Suppr超能文献

福莫特罗与布地奈德联合作为维持和缓解治疗与吸入性糖皮质激素维持治疗对成人和儿童慢性哮喘的疗效比较

Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus inhaled steroid maintenance for chronic asthma in adults and children.

作者信息

Cates Christopher J, Lasserson Toby J

机构信息

Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK, SW17 0RE.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD007313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007313.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditionally inhaled treatment for asthma has been considered as preventer and reliever therapy. The combination of formoterol and budesonide in a single inhaler introduces the possibility of using a single inhaler for both prevention and relief of symptoms (single inhaler therapy).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to compare formoterol and corticosteroid in single inhaler for maintenance and relief of symptoms with inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance and a separate reliever inhaler.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We last searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register in September 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in adults and children with chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted the characteristics and results of each study. Authors or manufacturers were asked to supply unpublished data in relation to primary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies on 5,378 adults compared single inhaler therapy with current best practice, and did not show a significant reduction in participants with exacerbations causing hospitalisation (Peto OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.24 to 1.45) or treated with oral steroids (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03). Three of these studies on 4281 adults did not show a significant reduction in time to first severe exacerbation needing medical intervention (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.07). These trials demonstrated a reduction in the mean total daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids with single inhaler therapy (mean reduction ranged from 107 to 267 micrograms/day, but the trial results were not combined due to heterogeneity). The full results from four further studies on 4,600 adults comparing single inhaler therapy with current best practice are awaited.Three studies including 4,209 adults compared single inhaler therapy with higher dose budesonide maintenance and terbutaline for symptom relief. No significant reduction was found with single inhaler therapy in the risk of patients suffering an asthma exacerbation leading to hospitalisation (Peto OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.28 to 1.09), but fewer patients on single inhaler therapy needed a course of oral corticosteroids (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.64). These results translate into an eleven month number needed to treat of 14 (95% CI 12 to 18), to prevent one patient being treated with oral corticosteroids for an exacerbation. The run-in for these studies involved withdrawal of long-acting beta(2)-agonists, and patients were recruited who were symptomatic during run-in.One study included children (N = 224), in which single inhaler therapy was compared to higher dose budesonide. There was a significant reduction in participants who needed an increase in their inhaled steroids with single inhaler therapy, but there were only two hospitalisations for asthma and no separate data on courses of oral corticosteroids. Less inhaled and oral corticosteroids were used in the single inhaler therapy group and the annual height gain was also 1 cm greater in the single inhaler therapy group, [95% CI 0.3 to 1.7 cm].There was no significant difference found in fatal or non-fatal serious adverse events for any of the comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Single inhaler therapy can reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations needing oral corticosteroids in comparison with fixed dose maintenance inhaled corticosteroids. Guidelines and common best practice suggest the addition of regular long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids for uncontrolled asthma, and single inhaler therapy has not been demonstrated to significantly reduce exacerbations in comparison with current best practice, although results of five large trials are awaiting full publication. Single inhaler therapy is not currently licensed for children under 18 years of age in the United Kingdom.

摘要

背景

传统上,哮喘的吸入治疗被视为预防和缓解治疗。福莫特罗和布地奈德在单一吸入器中的联合使用带来了使用单一吸入器进行症状预防和缓解(单一吸入器疗法)的可能性。

目的

本综述的目的是比较单一吸入器中福莫特罗和皮质类固醇用于维持和缓解症状与吸入皮质类固醇用于维持及单独使用缓解吸入器的效果。

检索策略

我们最近一次检索Cochrane Airways Group试验注册库是在2008年9月。

入选标准

针对患有慢性哮喘的成人和儿童的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估纳入研究,并提取每项研究的特征和结果。要求作者或制造商提供与主要结局相关的未发表数据。

主要结果

五项针对5378名成人的研究比较了单一吸入器疗法与当前最佳实践,结果显示因病情加重而住院的参与者数量没有显著减少(Peto比值比0.59;95%置信区间0.24至1.45),接受口服类固醇治疗的参与者数量也没有显著减少(比值比0.83;95%置信区间0.66至1.03)。其中三项针对4281名成人的研究未显示首次需要医疗干预的严重病情加重时间有显著减少(风险比0.96;95%置信区间0.85至1.07)。这些试验表明单一吸入器疗法可使吸入皮质类固醇的每日平均总剂量降低(平均降低幅度为每日107至267微克,但由于异质性未合并试验结果)。另外四项针对4600名成人比较单一吸入器疗法与当前最佳实践的研究的完整结果有待公布。三项纳入4209名成人的研究比较了单一吸入器疗法与高剂量布地奈德维持治疗及特布他林用于症状缓解的效果。单一吸入器疗法在导致住院的哮喘病情加重风险方面未显示出显著降低(Peto比值比0.56;95%置信区间0.28至1.09),但接受单一吸入器疗法的患者中需要口服皮质类固醇疗程的人数较少(比值比0.54;95%置信区间0.45至0.64)。这些结果转化为需治疗14例患者11个月(95%置信区间12至18)才能预防1例患者因病情加重而接受口服皮质类固醇治疗。这些研究的导入期包括停用长效β₂激动剂,并招募在导入期有症状的患者。一项研究纳入了儿童(N = 224),其中将单一吸入器疗法与高剂量布地奈德进行了比较。接受单一吸入器疗法且需要增加吸入类固醇剂量的参与者数量显著减少,但仅有两例哮喘住院病例,且没有关于口服皮质类固醇疗程的单独数据。单一吸入器疗法组使用的吸入和口服皮质类固醇较少,且单一吸入器疗法组的年身高增长也高出1厘米,[95%置信区间0.3至1.7厘米]。在任何比较中,致命或非致命严重不良事件均未发现显著差异。

作者结论

与固定剂量维持吸入皮质类固醇相比,单一吸入器疗法可降低需要口服皮质类固醇治疗的哮喘病情加重风险。指南和常见最佳实践建议在吸入皮质类固醇基础上加用常规长效β₂激动剂治疗控制不佳的哮喘,尽管五项大型试验的结果有待全面发表,但与当前最佳实践相比,单一吸入器疗法尚未显示出能显著减少病情加重情况。在英国,单一吸入器疗法目前未获批准用于18岁以下儿童。

相似文献

8
Inhaled magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute asthma.吸入硫酸镁治疗急性哮喘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD003898. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003898.pub6.

引用本文的文献

2
Statins for asthma.用于治疗哮喘的他汀类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD013268. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013268.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验