Staub Adrian, Grant Margaret, Clifton Charles, Rayner Keith
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, amherst, MA 01003, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):806-14. doi: 10.1037/a0015123.
Using a word-by-word self-paced reading paradigm, T. A. Farmer, M. H. Christiansen, and P. Monaghan (2006) reported faster reading times for words that are phonologically typical for their syntactic category (i.e., noun or verb) than for words that are phonologically atypical. This result has been taken to suggest that language users are sensitive to subtle relationships between sound and syntactic function and that they make rapid use of this information in comprehension. The present article reports attempts to replicate this result using both eyetracking during normal reading (Experiment 1) and word-by-word self-paced reading (Experiment 2). No hint of a phonological typicality effect emerged on any reading-time measure in Experiment 1, nor did Experiment 2 replicate Farmer et al.'s finding from self-paced reading. Indeed, the differences between condition means were not consistently in the predicted direction, as phonologically atypical verbs were read more quickly than phonologically typical verbs, on most measures. Implications for research on visual word recognition are discussed.
T. A. 法默、M. H. 克里斯蒂安森和P. 莫纳汉(2006年)采用逐词自定步速阅读范式,报告称,对于在语音上与其句法类别(即名词或动词)相符的单词,其阅读速度要快于语音上不相符的单词。这一结果表明,语言使用者对语音和句法功能之间的微妙关系很敏感,并且在理解过程中会迅速利用这些信息。本文报告了分别使用正常阅读时的眼动追踪技术(实验1)和逐词自定步速阅读技术(实验2)来重复这一结果的尝试。在实验1的任何阅读时间测量中,均未出现语音典型性效应的迹象,实验2也未重复法默等人在自定步速阅读中的发现。事实上,条件均值之间的差异并不始终符合预测的方向,在大多数测量中,语音上不典型的动词比语音上典型的动词阅读速度更快。文中讨论了对视觉单词识别研究的启示。