Horner Aidan J, Henson Richard N
Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, England.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):757-79. doi: 10.1037/a0015262.
Repetition priming is often thought to reflect the facilitation of 1 or more processes engaged during initial and subsequent presentations of a stimulus. Priming can also reflect the formation of direct, stimulus-response (S-R) bindings, retrieval of which bypasses many of the processes engaged during the initial presentation. Using long-lag repetition priming of semantic classification of visual stimuli, the authors used task switches between study and test phases to reveal several signatures of S-R learning in Experiments 1 through 5. Indeed, the authors found surprisingly little, if any, evidence of priming that could not be attributed to S-R learning, once they considered the possibility that stimuli are simultaneously bound to multiple, different response codes. Experiments 6 and 7 provided more direct evidence for independent contributions from at least 3 levels of response representation: the action (e.g., specific finger used), the decision (e.g., yes-no), and the task-specific classification (e.g., bigger-smaller). Although S-R learning has been discussed previously in many contexts, the present results go beyond existing theories of S-R learning. Moreover, its dominant role brings into question many interpretations of priming during speeded classification tasks in terms of perceptual-conceptual processing.
重复启动效应通常被认为反映了在刺激的初次呈现和后续呈现过程中一个或多个过程的促进作用。启动效应也可以反映直接的刺激 - 反应(S-R)联结的形成,对其的提取绕过了初次呈现过程中涉及的许多过程。通过对视觉刺激进行语义分类的长时滞后重复启动效应,作者在实验1至5中使用了学习阶段和测试阶段之间的任务切换来揭示S-R学习的几个特征。实际上,一旦作者考虑到刺激可能同时与多个不同反应代码相联结的可能性,他们发现几乎没有(如果有的话)不能归因于S-R学习的启动效应证据。实验6和7为至少三个反应表征水平的独立作用提供了更直接的证据:动作(例如,使用的特定手指)、决策(例如,是或否)和特定任务分类(例如,更大或更小)。虽然S-R学习在许多背景下都曾被讨论过,但目前的结果超越了现有的S-R学习理论。此外,其主导作用对在快速分类任务中关于启动效应的许多基于知觉 - 概念加工的解释提出了质疑。