食物相关病原体相关的疾病负担和成本。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2015 Mar 2;196:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.无关成本的相关性,包括卫生保健部门内外的成本,对二级预防成本比较分析结果的影响:以德国人群普通结直肠癌筛查为例。
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Apr;11(2):141-50. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0156-3. Epub 2009 May 17.
8
Health care costs in the last year of life--the Dutch experience.生命最后一年的医疗保健费用——荷兰的经验。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1720-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
9
Mass screening on abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 60 to 65 years in The Netherlands. Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness using a Markov model.荷兰针对60至65岁男性腹主动脉瘤的大规模筛查。使用马尔可夫模型对预期寿命和成本效益的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Jul;26(1):74-80. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1773.
10
The healthcare costs of treating human papillomavirus-related cancers in Norway.挪威治疗人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症的医疗费用。
BMC Cancer. 2019 May 7;19(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5596-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Advance directives completion and hospital out-of-pocket expenditures.预立医疗指示的完成情况与医院自付支出。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Jun;17(6):437-444. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12839. Epub 2022 May 8.
2
Colorectal Cancer: Cost-effectiveness of Colonoscopy versus CT Colonography Screening with Participation Rates and Costs.结直肠癌:基于参与率和成本的结肠镜检查与 CT 结肠成像筛查的成本效益比较。
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):901-911. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162359. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital costs of older people in New South Wales in the last year of life.新南威尔士州老年人生命最后一年的住院费用。
Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(7):383-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01306.x.
2
On future non-medical costs in economic evaluations.关于经济评估中的未来非医疗成本。
Health Econ. 2008 May;17(5):579-91. doi: 10.1002/hec.1279.
3
Health behaviors of cancer survivors: data from an Australian population-based survey.癌症幸存者的健康行为:来自澳大利亚一项基于人群的调查数据。
结直肠腺瘤性息肉切除术后个性化监测的有效性和成本效益评估
Epidemiol Rev. 2017 Jan 1;39(1):148-160. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx002.
4
Chemotherapy and molecular targeting therapy for recurrent cervical cancer.复发性宫颈癌的化疗与分子靶向治疗
Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Apr;28(2):241-53. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.02.14.
5
The effect of caregiving on bereavement outcome: study protocol for a longitudinal, prospective study.照顾者对丧亲结果的影响:一项纵向、前瞻性研究的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Mar 15;14:6. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0009-z. eCollection 2015.
6
Cost-effective analysis of topical chlorhexidine in hematologic patients at risk for oral mucositis.对有口腔黏膜炎风险的血液病患者使用外用洗必泰的成本效益分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Nov;19(8):1843-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1438-z. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
7
Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening.单次与两次粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Gut. 2013 May;62(5):727-34. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301917. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
8
Lifetime costs of the top five cancers in Taiwan.台湾地区前 5 大癌症的终生成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Jun;13(3):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0307-1. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
9
Standardizing the inclusion of indirect medical costs in economic evaluations.标准化经济评估中间接医疗成本的纳入。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Mar;29(3):175-87. doi: 10.2165/11586130-000000000-00000.
Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Oct;18(8):881-94. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9033-5. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
4
End-of-life expenditures by Ohio Medicaid beneficiaries dying of cancer.俄亥俄州医疗补助计划中死于癌症的受益人临终支出情况。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Winter;28(2):65-80.
5
Unrelated medical care in life years gained and the cost utility of primary prevention: in search of a 'perfect' cost-utility ratio.非相关医疗保健在获得的生命年数及一级预防的成本效益:探寻“完美”的成本效益比。
Health Econ. 2007 Apr;16(4):421-33. doi: 10.1002/hec.1181.
6
Health care costs in the last year of life--the Dutch experience.生命最后一年的医疗保健费用——荷兰的经验。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1720-31. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.018. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
7
Does prevention save costs? Considering deferral of the expensive last year of life.预防能节省成本吗?考虑推迟生命中昂贵的最后一年。
J Health Econ. 2005 Jul;24(4):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.11.009. Epub 2005 Mar 20.
8
Should the consumption of survivors be included as a cost in cost-utility analysis?幸存者的消费是否应作为成本效益分析中的一项成本包含在内?
Health Econ. 2004 May;13(5):417-27. doi: 10.1002/hec.850.
9
Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions compared to open-breast biopsy.与开放式乳房活检相比,立体定向大芯针活检用于不可触及乳腺病变的成本效益分析。
Br J Cancer. 2004 Jan 26;90(2):383-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601520.
10
Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jul 16;137(2):96-104. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2-200207160-00007.