Marwan M, Ropers D, Pflederer T, Daniel W G, Achenbach S
Innere Medizin II, Ulmenweg 18, Erlangen 91054, Germany.
Heart. 2009 Jul;95(13):1056-60. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.153353. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
Multidetector CT allows detection of coronary artery calcium and, after contrast injection, visualisation of the coronary artery lumen. It is commonly assumed that the absence of coronary calcification makes the presence of obstructive coronary lesions highly unlikely. This study evaluates the clinical characteristics of patients with at least one symptomatic, high-grade coronary artery stenosis in both computed tomography and invasive angiography but absence of any coronary calcification and compares the results with patients with stenoses in the setting of detectable coronary calcium
The study retrospectively identified 21 consecutive patients with symptoms in whom a high-grade coronary artery stenosis had been identified in 64-slice or dual-source CT coronary angiography (Siemens Sensation 64 or Siemens Definition, 120 kV, 50 to 85 ml of intravenous contrast at 5 ml/s) in the absence of coronary calcium and in whom that finding had been confirmed by invasive coronary angiography. Clinical presentation ("unstable": all forms of acute coronary syndrome versus "stable": stable chest pain or dyspnoea on exertion) and standard cardiovascular risk factors were assessed, and the results were compared with 42 consecutive patients with symptoms in whom both coronary calcium and coronary stenoses had been identified in computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography.
The majority of patients with coronary stenoses in the absence of coronary calcium presented with "unstable" symptoms (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina), significantly more frequently than patients with detectable calcification (71% vs 26%, p = 0.001). The age range of patients without calcium was 33 to 76 years, their mean age was younger (53 (SD 13) vs 63 (8) years, p<0.001), but none of the risk factors showed any significant difference compared with patients with calcification.
The presence of significant coronary artery stenosis in the absence of coronary calcium is possible. It is more likely in the setting of unstable angina or NSTEMI than in stable chest pain and occurs more frequently in younger patients.
多层螺旋CT能够检测冠状动脉钙化情况,注射造影剂后还可显示冠状动脉管腔。通常认为,无冠状动脉钙化意味着极不可能存在阻塞性冠状动脉病变。本研究评估了在计算机断层扫描和有创血管造影中均存在至少一处有症状的重度冠状动脉狭窄但无任何冠状动脉钙化的患者的临床特征,并将结果与在可检测到冠状动脉钙化情况下出现狭窄的患者进行比较。
本研究回顾性纳入了21例有症状的患者,这些患者在64层或双源CT冠状动脉造影(西门子Sensation 64或西门子Definition,120 kV,以5 ml/s的速度静脉注射50至85 ml造影剂)中被发现存在重度冠状动脉狭窄且无冠状动脉钙化,并且该结果经有创冠状动脉造影证实。评估临床表现( “不稳定型”:所有形式的急性冠状动脉综合征与“稳定型”:稳定型胸痛或劳力性呼吸困难)和标准心血管危险因素,并将结果与42例有症状的连续患者进行比较,这些患者在计算机断层扫描和有创冠状动脉造影中均被发现存在冠状动脉钙化和冠状动脉狭窄。
在无冠状动脉钙化的情况下出现冠状动脉狭窄的大多数患者表现为“不稳定型”症状(非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或不稳定型心绞痛),明显比有可检测到钙化的患者更频繁(71%对26%,p = 0.001)。无钙化患者的年龄范围为33至76岁,他们的平均年龄更年轻(53(标准差13)岁对63(8)岁,p<0.001),但与有钙化的患者相比,所有危险因素均无显著差异。
在无冠状动脉钙化的情况下可能存在显著的冠状动脉狭窄。与稳定型胸痛相比,其在不稳定型心绞痛或NSTEMI情况下更有可能出现,且在年轻患者中更常见。